Mafiascum.net

In post 1894, Datisi wrote:

In post 1890, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1886, Datisi wrote:

In post 1881, MathBlade wrote:Furthermore if Chaos does die then those “useless” results which could damn scum get buried.

could. maybe could. this is where we trust that town!omega has enough knowledge of his own role and normal games as a whole to know whether his n2 results "could" damn someone or not and whether they're worth sharing.

You’re missing my point.

There should be no decision.

If I am dying that night I out my results no matter what.

you're missing mine. it's not guaranteed he dies, hell, maybe the act itself of him claiming will cause scum to not kill him. like, trust him that town!him knows what's he doing with his role.

I don’t know him. His play is shit all game and I don’t buy any of it.

I don’t trust Chaos.

If I did this would be a moot argument

In post 1889, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1887, DkKoba wrote:You're twisting everything just to portray chaos as scum.

I believe Chaos is scum.

I find his defenders are much more looking at Chaos though rose tinted glasses here.

I am literally doing the opposite here and assuming he is town here Koba.

Ok. I read him correctly despite consensus being against him in the past. I caved later by my initial vibes were right. Case him if you really think he is scum

In post 1899, Titus wrote:You're going against locktown Math and trying to go after his extremely confident clear. It's not happening. Even if you think Chaos is scum, he has a partner.

In what world is math locktown?

In post 1902, DkKoba wrote:

In post 1899, Titus wrote:You're going against locktown Math and trying to go after his extremely confident clear. It's not happening. Even if you think Chaos is scum, he has a partner.

In what world is math locktown?

I think Titus forgot a comma.

You’re going against locktown, Math.

and make sure to address why a scum chaos would vote their partner on a whim of a case from *datisi* if what was said was correct

In post 1898, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1896, ChaosOmega wrote:If I fullclaim, what are scum adjusting to during the day Math? Me not fullclaiming is allowing scum to make a mistake by not having complete information.

If you full claim and are unelimmable then scum have to push somewhere else. People fly off your wagon like it’s allergies.

i really *really* don't buy there's a claim out there that would make you change your mind from "he's scum" into "he's unyeetable". i think you're scum desperate for breathing room.

Who do you think my partner is then Math? I'll talk to you about any player you want, give you some more associatives you love.

no offense datisi but you're never the charismatic type with casings usually

In post 1906, ChaosOmega wrote:Who do you think my partner is then Math? I'll talk to you about any player you want, give you some more associatives you love.

just start replying in gifs and dont legitimize the push lmao

In post 1902, DkKoba wrote:

In post 1899, Titus wrote:You're going against locktown Math and trying to go after his extremely confident clear. It's not happening. Even if you think Chaos is scum, he has a partner.

In what world is math locktown?

Datisti is. Math is pushing against him. Sorry for the lack of clarity.

In post 1898, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1896, ChaosOmega wrote:If I fullclaim, what are scum adjusting to during the day Math? Me not fullclaiming is allowing scum to make a mistake by not having complete information.

If you full claim and are unelimmable then scum have to push somewhere else. People fly off your wagon like it’s allergies.

that depends on the claim
leaving it unsure means scum are firing in the dark

In post 1901, DkKoba wrote:

In post 1889, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1887, DkKoba wrote:You're twisting everything just to portray chaos as scum.

I believe Chaos is scum.

I find his defenders are much more looking at Chaos though rose tinted glasses here.

I am literally doing the opposite here and assuming he is town here Koba.

Ok. I read him correctly despite consensus being against him in the past. I caved later by my initial vibes were right. Case him if you really think he is scum

Will do after work

There’s about 10 pedits and I have a meeting

In post 1904, DkKoba wrote:and make sure to address why a scum chaos would vote their partner on a whim of a case from *datisi* if what was said was correct

omega voted umlaut first.

and i'm not trying to case anyone here.

Its most likely scum tried to kill datisi or chaos and failed and that should make chaos less likely in both scenarios.

ok back to no tryhard mode, i rest my case on chaos town tho

In post 1913, Datisi wrote:

In post 1904, DkKoba wrote:and make sure to address why a scum chaos would vote their partner on a whim of a case from *datisi* if what was said was correct

omega voted umlaut first.

and i'm not trying to case anyone here.

Im saying according to others descriptions on what happened d2 was that you cased umlaut but chaos was first vote

In post 1911, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1901, DkKoba wrote:

In post 1889, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1887, DkKoba wrote:You're twisting everything just to portray chaos as scum.

I believe Chaos is scum.

I find his defenders are much more looking at Chaos though rose tinted glasses here.

I am literally doing the opposite here and assuming he is town here Koba.

Ok. I read him correctly despite consensus being against him in the past. I caved later by my initial vibes were right. Case him if you really think he is scum

Will do after work

Don't bother. It's not happening. Locktown town pool is safe.

In post 1914, DkKoba wrote:Its most likely scum tried to kill datisi or chaos and failed and that should make chaos less likely in both scenarios.

ok back to no tryhard mode, i rest my case on chaos town tho

I 100% agree with this

In post 1915, DkKoba wrote:

In post 1913, Datisi wrote:

In post 1904, DkKoba wrote:and make sure to address why a scum chaos would vote their partner on a whim of a case from *datisi* if what was said was correct

omega voted umlaut first.

and i'm not trying to case anyone here.

Im saying according to others descriptions on what happened d2 was that you cased umlaut but chaos was first vote

1094 made it sound like you were saying chaos was following me. yeah, i cased umlaut later on. i did feel a bit nervous on if i misread the situation and am pushing a guilty that doesn't exist, but once umlaut started planking, i figured it's a safe bet to go ahead and bury him.

Datisti who do you think is scum if not MathBlade

In post 1919, Titus wrote:Datisti

who?

my current pool is two out of math/alch/luke/gamma. emphasis on current, because i don't feel like i have a perfect grasp on this game still, and i wouldn't be completely floored if there was scum in ari/koba/n_m. don't ask me when am i gonna re-read/re-eval/re-whatever, i don't know.

if you could convince me on gamma!town, that would be appreciated.

In post 1921, Datisi wrote:if you could convince me on gamma!town, that would be appreciated.

Full reason is anti-town. His D1 play is solidly town.

I can case better tonight or we can vote Lukewarm

Math is just wrong town.

lukewarm is third on my list currently, and he's v/la anyway so don't think there's too much point in wagoning him right this moment.

pedit: sure hope so.