Mafiascum.net

In post 1924, ArcAngel9 wrote:Please sow down and Listen to us, Majiffy is a bad ass player

nah, he's not really.

In post 1918, Jake from State Farm wrote:AA9 - if you protected Selkies and we had a NK last night, why would you think that Selkies was scum? Wouldn't you think your BG stopped the kill?

Wait, I am confused with your question, You said you were targeted last night, didn't you?
And If Selkies was targeted last night, I would have taken bullet for them, since that i am alive, they weren't targetted last night , i only had 1 shot BG, I can't protect anyone after this.

Oh my god AA9 you are making literally no sense and what's worse is that you don't even see it.

We lynch Jen. She flips scum. Tonight, our hydra dies.

What new information do you have to ascertain Majiffy's alignment? Fucking NONE.

Seeing as your lynch target of Majiffy tomorrow CANNOT CHANGE, we are lynching Majiffy today.

Now go vote.

In post 1920, RachMarie wrote:wait a min Arc is a bodyguard?

Shouldnt she have died then? I thought they die when they protect someone, unlike Doc?

Read the game doll...

And btw, I have a better feeling about Rach after this, IF she is the scum she would have already known this by now

In post 1926, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 1918, Jake from State Farm wrote:AA9 - if you protected Selkies and we had a NK last night, why would you think that Selkies was scum? Wouldn't you think your BG stopped the kill?

Wait, I am confused with your question, You said you were targeted last night, didn't you?
And If Selkies was targeted last night, I would have taken bullet for them, since that i am alive, they weren't targetted last night , i only had 1 shot BG, I can't protect anyone after this.

I assumed I was targeted last night, I have no clue. I thought when you claimed bodyguard you were also claiming to stop the kill but I forgot that bg dies, which means I was actually targeted (unless mafia NK'd)

This is what i don't understand

why would mafia target me if sven had already claimed 1 shot BP?

If you were not claiming protection on Selkies, why did you claim like you did?

ugh, my mind is confused.

Jake, speaking as only half the hydra, I'd choose to go along with your choice today, knowing that tomorrow is probably your headache, not mine.

Personally, I think Majiffy is the more dangerous of the two and he is the one I want to lynch.

- f

In post 1927, Selkies wrote:Oh my god AA9 you are making literally no sense and what's worse is that you don't even see it.

We lynch Jen. She flips scum. Tonight, our hydra dies.

What new information do you have to ascertain Majiffy's alignment? Fucking NONE.

Seeing as your lynch target of Majiffy tomorrow CANNOT CHANGE, we are lynching Majiffy today.

Now go vote.

Why are you so afraid being night killed and what makes you so sure that scum will only night kill you, even if you're dead, you didn't die in Vain, the rest of the group will lynch the last scum tomorrow and gets the victory for all of us.

In post 1928, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 1920, RachMarie wrote:wait a min Arc is a bodyguard?

Shouldnt she have died then? I thought they die when they protect someone, unlike Doc?

Read the game doll...

And btw, I have a better feeling about Rach after this, IF she is the scum she would have already known this by now

please just stop posting and lynch majiffy because i really want to stop talking to you but I can't before majiffy is lynched

i will happily refrain from playing in any future games with you

your arguments make no sense, i have rebutted them one by one by one and you are making no. fucking. sense.


lynch majiffy, sheep the IC


pedit: WE ARE CONFIRMED TOWN YOU DOLT AND ONCE MORE I DO NOT TRUST IN YOUR ABILITY TO LYNCH MAJIFFY TOMORROW BECAUSE I NOW KNOW HOW BAD OF A PLAYER YOU ARE

In post 1929, Jake from State Farm wrote:

In post 1926, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 1918, Jake from State Farm wrote:AA9 - if you protected Selkies and we had a NK last night, why would you think that Selkies was scum? Wouldn't you think your BG stopped the kill?

Wait, I am confused with your question, You said you were targeted last night, didn't you?
And If Selkies was targeted last night, I would have taken bullet for them, since that i am alive, they weren't targetted last night , i only had 1 shot BG, I can't protect anyone after this.

I assumed I was targeted last night, I have no clue. I thought when you claimed bodyguard you were also claiming to stop the kill but I forgot that bg dies, which means I was actually targeted (unless mafia NK'd)

This is what i don't understand

why would mafia target me if sven had already claimed 1 shot BP?

If you were not claiming protection on Selkies, why did you claim like you did?

ugh, my mind is confused.

I can think of 2 reasons - 1) they missed the post. 2) they thought it was a fake claim or gambit.

I want Jenn to answer my question AND I want to re-read some things

the re-read won't happen tonight cause it's my anniversary and the wifey won't like that too much.

In post 1934, Jake from State Farm wrote:I want Jenn to answer my question AND I want to re-read some things

the re-read won't happen tonight cause it's my anniversary and the wifey won't like that too much.

Please

Just

In post 1929, Jake from State Farm wrote:

In post 1926, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 1918, Jake from State Farm wrote:AA9 - if you protected Selkies and we had a NK last night, why would you think that Selkies was scum? Wouldn't you think your BG stopped the kill?

Wait, I am confused with your question, You said you were targeted last night, didn't you?
And If Selkies was targeted last night, I would have taken bullet for them, since that i am alive, they weren't targetted last night , i only had 1 shot BG, I can't protect anyone after this.

I assumed I was targeted last night, I have no clue. I thought when you claimed bodyguard you were also claiming to stop the kill but I forgot that bg dies, which means I was actually targeted (unless mafia NK'd)

This is what i don't understand

why would mafia target me if sven had already claimed 1 shot BP?

If you were not claiming protection on Selkies, why did you claim like you did?

ugh, my mind is confused.

Jake, there were so many fake claims flauting around, May be mafia never believed sven BP claim..
yeah it makes sense to me that it is idiotic them to target you.. I don't understand it either.

In post 1935, Selkies wrote:

In post 1934, Jake from State Farm wrote:I want Jenn to answer my question AND I want to re-read some things

the re-read won't happen tonight cause it's my anniversary and the wifey won't like that too much.

Please

Just

Please.

Please don't try to rush me. There is no rush. I also want majiffy to bow down and kiss the ring of towniness.

In post 1932, Selkies wrote:

In post 1928, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 1920, RachMarie wrote:wait a min Arc is a bodyguard?

Shouldnt she have died then? I thought they die when they protect someone, unlike Doc?

Read the game doll...

And btw, I have a better feeling about Rach after this, IF she is the scum she would have already known this by now

please just stop posting and lynch majiffy because i really want to stop talking to you but I can't before majiffy is lynched

i will happily refrain from playing in any future games with you

your arguments make no sense, i have rebutted them one by one by one and you are making no. fucking. sense.


lynch majiffy, sheep the IC


pedit: WE ARE CONFIRMED TOWN YOU DOLT AND ONCE MORE I DO NOT TRUST IN YOUR ABILITY TO LYNCH MAJIFFY TOMORROW BECAUSE I NOW KNOW HOW BAD OF A PLAYER YOU ARE

don't try to piss me off. I get worse than you..
so shut up and play with the team. Remember that you don't win this game alone and not without team work. I don't want to jump in to wagons without making sure that we get the scum for good. Jake can see that.. Why can't you.. I don't care what you think about me, and btw you would be doing me a favor for not signing in a game i am playing, I said this to you before. you don't repeat it. Please do that for sake of god.

In post 1937, Jake from State Farm wrote:

In post 1935, Selkies wrote:

In post 1934, Jake from State Farm wrote:I want Jenn to answer my question AND I want to re-read some things

the re-read won't happen tonight cause it's my anniversary and the wifey won't like that too much.

Please

Just

Please.

Please don't try to rush me. There is no rush. I also want majiffy to bow down and kiss the ring of towniness.

I agree!!!!

In post 1937, Jake from State Farm wrote:

In post 1935, Selkies wrote:

In post 1934, Jake from State Farm wrote:I want Jenn to answer my question AND I want to re-read some things

the re-read won't happen tonight cause it's my anniversary and the wifey won't like that too much.

Please

Just

Please.

Please don't try to rush me. There is no rush. I also want majiffy to bow down and kiss the ring of towniness.

There is no rush IMO.

- f

Our vote is staying on Majiffy for the rest of the day. I have nothing more to say.

Bye.

Orc I do ♥ you but you really need to settle down a tad, it is not like the day is on deadline here..

BTW

Just sos you know

If we lynch Jen today, and then your hydra dies in the niight, would liynch Jiffy tomorrow...

Obviously you missed part of the memo on my following the flowchart...
Never leave Jiffy alive in LYLO, if he gets that far he is scum and lynch him...

That's good to read, Rach. I'm at the point now where I'm more worried about AA wandering out into the weeds than you doing so.

^^ - f

(probably obvious)

yeah I figured that fery

I can tell the difference tween you two.

Oh, wait, I get a 'bah' post!

This game has so much posting and fluff that thinking about it makes me queasy.
I hope you guys are happy with my lynch.

Dead people stay dead...^

Rach, if you want to vote Jen, why is your vote on Majiffy?

Jesus 4 fucking pages?

I'll get to this later tonight.