Mafiascum.net

IT'S DADDY AND HE SAID HE WANTED THE PAGETOP BABY

i was actually thinking: this hammer test looks kind of fake and if kerset tries some ate "i was town idiots" shit i would get really sussed because he pulled that angery react shit in mini 2156 as scum once, where if he reacted "that's not a hammer" it'd be fairly townie

i kind of left that thought floating somewhere and i don't remember why

bout to hammer you for that

In post 1902, Ydrasse wrote:bout to hammer you for that

me or iv? because i'm definitely down with lynching at least one of the two options

In post 1896, osuka wrote:let me guess, is it because you got a scum role pm?

yup!

yes, yes, and yes!

god it feels good to say it

you've been calling me scum all game and my conscience can no longer take it. I give in to the mental burden

I am scum

You win, osuka, you win, you've craked me

In post 1893, teacher wrote:Tswizzle - you haven’t directly reacted to the claim. Thoughts?

the claim is enough that i never vote to lunch kerset today. lets see if scum shoots there tonight. kerset also isnt my top scumread anyway. i dont really see myself voting outside IV, plus, and menal today.

I'll reevaluate on iv tomorrow, ran out of time now.


Kerset claim looks positive, not sure why people think ascetic contradicts doctor. (or miller for that matter.)
Tayl0r looks better -- might be others looking worse.

In post 1704, innocentvillager wrote:i don’t have any names but like on principle anyone who like wasn’t like really here in this chaos just gained some scum equity, id have to reread some of the chaos

This doesn't make sense to me?

In post 1543, Tayl0r Swift wrote:given menalque is shading the doc claim and actually followed through on pushing for the gated claim, menal is prolly scum with plus and iv. game solved. gg.

Considering this.


Mena's Osuka push is bad. I don't see what the supposed scum equity is.


Andre during that time seems obvtown from content.
Read through kerset claim and hammertesting backwards (each page forward but backward by page) so now my view of how obvious it was is distorted.



I think teachers take in 1860 comes from town.

Yadrasse + Shelly still townread.

In post 1903, osuka wrote:

In post 1902, Ydrasse wrote:bout to hammer you for that

me or iv? because i'm definitely down with lynching at least one of the two options

Pay for your sins.

like theres really no point in lunching claimed doc day 1. if the claimed doc is alive in lylo then doc has some explaining to do, but today? nawh. thats never the lunch.

maybe that was my thought. there's no urgency to test the doc claim

In post 1909, innocentvillager wrote:maybe that was my thought. there's no urgency to test the doc claim

the fact that youre completely incapable of expressing a thought on your own though, suggests that you dont actually have any, which suggests that youre scum unable to get into the town mindset.

also if there's an actual protective wouldn't they have cc'd by now or something

again sorry i don't know how pr setup spec works/don't actually cc im just wondering

you just sit and wait for a thought you like to come floating by and latch onto it, retroactively claiming it as your own.

In post 1910, Tayl0r Swift wrote:the fact that youre completely incapable of expressing a thought on your own though, suggests that you dont actually have any, which suggests that youre scum unable to get into the town mindset.

just because i don't have good reasons for scumreads doesn't mean i don't have thoughts of my own, lol, ive stated many of my thoughts plenty of times...

In post 1912, Tayl0r Swift wrote:you just sit and wait for a thought you like to come floating by and latch onto it, retroactively claiming it as your own.

yup wow really insightful and defniitely the only thing ive been doing this whole game

i mean if i were the doc i wouldnt CC to that claim. i guess i dont really buy the claim though, and expect that someone out there now has kerset as confirmed scum, which i guess explains why the wagon is moving back that way. also dont take this as a crumb that im the doc, im not.

In post 1914, innocentvillager wrote:

In post 1912, Tayl0r Swift wrote:you just sit and wait for a thought you like to come floating by and latch onto it, retroactively claiming it as your own.

yup wow really insightful and defniitely the only thing ive been doing this whole game

i mean...

cC’ing is more complicated in a normal — I tend to believe you don’t CC day one regardless, and just pocket the red for later — either D2 or D3, but that depends on crumbing and playing consistent with the red knowledge.

Also IV for someone waiting around to discuss the terrible hammer test apparently 1654 and 1827 just whizzed right by you.

i saw you commenting on it but didn't feel it was urgent to address

now that you're putting your foot down finally and pushing it it feels more notable i guess

actually idk, i think i had some more nuanced thoughts about this before my whole fiasco and that distracted me a lot from kerset tbh so if i don't sound coherent here that's probably why

like taylor and i said i just didn't feel the urgency to talk about it since i feel weird eliminating a d1 doc with no cc when they are a good nk target potentially anyway

but idk if scum are going to kill there anymore bc suspicions so ya

In post 1881, osuka wrote:but please tell me all about how i was scumreading the slot, saudade

i dont think youre scum but please for the love of god or whatever deity you believe in, get your head out of your fucking ass yes

watch your mouth kid

uh the internet ate my post. i reread the sequence from your post (teacher) around the fake hammer. i agree that the claim is worthless and that it wasnt believable. i still think kerset probably isnt worth lunching today, partly because of the claim, and partly because there are plenty of other good candidates (for me at this point ideally IV and menal, plus is a bit less likely, although mostly due to PoE and not because plus has actually done anything worth a damn).

In post 1919, innocentvillager wrote:like taylor and i said i just didn't feel the urgency to talk about it since i feel weird eliminating a d1 doc with no cc when they are a good nk target potentially anyway

but idk if scum are going to kill there anymore bc suspicions so ya

i mean the claim is one thing. but its still worth talking about the fake claim and surrounding posts, yes?

In post 1922, Tayl0r Swift wrote:fake claim

what fake claim??

I think its worth rereading iv again, the mental breakdown is too odd not to raise any doubts
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm