Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2021 4:04 pm
And nahIn post 1894, Tracer.Bullet wrote:Your scumread is based on generalities that are meaningless
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
And nahIn post 1894, Tracer.Bullet wrote:Your scumread is based on generalities that are meaningless
In post 1902, Dwlee99 wrote:You want me to be super uber confident about a day one read without any flips jeez
This reminds me of something one sec
In post 1902, Dwlee99 wrote:You want me to be super uber confident about a day one read without any flips jeez
This reminds me of something one sec
Just like, read my ISO from here. Include loftwing in itIn post 372, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: Regrider
Why would "waste your fudge roll" even be a reason to scumread someone
In post 569, Dwlee99 wrote:Like here game is totally dead, I want a Regrider flip, we go into night and then come back tomorrow. That's what's going to help us here the most
In post 570, Loftwing wrote:You haven't intentionally gotten into the thick of an argument, you haven't been calling out things that you disagree with, you haven't tried playing the game until I dragged your unwilling ass into it.In post 567, Dwlee99 wrote:I have more posts than 9/12 of the other players. How tf am I absent here
Also, you like to airate your posts, shooting out short disconnected ideas, which would boost up your post count without actually having more substance than most players.
In post 572, Dwlee99 wrote:What arguments? All I've seen is boring mech discussion and Cyrus being Cyrus. Closest thing otherwise to an argument is explaining why a low poster who reacted badly to a simple push is likely to be scum and you thinking I'm scum for not having an essay level read on someone with 13 posts
In post 580, Dwlee99 wrote:Regrider please instead
In post 589, Loftwing wrote:I'm not expecting you to have omniscience of the game. I'm expecting you to put your thoughts out there into the game more than you have been. You've basically said nothing this entire game, and are now getting defensive that you've said nothing this entire game.In post 572, Dwlee99 wrote:What arguments? All I've seen is boring mech discussion and Cyrus being Cyrus. Closest thing otherwise to an argument is explaining why a low poster who reacted badly to a simple push is likely to be scum and you thinking I'm scum for not having an essay level read on someone with 13 postsAs above, I'm not expecting you to have a deep read on someone. However, I would expect you to have it if you wanted them dead (which you very clearly seem to do). It is not my fault that you've shown that you want a player with 13 posts dead despite not having many good reasons for wanting them dead.In post 578, Dwlee99 wrote:And funny enough, you gave me the same crap last time we playedThat I'm not being reasonable enough or giving enough reasons. And I was town and we ended up hard stomping scum in that game with my help.In post 701, Loftwing wrote:.
Secondly, VOTE: Dwlee
I'm sure you're a perfectly healthy and mentally stable player, so why are you seemingly unwilling to give a reasonable response to Wake, rather than playing this weird "I'm not touching you" style game?
So maybe this method of reading me based on me not having super deep reasons to scumread someone (with 13 posts btw) isn't effective?
Here ya go, I even grabbed some of the conversation for youIn post 590, Dwlee99 wrote:Loftwing I've explained the reasons. Idk what more you expect from me on a player with that little content
Wow you're like, at best 1/3 on thisIn post 1912, Tracer.Bullet wrote:the team is probably just April/Dlee/T3
I mean the situation is the same...In post 1910, Tracer.Bullet wrote:Is this some kind of joke where you cherry pick shit from your past where you were right and expect me to do no DD and just nod and believe you.
Ok so why you pretending you don't have conviction if you think Holiday will REALLY flip scumIn post 1916, Dwlee99 wrote:I mean the situation is the same...In post 1910, Tracer.Bullet wrote:Is this some kind of joke where you cherry pick shit from your past where you were right and expect me to do no DD and just nod and believe you.
I'm like, yea, person scummy, let's just kill em
Then someone comes arguing with me for multiple pages about how I'm scum or something cause I should ~elaborate~ and ~explain~ more in depth
And then I just go "kill person" and if they flip red it'll REALLY be the same
That's not meta though?In post 1915, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Ur like: "check out this previous game as i liken it to this game for a point i’m making"
Where did I say that??In post 1917, Tracer.Bullet wrote:Ok so why you pretending you don't have conviction if you think Holiday will REALLY flip scumIn post 1916, Dwlee99 wrote:I mean the situation is the same...In post 1910, Tracer.Bullet wrote:Is this some kind of joke where you cherry pick shit from your past where you were right and expect me to do no DD and just nod and believe you.
I'm like, yea, person scummy, let's just kill em
Then someone comes arguing with me for multiple pages about how I'm scum or something cause I should ~elaborate~ and ~explain~ more in depth
And then I just go "kill person" and if they flip red it'll REALLY be the same
In post 1884, Dwlee99 wrote:You're also way overplaying my confidence with thisIn post 1880, Tracer.Bullet wrote:How are you so sure Holiday flips scum here if you don't actually have time to play?
I will never clear someone off their reaction to a fake hammer. That's just terrible playIn post 1920, Tracer.Bullet wrote:I already find your explanation of "it's my policy never to believe fakehammers" to be very hard to believe.
You're lucky I can't use site search right now to see what your fakehammer history is.
This isn't me saying I "REALLY" thing holiday will flip scum soooo???In post 1921, Tracer.Bullet wrote:In post 1884, Dwlee99 wrote:You're also way overplaying my confidence with thisIn post 1880, Tracer.Bullet wrote:How are you so sure Holiday flips scum here if you don't actually have time to play?