Mafiascum.net

In post 1922, Nero Cain wrote:I'm confirmed to myself. As of right now there are 4 pr claims and that seems totally fine. I have no intention of lynching them.

Why couldn't Firebringer be a scum roleblocker? And just because "you're confirmed to yourself" doesn't mean confirmed to anyone else.

In post 1925, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And just because "you're confirmed to yourself" doesn't mean confirmed to anyone else.

yes, I understand this but its almost like when you know you aren't scum you think/know that all the scum are outside of you/other town.

If Zantetsu himself was blocked last night that might explain why Churros could still perform their action even though Zantetsu claimed to have targeted Churros.

I feel profi is 50/50 chances of mafia.

Let's see.

Votecount 3.03

profii(3)

~ Firebringer(39), Zantetsu(53), NorwegianboyEE(22)

Zantetsu(2)

~ Alchemist21(36), popopopopopopo(9)

popopopopopopo(1)

~ Nero Cain(42)


Not Voting (3): Saudade(49), profii(0), Churros(99)

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

Day 3 deadline is in (expired on 2020-05-26 18:22:53)

MOD REMINDERS

Churros has V/LA through Friday/Saturday/Monday

oh hey look, it didn't count.

he also wasn't in hammer range lol

Are we carrying on with massclaim then?

I think Alch's reaction to me "quick hammering" was weird

we are. I don't know why we aren't just popcorning or just letting actives claim but Churros wants to wield his conf town power so w/e

In post 1931, Nero Cain wrote:he also wasn't in hammer range lol

Yes he was, Churros subsequently unvoted.

i see

In post 1933, Nero Cain wrote:I think Alch's reaction to me "quick hammering" was weird

In what way?

For my own part, I thought it was terrible that you hammered but I was pre-occupied with trying to get my info out because I thought George was going to close the thread at any moment.

UNVOTE:

There's an aspect to Zan's claim that makes me think he's telling the truth. I'll explain it later.

In post 1937, Zantetsu wrote:I thought it was terrible that you hammered

but I didn't?

I think most ppl look @ qh's are scummy and was surprised to no one called me out on it.

In post 1940, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1937, Zantetsu wrote:I thought it was terrible that you hammered

but I didn't?

I think most ppl look @ qh's are scummy and was surprised to no one called me out on it.

I think they've become more common recently. I'm not really surprised by them.

In post 1940, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1937, Zantetsu wrote:I thought it was terrible that you hammered

but I didn't?

I think most ppl look @ qh's are scummy and was surprised to no one called me out on it.

It is true, you did not. Things happened very fast there. I saw your vote and was like WHAT?!? and then there was some back and forth of "did you really just do that", "I DID", and then Churros confirmed you hammered and by that point I just didn't even question whether it was a hammer.

what do u think of me now that I didn't hammer? What do you think of alch not calling me out on it?

we still mass claim? im VT

lets not quick lynch. i intend to reread this at some point in the next few days. we have 13 days til deadline.

lets not quick lynch. i intend to reread this at some point in the next few days. we have 13 days til deadline.

same

In post 1947, Nero Cain wrote:same

I'm treating this as a VT claim

Alch? You next?

In post 1948, Churros wrote:

In post 1947, Nero Cain wrote:same

I'm treating this as a VT claim

Alch? You next?

I jailkept you N1.

I almost hard counterclaimed Fire when he claimed to have roleblocked you, and did soft counterclaim by asking why anyone should believe him. In the end I decided that if he was scum it's a ballsy play and he was more likely Town trying to draw the NK. I think he realized I was softing the CC when he gave me infinite Townpoints.

It's also why I think Zan's claim is true because he could be the even-Night counterpart to my role.