Page 78 of 103

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:07 pm
by Isis
stop trying to posthumously usurp our venerated Master Clown

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:13 pm
by UnaBombaH
In post 17, notscience wrote:I drew town, and intend to share my ice cream with whoever else did as well.
Reference to Vanilla/Neapolitan Ice Cream.
In post 48, notscience wrote:And you get an ice cream cone for joining
This was an answer to Hoopla.
In post 95, notscience wrote:There will be your choice of vanilla, and not vanilla.
This is so obvious in retrospect. :lol:
Good crumbing.
In post 685, notscience wrote:There’s an
ice cream shop next to my restaurant and I haven’t been able to go get some bc The hours I’m working
and it makes me sad

I think they have cookies and cream too.

I’m honestly debating reciting hoops
This could've been another crumb? Dunno.
In post 1044, notscience wrote:Hoops did you ever tell me what kind of ice cream you like
As well as this. But it makes no sense, because Hoopla had already claimed at #844.
In post 844, Hoopla wrote:i am an even-night friendly neighbour.
So either notscience misunderstood their role/forgot how it works/whatever, or they didn't crumb it. Because they did crumb their target for N2.
In post 1823, notscience wrote:I’m curious what kind of ice cream gera likes.
This would've been last night.

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:14 pm
by UnaBombaH
In post 1925, Isis wrote:stop trying to posthumously usurp our venerated Master Clown
I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean, but OK. I'm just trying to make sense of how come we have three dead PRs(???) and no results. :facepalm:

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:22 pm
by Isis
His post reminded me of an ad/article in Nintendo power encouraging people to go to an official, sanctioned, chat room for pokemon fans. It was a moderated chat room that could ban/kick chatters which is naturally appealing for the fandom of a game that is appealing to children. The ad/article felt it was necessary to show an example demonstrating that the chatroom was moderated. But it was kind of a catch 22 because putting the kind of offensive content that would prompt moderation action would in and of itself be objectionable. So the example that was used was a user repeatedly using the chatroom to ask whether Mew likes ice cream. The moderator kicks the user roundabout the third time the user asks.

The idea of Mew eating icecream from a cone it is levitating is adorable. That mental image has always stuck with me.

Neaps are kind of threatening so if the mafia was paying very much attention it is pretty possible that notscience got kicked from this chatroom for asking whether geraintm likes ice cream lol

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:23 pm
by Isis
in my mental image the mew is smiling and closing its eyes partially in happiness. this detail is important enough to edit by way of post

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:28 pm
by geraintm
I didn't get any ice cream :(
even I, who is blind to every crumb, knew they were being weird

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:29 pm
by Isis
Hi geraintm do you still hate me?

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:54 pm
by UnaBombaH
In post 1930, geraintm wrote:I didn't get any ice cream
Actually, unless I'm completely mistaken, you did theoretically get the ice cream, as in visit from notscience.
It's just that they were killed right after/during that visit. :]

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:55 pm
by UnaBombaH
@Isis - would you ever consider lynching Hoopla even if bob claims to have gotten a Friendly Neighbour-visit? :?

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:57 pm
by Isis
I'm not a fan of lynching in general, but I would potentially vote Hoopla, but not until eLo, that seems like the moment for going into that theory that makes sense

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:58 pm
by Isis
what about you blackglasses

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:12 pm
by UnaBombaH
Yea was just wondering.. :?
Because I'm still thinking bob is town, so I'd take that confirmation pretty seriously.
I guess if a similar confirmation would be coming from Bella, you'd be a lot more hesitant, right?
You'd be looking for a Bella-wagon anyway I guess.

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:16 pm
by Isis
The reason you'd put it off is that when that happens if we have any investigative roles they become AoE the following night.

Maybe voting the person is also AoE and I'm thinking about it wrong

I'd rather figure that out with fewer shots in me

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:17 pm
by UnaBombaH
I'm just spitballing here. Dunno.
I really felt like one of gera/galron had to be scum, and it REALLY felt like Galron was acting like one.
I believe in wagonomics to a degree, so I guess D1 needs to be looked at again later.
First we settle this Hoopla-thing obviously.

But after that.
Porkens still feels like such an obvious townie.
And if Isis is not scum, and my read on bob/Bella won't waver, well...
3 scum in gera/RfS/Hoopla/N_M? Not sure about that either.

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:18 pm
by UnaBombaH
Isis, how deepscum are you here?
Scale of 1-10?

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:18 pm
by Isis
Hoopla's play has been so scummy this game that no matter who reported a visit I would still be making certain types of eyes towards the slots

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:19 pm
by Isis
i didn't pedit
1939 is confusing
1 because i'm not scum??
r u trying to torture my tipsiness with riddles

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:25 pm
by UnaBombaH
I was actually checking out what the response could be if you really are tipsy. :lol:
Although I have to admit, I was expecting a cheeky response, instead of a "full-stop"-kind. :]

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:29 pm
by Bellaphant
...surely wagononics suggest that the person we've wagoned twice and can't elim (bob) as a direct counter wagon to town, is scum?

Not elim-ing one of hoops/bob today is just bad. We are running out of town.

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:39 pm
by Isis
Wanna roll scum together one day una

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:23 pm
by UnaBombaH
In post 1944, Isis wrote:Wanna roll scum together one day una
I believe it could be fun.
Although, I'm not at all confident on my ability to play on this game anymore - let alone trying to "emulate playing this game" if you understand what I'm saying. :lol:

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:24 pm
by UnaBombaH
In post 1943, Bellaphant wrote:...surely wagononics suggest that the person we've wagoned twice and can't elim (bob) as a direct counter wagon to town, is scum?
This is what worries me.

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:36 pm
by UnaBombaH
And to not be mysterious about this^^

I do not think it's going to be as simple as that.
I know that I've been one of the more vocal opposers to a bob-wagon from D1, and I'm pretty much more or less locktown to myself (this was a cheeky version Isis ;) ).
I think there's a tone to bob posting that reaches me in specific situations, and I've been getting that a lot this game.
I also think scum would say his slot is mislynchable, and therefore have been returning to the carcass for two days now.

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:49 pm
by Isis
the wagonomics conflict with how I want to interpret bob's dayplay, kinda

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:14 pm
by bob3141
In post 1917, Hoopla wrote:
In post 1914, Isis wrote:I wasn't visited by any friendly neighbors last night
VOTE: Hoopla
Why won't you love me
hah, i prefer expressing my love to you in other ways.

i targeted bob last night. he can (hopefully) confirm my visit.

No visit