In post 1857, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Oh no. You of all people do not get to just drop a vote with no reasoning and walk away. Why Battle Mage over the other wagons? Does the case against Murdercat make sense?
Battle Mage has been my number 1 SR for ages, so it's hardly unexplained.
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:04 am
by Haschel Cedricson
There were two questions in my post and you only answered the former.
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:05 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1766, Blitzo wrote:I don't doubt that there may be issues between Gamma and BM.
To be honest I don't really think it's my business unless it becomes gamebreaking somehow, but I don't think that's really the case here either.
What I doubt is how much that actually matters when BM is actually quite guilty of acting this way thus far.
I'm also lost as to why he's switching back to me here.
@Gamma - no, I can't use line breaks right now sorry.
@pooky - again - is this real or not?
I need actual thoughts to come out of your mouth plx.
You're "reading the thread" but you're "lost" as to why my vote moved from MC to you. Can you tell me why that is?
I think whether you call me scummy or townie, it's hard to argue I've been difficult to follow - my reasoning has usually been simplistic and obvious. It feels like a cop out to say "BM did this and I don't understand" when I had explained very clearly, succinctly and simply in the thread. And if you really hadn't understood, you could have asked me, rather than just inexplicably interpreting your confusion as an indication of my guilt.
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:15 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1857, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Flea just spent a lot of time and energy in 1619 making a post that can basically be summarized as "In conclusion MC is a land of contrasts." Not a fan.
I see some posts are talking about meta. I plan on ignoring those posts.
Oh no. You of all people do not get to just drop a vote with no reasoning and walk away. Why Battle Mage over the other wagons? Does the case against Murdercat make sense?
Okay. BM-wagon = Bad, Murdercat-wagon = Good, Titus and Flea also good candidates for scum.
, I've detected a lot of paranoia from your slot so you double-downing on that
BM
vote makes little sense to me.
Murder
, I sympathize strongly if you're actually town here but I'm not feeling your solve or motivation that much, is there something to be done about that?
TGP
, is it accurate to say that you're being really focused on
Blitzo
and pay little heed to other slots? Because that's how I feel about you.
Pooky
, I don't know if my townread on you can survive if you say you're obvtown again WHILE keeping your vote on
Blitzo
without further context.
Alisae
, if you think I'm scum, give me at least 2 people I've been hard-defending this dayphase because that's the only way I'll think your serious about reading me. The number doubles D2.
BM
, I'm not wanting to inject myself between you and
Gamma
, but do you think your counterwagon -
Murder
is actually scum here, or town?
Reck
, case me your
Titus
read.
Haschel
, do something with more than one to two slots at a time, please. I'm not just talking about posts, you come into the thread and speak only on a few aspects of the game at a time.
I could go either way on Murdercat. He's not my preferred elim, but he's also not townblocked. good take on Flea too.
In post 1820, SirCakez wrote:Ok but if anything he seems better here then Xenoblade 2?
Yeah that’s where he gets ya. He seems “better” when he’s scum, because of what I spoke of earlier about being an agent of chaos.
yeah but in the game I played with him as scum he was actually terrible, much worse than here or Xenoblade 2 (quality of play wise)
haha I think this can be exempt from the "no bashing people" rule, because I was in fact, really bad in that game. I just couldn't get my head around the mech as it wasn't a normal mafia game by any stretch!
In post 1878, Taly wrote:Flea, if you like that this post happened, then where is your vote to reflect it?
Because I'm chaotic af, unstable af and I think I've placed more votes than anyone at this point.
I'm already aware that my voting and progression looks opportunistic, I'm aware my brainspewing isn't regarded well here. I'm aware people dislike my voting places to the point it has derailed some bits. BM has already commented my vote means nothing, essentially due to how I play here.
So screw it I say.
If my voting scares people off wagons and carries about as much weight as a presidential vote in California then I may as well watch the others do their thang and use my powers for good and derail bad wagons.
what?
I don't quite know what to make of this. Although I will say, it isn't that your vote means nothing in general, but that your vote for me was meaningless because it didn't result from any vaguely plausible pro-town solving. You just quoted every post in my ISO and said "this means BM is scum because...[insert fabricated justification here]".
No balance, no objectivity, means no credibility. DGB has learnt it's quicker and equally effective to just throw your vote around without the pretense of any rhyme or reason.
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:22 am
by Flea The Magician
ahh yes, because me streaming my thoughts requires
In post 1824, Taly wrote:I'll decide what to do with my vote tomorrow. Very tired.
1671 and 1708 are good posts that elaborate my townread on
BM
.
Titus
, this fucks with my brain:
In post 1497, Titus wrote:If I get miseliminated for voting scum and having a life, I can live with that. We still should be no executing though. If we do miseliminate, I'm objectively the best one. So like I said, no hard feelings.
1)
Need a strong case on why we should no lim.
2)
Why are you ever a good mislim option... why is mislimming ever a choose-able option here... you're not even in a competing wagon at the moment.
3)
Is your
BM
scumread based around your case in 1293? Has it evolved?
1) No elim ensures a task victory or actual evidence against a scum read.
2) Objectively, I have only one task to do. It's simple but tedious. I was a wagon at the time I posted that.
3) Besides BM sheeping everything with a pulse, no further evidence has emerged to change my read.
Titus is the reason you're ignoring the further evidence, which did emerge, because you're scum and it's inconvenient, or because you genuinely missed it?
I'm ok with you arguing the point, or disagreeing or whatever. But what's actually happened is:
Titus makes case on BM
BM explains why Titus case is flawed
Titus ignores BM but continues to post, frequently referring back to her debunked BM-case.
I think that's a reasonable expectation, and certainly when it comes to your conclusion. What value does your analysis serve if you start out with an assumption I'm scum, and do everything possible to manufacture everything I post into a scumtell?
In post 1857, Haschel Cedricson wrote:Oh no. You of all people do not get to just drop a vote with no reasoning and walk away. Why Battle Mage over the other wagons? Does the case against Murdercat make sense?
Battle Mage has been my number 1 SR for ages, so it's hardly unexplained.
you explained an initial read, which I subsequently illustrated was based on a (potentially genuine) misunderstanding on your part. The fact that you're continuing to refer to me as your "number 1 SR", ignoring that entirely, suggests you're playing a more passive, ambivalent style akin to scum-Titus.
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:36 am
by Flea The Magician
None of what I did was to build a case or fabricate reasons. You're reading too far into my post and your over defensiveness over it is amusing (*≧▽≦)ﾉｼ))
I am an emissary of chaos.
I stream my thoughts as I think them while I'm thinking.
You have construed this to be a lolcase.
It wasn't a case.
It was a D1 crock of poop that was me thinking "Hmmm this slot is suspicious". then me thought streaming as I looked.
Same with Titus.
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:37 am
by Battle Mage
same with Titus?
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:38 am
by Flea The Magician
I start with the assumption you're suspicious null. I then go look for things I like or dislike.
I do apologise if I don't play by your rules.
But Chaos has no rules.
And yes, the same with Titus.
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:40 am
by Flea The Magician
I love when people try to understand the machinations and ruminations of chaos <3
Its so cute
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:40 am
by Taly
{Alisae, OWER}
{Cakez, Bell, Akarin, Murder, Pooky, Gamma, BM}
{Reckoner, Haschel, Blitzo}
{TGP, DGB, Flea, Titus}
This is where I'm at and how I've changed in the past 24 hours.
I'm feeling icky about this 3v1 between
Gamma/Titus/Flea V BM
that literally has not died this entire game.
Surprisingly
Reck/Haschel/Cakez
are the only people who've recently made any sense to me in these past few pages.
I don't really have a strong one. Titus defended me early which made me feel warm and fuzzy, and Titus put out an early readslist that was like, unprompted. I believe Titus was the first person to call out the "HC is scum riding Reck's coattails" thing.
#1786 - SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACE! [Admit it, you read it in the voice] (✿◠‿◠)
#1791 - You're meant to try and do it, and not just have it happen. V●ᴥ●V
#1791 - Another precisely average post from DGB (7 words of nothing), why are we letting this slide? And why are we letting these votes slide? ɿ(｡･ɜ･)ɾⓌⓗⓨ?
#1803 - You wish. You're town for now but not IC levels of town.
#1811 - Oh ye gods actual content from DGB that's incredibly vaguely useful! ˓˓ ⍥⃝⃝ ˒˒
#1818 - ... I can't put my wall up in this catchup format. UNVOTE: BM - I strongly dislike the Titus and DGB votes here and the feeling is strong. I get called out for opportunism but these two get a pass? ¬ɿ(｡･ɜ･)ɾⓌⓗⓐⓣ？On what planet do I exist currently? ... actually ... don't answer that.
#1836 - I think people got more vocal and some people got more pissy.
#1839 - I kinda wanna give the sad flareon hugs... but I dont wanna get burned.
#1862 - It's called embracing the chaotic nature of my mind and rolling with it.
My mind I'va lost-a mah mind I'va lost. ma. mind. I've losta my mind I'VE LOST MY MIND
dammit now I need to work that song into a post somewhere... I think DBG might be a good candidate for it.
#1866 - Disagree. I think MC is still holding on hope for it.
this is useless content masquerading as useful content. nobody is going to read this, nobody's going to click each post to see what you're responding to, but it sure does LOOK like content!
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:42 am
by xRECKONERx
i see this line of dialogue already happened ok
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:43 am
by Flea The Magician
Well people moan about my quote walls, pick one people!
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:44 am
by xRECKONERx
cakez is like, a legitimately top tier townread for me rn
