Mafiascum.net

For the love of Christ fine.

Okay, so I think I might get what’s going on here, someone remind me to bring it up tomorrow.

We are still lynching Mastina.

In post 1924, Slaxx wrote:Why does “it doesn’t benefit her” lead you to “she doesn’t know what it is”?

Because, I can’t see any motivation for her to send us what she did and she claimed not to know what that is and based on this, I see no reason to disbelieve her.

Why does Mastina - let alone ANYONE send us a rolechange, that is completely useless to her position in the game?

Tell me how that even remotely makes any sense at all.

In post 1925, Slaxx wrote:For the love of Christ fine.

Okay, so I think I might get what’s going on here

, someone remind me to bring it up tomorrow.

We are still lynching Mastina.

You’re probably wrong?

Like you were on tw?

In post 1926, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:

In post 1924, Slaxx wrote:Why does “it doesn’t benefit her” lead you to “she doesn’t know what it is”?

Because, I can’t see any motivation for her to send us what she did and she claimed not to know what that is and based on this, I see no reason to disbelieve her.

Why does Mastina - let alone ANYONE send us a rolechange, that is completely useless to her position in the game?

Tell me how that even remotely makes any sense at all.

If the mechanic was forced, like I assume skitter receiving her thong was.

In post 1927, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:

In post 1925, Slaxx wrote:For the love of Christ fine.

Okay, so I think I might get what’s going on here

, someone remind me to bring it up tomorrow.

We are still lynching Mastina.

You’re probably wrong?

Like you were on tw?

First of all, that “I think I know what’s going on here” thing was in your defense, I was being purposefully vague. You’re fucking insufferable.

Secondly, for someone who thinks I’m scum, you sure are enjoying needling me and taunting me for being wrong on TW a lot. Aren’t you supposed to think I did that on purpose? And by the way, knew he was lying about the claim, so, half-wrong.

In post 1928, Slaxx wrote:

In post 1926, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:

In post 1924, Slaxx wrote:Why does “it doesn’t benefit her” lead you to “she doesn’t know what it is”?

Because, I can’t see any motivation for her to send us what she did and she claimed not to know what that is and based on this, I see no reason to disbelieve her.

Why does Mastina - let alone ANYONE send us a rolechange, that is completely useless to her position in the game?

Tell me how that even remotely makes any sense at all.

If the mechanic was forced, like I assume skitter receiving her thong was.

I’m not following. However, I will also tell you that what she sent us has no scum utility whatsoever. IOW, no scum would ever KNOWINGLY send us what she did. Our rolechange may be relatively useless but 100% townbased.

Oh got what a terrible typo

Thing*

In post 1930, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:

In post 1928, Slaxx wrote:

In post 1926, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:

In post 1924, Slaxx wrote:Why does “it doesn’t benefit her” lead you to “she doesn’t know what it is”?

Because, I can’t see any motivation for her to send us what she did and she claimed not to know what that is and based on this, I see no reason to disbelieve her.

Why does Mastina - let alone ANYONE send us a rolechange, that is completely useless to her position in the game?

Tell me how that even remotely makes any sense at all.

If the mechanic was forced, like I assume skitter receiving her thong was.

I’m not following. However, I will also tell you that what she sent us has no scum utility whatsoever. IOW, no scum would ever KNOWINGLY send us what she did. Our rolechange may be relatively useless but 100% townbased.

Have you not been following along at all? I don’t think they would choose to give skitter what they did. It was forced.

In post 1929, Slaxx wrote:

In post 1927, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:

In post 1925, Slaxx wrote:For the love of Christ fine.

Okay, so I think I might get what’s going on here

, someone remind me to bring it up tomorrow.

We are still lynching Mastina.

You’re probably wrong?

Like you were on tw?

First of all, that “I think I know what’s going on here” thing was in your defense, I was being purposefully vague. You’re fucking insufferable.

Secondly, for someone who thinks I’m scum, you sure are enjoying needling me and taunting me for being wrong on TW a lot. Aren’t you supposed to think I did that on purpose? And by the way, knew he was lying about the claim, so, half-wrong.

A) I <3 you too.

B) I was tr you, until the point where I read that you were singling us out, apart from the mass claim, to claim today, when our doing so has absolutely no benefit to town.

If I thought doing so would be more beneficial to sorting Mastina, then to massclaiming on D3, I would out it now but it won’t have any effect on it. All the info does, is based on logic - backup what she’s been saying about it.

If we’re still even alive on D3, you’ll completely understand.

In post 1932, Slaxx wrote:

In post 1930, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:

In post 1928, Slaxx wrote:

In post 1926, Mephistophanes 39 wrote:

In post 1924, Slaxx wrote:Why does “it doesn’t benefit her” lead you to “she doesn’t know what it is”?

Because, I can’t see any motivation for her to send us what she did and she claimed not to know what that is and based on this, I see no reason to disbelieve her.

Why does Mastina - let alone ANYONE send us a rolechange, that is completely useless to her position in the game?

Tell me how that even remotely makes any sense at all.

If the mechanic was forced, like I assume skitter receiving her thong was.

I’m not following. However, I will also tell you that what she sent us has no scum utility whatsoever. IOW, no scum would ever KNOWINGLY send us what she did. Our rolechange may be relatively useless but 100% townbased.

Have you not been following along at all? I don’t think they would choose to give skitter what they did. It was forced.

Not disagreeing on Skitter, just OUR rolechange. But scum!Mastina wouldn’t give us or anyone what she did KNOWINGLY, was my point, because it is clearly of no benefit to either her or scum.

That last point makes no sense because I’m pretty sure the last one if not two instances of you mocking me for being wrong on TW claim came post-“rolefishing”

Okay

I’m proposing to you that Mastina had to give that out. I don’t know how I can be more clear about that without authoring a children’s book.

P.edit. How are you so certain Mastina sent Skitter that?

Unless you think someone OTHER than Mastina is responsible for our rolechange, it STILL makes 0 sense.

And she also seemed that be extremely upset that I claimed at all, which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever if she had any inkling of what she gave us.

Especially if she’s scum.

In post 1935, Slaxx wrote:That last point makes no sense because I’m pretty sure the last one if not two instances of you mocking me for being wrong on TW claim came post-“rolefishing”

I was suspicious that you insisted we claim and everyone else on D3.

I don’t want to risk another mislynch, I was adamantly opposed to the first one.

If you can explain how Skitter rolechange points to Mastina and why she would knowingly give us something relatively useless but blatantly townie, I’m all ears.

I never said Mastina specifically sent that to skitter? My best guess is it’s factional.

In post 1939, Slaxx wrote:I never said Mastina specifically sent that to skitter? My best guess is it’s factional.

But my point is that it makes no sense for scum!Mastina to send what she did to us and her scumteam to send Skitter, what she received.

If Mastina flips scum here, then that would have to be the most insane gambit in Mafia history.

Hey Meph, whoever you are 'cause you still ain't signing your posts. If you're not going to claim today, let's stop the claim conversation then... Move on. Why is sheep scum?

has this been ari or nancy drew

i want to w read nancy drew despite the terrible angleshooting because blocking didnt work and idk whether to be thankful or not but VOTE: meph

Here’s my final thought on everything:

I think, like Skitter, that mafia having to give this to her is powerful for town.

So, another townsided gift giving role seems to be a lot.

I don’t think skitter is lying about the role.

Gifting Nibbui made zero sense for anyone who read near the end of the night and my thought is that since they knew they were giving out a Tracker role Mastina claimed that visit to cover for the kill. Also, three gifts by night 2 AND this role seems crazy. It’s almost outside of believability.

I’m not for sure what to make of Meph’s claim anymore. I wanted to sort through it today because I don’t trust her judgement but whatever. I’m not moving off Mastina. She had to gambit today because she was the next lynch. I’m not surprised today is shaking out the way it is.

I’ll tell you what though, if Mastina flips anything other than her claimed role or mafia

There’s going to be a huge rant coming about lying about your role as town.

I have some thoughts myself too, two things in concrete: would townPR!mastina change a scum role too? Like, if she hits scum with her ability, does that affect said scum?

My second thought is lynching sheep today instead of mastina in order to give mastina the chance to give her allegedly third power up and lynch her in D3 if things don't add up. I think we'll have more info on D3 about this whole setup thing. Also sheep is scum so let's lynch him

Mastina’s “power” still goes through if she’s lynched today.

I feel way less good about sheep today. But that still doesn’t compare to how I feel about Mastina.

Yeah but I'm talking about determining her alignment on D3 instead of D2