Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2022 7:44 am
I assume that was a typo on your part since you know I'm town this game...In post 1898, VP Baltar wrote:A thing you would never say as townIn post 1897, imaginality wrote:mistyped it as town
I assume that was a typo on your part since you know I'm town this game...In post 1898, VP Baltar wrote:A thing you would never say as townIn post 1897, imaginality wrote:mistyped it as town
you've told jokes that are actually funny. That was clearly not a joke, just a mindset slip.In post 1903, imaginality wrote:My explanation was clearly a joke.
?In post 1898, VP Baltar wrote:A thing you would never say as townIn post 1897, imaginality wrote:mistyped it as town
In post 1902, VP Baltar wrote:As town you'd just correct a typo. No big deal. As scum, you feel compelled to give an explanation.
It's Day 2. It's occasional but last time that this happened, I was spectating the game. I didn't write it down but I was confident in who the Mafia was after DaTacoX NKed catboi. I dod write down postgame that I suspected him for having the 'best reason' like how I felt about Lukewarm and his desire to win Keep.In post 1890, Tanner wrote:rh9, how often do you usually have scumreads on day 1?
In post 485, RH9 wrote:Well done! To be fair, I just a little suspicious when catboi was NKed. It felt like it was a fearkill because of what happened last time. And then, when hops was NKed, I was like, whoever's Mafia just keeps on fearkilling. Which was what even got me to doubt you, DaTacoX. I felt like you had the best reason to fear catboi because they called you out in this post. Sorry if this feels too harsh, especially since it wasn't your fault that you had to carry the whole Mafia team for three whole days. And well done Meg for tracking DaTacoX and hops for protecting Meg. And well done, everybody else!
OK. I don't think that I got an reaction from numberQ anyways.In post 1885, VP Baltar wrote:RH9, will you please unvote so Tanner can make a decision?
This is kind of true, but I also know if Tanner just hammers imaginality we can celebrate. I actually really don't want this game to go to the wall because I think it's a very low information game still somehow.In post 1914, RH9 wrote:But Baltar is right, you need to hammer soon or we might not get time to flip the Wall if you make a mistake.
I'd be surprised but i mean, i would still know VP is scum! I'd be worried Tanner would mislim me if you flip town though. I think it's better we flip VP at Gate and win whatever the reality at Wall isIn post 1909, implosion wrote:imag, what would your reaction be if Wall was resolved incorrectly and I flipped town?
If Baltar is scum, then we won't need to deal with the Wall.In post 1919, imaginality wrote:I'd be surprised but i mean, i would still know VP is scum! I'd be worried Tanner would mislim me if you flip town though. I think it's better we flip VP at Gate and win whatever the reality at Wall isIn post 1909, implosion wrote:imag, what would your reaction be if Wall was resolved incorrectly and I flipped town?
?In post 1920, RH9 wrote:If Baltar is scum, then we won't need to deal with the Wall.
I just think that's how scum interact with their buddies naturally. It takes work to scum theater, whereas having low level disagreements with town players is very easy to do.In post 1917, Tanner wrote:baltar, why do you think i should find the "luke bickered with me a lot but barely spoke to imaginality" argument convincing?