In post 1843, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like your only defense for a long time was "I'm being scumread for asking 'why Ank'"
Why
Ank
? The why part is correct but I’m fairly certain I didn’t single out Ank. So, I’m legit confused why you make it a point to mention Ank over Fire, who was the one hardpushing me?
That's NOT what I meant. I meant you were asking why Fire and Co. were scumreading Ank, you got blowback for that, and you challenged that as insufficient reason to scumread you (not directly from what I saw but rather implicitly).
In post 1833, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because scum can't kill IC, so it lives until the pair is lynched/leaves or the game ends
...I did think of a way for scum to still screw things up. Should I share or no? I rate it Medium on the "random possibilities scum may have already thought up" scale (ratings are Common, Medium, and Rare; btw this is me applying a funny system to something that happens often).
In post 1833, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because scum can't kill IC, so it lives until the pair is lynched/leaves or the game ends
...I did think of a way for scum to still screw things up. Should I share or no? I rate it Medium on the "random possibilities scum may have already thought up" scale (ratings are Common, Medium, and Rare; btw this is me applying a funny system to something that happens often).
Yes, share. I don’t understand how this setup, is good for town at all.
Why haven’t you answered this yet?
I still don’t understand how this setup is beneficial to town.
I wouldn't say it's better, but at worst it's not as bad as you guys seem to be saying.
As for the thing I thought of, scum could IC the dance partner of their scummiest, leave, and then town would be fucked.
In post 1843, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like your only defense for a long time was "I'm being scumread for asking 'why Ank'"
Why
Ank
? The why part is correct but I’m fairly certain I didn’t single out Ank. So, I’m legit confused why you make it a point to mention Ank over Fire, who was the one hardpushing me?
That's NOT what I meant. I meant you were asking why Fire and Co. were scumreading Ank, you got blowback for that, and you challenged that as insufficient reason to scumread you (not directly from what I saw but rather implicitly).
People scumread me, for asking why people were scumreading Ank? *confused*. How much of this game have you been reading?
I said people shouldn’t scumread me because of that?
*really really confuzzled now*
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 12:18 pm
by Krazy
In post 1900, Dr Worm wrote:It is VEEEERY HARD to type out CASES as an ACTUAL WORM!!
True but given you have written more about nancy than about Brie, getting a clearer sense of your thoughts there would help
In post 1895, Dr Worm wrote:DR WORM knows it"s NOT BEST FOR TOWN if WORM is INNOCENT CHILI!! So WORM DIES before INTERMISSONS..
I don't agree with you nuking yourself in that case. Scum are probably going to do one of three things with the IC:
1- Throw it on the partner of their scummiest partner (more likely)
2- Throw it on someone who won't be a town leader no matter what (likely and also possibly overlapping with 1)
3- Throw it on someone purely for wifom (less likely but in being less likely still possible)
I know that several players have expressed annoyance with your posting style, and as of yet, while I find your posts humorous, you are not an obvious read (at least for me). You being IC'd by scum would not be dramatically *the worst*
Although this line of logic is... mildly townie, so thanks for sharing.
In post 1833, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because scum can't kill IC, so it lives until the pair is lynched/leaves or the game ends
...I did think of a way for scum to still screw things up. Should I share or no? I rate it Medium on the "random possibilities scum may have already thought up" scale (ratings are Common, Medium, and Rare; btw this is me applying a funny system to something that happens often).
In post 1833, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because scum can't kill IC, so it lives until the pair is lynched/leaves or the game ends
...I did think of a way for scum to still screw things up. Should I share or no? I rate it Medium on the "random possibilities scum may have already thought up" scale (ratings are Common, Medium, and Rare; btw this is me applying a funny system to something that happens often).
Yes, share. I don’t understand how this setup, is good for town at all.
Why haven’t you answered this yet?
I still don’t understand how this setup is beneficial to town.
I wouldn't say it's better, but at worst it's not as bad as you guys seem to be saying.
As for the thing I thought of, scum could IC the dance partner of their scummiest, leave, and then town would be fucked.
Wouldn’t that be bad for scum? Don’t you think they would be far more likely to IC an obvtown read?
In post 1833, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because scum can't kill IC, so it lives until the pair is lynched/leaves or the game ends
...I did think of a way for scum to still screw things up. Should I share or no? I rate it Medium on the "random possibilities scum may have already thought up" scale (ratings are Common, Medium, and Rare; btw this is me applying a funny system to something that happens often).
In post 1833, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because scum can't kill IC, so it lives until the pair is lynched/leaves or the game ends
...I did think of a way for scum to still screw things up. Should I share or no? I rate it Medium on the "random possibilities scum may have already thought up" scale (ratings are Common, Medium, and Rare; btw this is me applying a funny system to something that happens often).
Yes, share. I don’t understand how this setup, is good for town at all.
Why haven’t you answered this yet?
I still don’t understand how this setup is beneficial to town.
I wouldn't say it's better, but at worst it's not as bad as you guys seem to be saying.
As for the thing I thought of, scum could IC the dance partner of their scummiest, leave, and then town would be fucked.
Wouldn’t that be bad for scum? Don’t you think they would be far more likely to IC an obvtown read?
Oh wait. NM, I think I misunderstood stood this. Yeah that would be to scum’s advantage, which is exactly why I don’t see this setup is protown.
In post 1900, Dr Worm wrote:It is VEEEERY HARD to type out CASES as an ACTUAL WORM!!
True but given you have written more about nancy than about Brie, getting a clearer sense of your thoughts there would help
In post 1895, Dr Worm wrote:DR WORM knows it"s NOT BEST FOR TOWN if WORM is INNOCENT CHILI!! So WORM DIES before INTERMISSONS..
I don't agree with you nuking yourself in that case. Scum are probably going to do one of three things with the IC:
1- Throw it on the partner of their scummiest partner (more likely)
2- Throw it on someone who won't be a town leader no matter what (likely and also possibly overlapping with 1)
3- Throw it on someone purely for wifom (less likely but in being less likely still possible)
I know that several players have expressed annoyance with your posting style, and as of yet, while I find your posts humorous, you are not an obvious read (at least for me). You being IC'd by scum would not be dramatically *the worst*
Although this line of logic is... mildly townie, so thanks for sharing.
In post 1803, Ankamius wrote:I think I've mentioned about a half dozen times that I don't have confident reads and I probably won't until I get to analyze the thread more closely this weekend
scums are afraid to admit this and publicly announce it
Yet when I admit to it, people scumread me for fence sitting. I call admitting lack of good reads NAI.
In post 1771, TheBrie wrote:I might be onboard if enough people think it's a good idea. I'm not convinced of Vedith being scum, but I'll believe those who say he can't be relied on to use his lynch power well. I'm glad I don't have anything like that.
Given that one gentlemen is leaving the dance already, do you have a preference for who should be excluded from the dance in pre-dance, and is there a second gentlemen that you scumread strongly enough that you would refrain from joining the dance to ensure his exclusion?
Not yet. It's more that I've barely got time to play, and if I could be persuaded that me not joining would benefit town, I'd probably do it. But I don't have strong reads.
The more I think about it, the less I can see it being a good idea. I'm not all that worried about Vedith, and don't undertand the mechanics well enough to see why it would help anyway. Wouldn't he end up with a larger proportion of the votes with less couples?
Also I believe Ank is still intending to refuse all invitations, so there'll be two gentlemen excluded already.
Not sure beyond some feelings from before the spamfest (recall feeling you were town and Nancy was scum), but I intend to fix that.
In post 1843, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like your only defense for a long time was "I'm being scumread for asking 'why Ank'"
Any reads on anyone other than me?
Did you not see me commenting I felt Vedith was town earlier in that post?
yes and I was “scum” and you intended “to fix that”?
So, no reads on anyone else?
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 12:35 pm
by Krazy
In post 1913, TheBrie wrote:Not yet. It's more that I've barely got time to play, and if I could be persuaded that me not joining would benefit town, I'd probably do it. But I don't have strong reads.
The more I think about it, the less I can see it being a good idea. I'm not all that worried about Vedith, and don't undertand the mechanics well enough to see why it would help anyway. Wouldn't he end up with a larger proportion of the votes with less couples?
Also I believe Ank is still intending to refuse all invitations, so there'll be two gentlemen excluded already.
Right, in that case I would drop this line of thought. If you were like, dead set on TWO guys in particular being scum, then that would be a good 'non-pairing', but otherwise it would be more informative for town to reassess after the pre-dance exclusion
Just for funsies though -- bottom three guys? Not necessarily scumreads if you don't have a lot of scumreads, but bottom three guys you have the least reason to townlean? That's basically what I'm doing and I actually think it's helping my thought process more than I thought it would
In post 1803, Ankamius wrote:I think I've mentioned about a half dozen times that I don't have confident reads and I probably won't until I get to analyze the thread more closely this weekend
scums are afraid to admit this and publicly announce it
Yet when I admit to it, people scumread me for fence sitting. I call admitting lack of good reads NAI.
In post 1771, TheBrie wrote:I might be onboard if enough people think it's a good idea. I'm not convinced of Vedith being scum, but I'll believe those who say he can't be relied on to use his lynch power well. I'm glad I don't have anything like that.
Given that one gentlemen is leaving the dance already, do you have a preference for who should be excluded from the dance in pre-dance, and is there a second gentlemen that you scumread strongly enough that you would refrain from joining the dance to ensure his exclusion?
Not yet. It's more that I've barely got time to play, and if I could be persuaded that me not joining would benefit town, I'd probably do it. But I don't have strong reads.
The more I think about it, the less I can see it being a good idea. I'm not all that worried about Vedith, and don't undertand the mechanics well enough to see why it would help anyway. Wouldn't he end up with a larger proportion of the votes with less couples?
Also I believe Ank is still intending to refuse all invitations, so there'll be two gentlemen excluded already.
IC Worm would probably drive me insane.
For the love of all that is holy, we cannot let this happen.
For the love of all that is holy, we cannot let this happen.
Nancy sometimes it's hard to tell which one is the joke, ngl
but are you really advocating a policy lynch on worm just because you don't like his posts or are you scumreading him for his push on you?
I would honestly prefer he didn’t make it to first dance. IDGAF about his read on me. I would feel very differently about him, if he cut out all of his crap: posting in allcaps, misspelling words, etc.
Well, I do both think it’s hillarious and a really terrible idea at the same time. Re: worm IC.
In post 1843, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like your only defense for a long time was "I'm being scumread for asking 'why Ank'"
Why
Ank
? The why part is correct but I’m fairly certain I didn’t single out Ank. So, I’m legit confused why you make it a point to mention Ank over Fire, who was the one hardpushing me?
That's NOT what I meant. I meant you were asking why Fire and Co. were scumreading Ank, you got blowback for that, and you challenged that as insufficient reason to scumread you (not directly from what I saw but rather implicitly).
People scumread me, for asking why people were scumreading Ank? *confused*.
