Mafiascum.net

Honestly I feel pretty good about my reads this game, I’m gonna do my best to listen to other people’s thoughts but I ask that they do the same.

In post 1924, Gamma Emerald wrote:like do YOU understand how THAT would look like OMGUS?

jsyk I'm not trying to turn things against you with this
I'm just trying to help you understand how your own post looked there to me

In post 1924, Gamma Emerald wrote:like do YOU understand how THAT would look like OMGUS?

Sure, but how's it lazy, exactly? The premise is still exactly the same now as what it was then. What has changed between then and now that has turned it from a "bad, lazy read" to a "wrong, but understandable/reasonable" one?

I'm highly aware it looked like OMGUS and I acknowledged as much in some posts shortly after that I believed, that was before I did my updated reads.

Now here's the interesting thing: In my updated reads, I ended up putting you null-ish. You then backed off.

Why?

If you were so certain I was being lazy and not looking to solve, why wouldn't you push me more there? Why wouldn't you demand answers? It looked to me as though you were just trying to get me off your back/discredit my point, and then were fine once I stopped pushing it.

the lazy part comes from you also writing off purple/noraa as TvT like you did, as well as saying you "solved" the game. I KNOW you didn't solve it, so you're just lazily tossing out a set of reads that make SOME sense and calling it a legitimate solve. So that should also answer why I can think your read on me is reasonable but also think you're being lazy, too. The "change" is pretty much me focusing more on your read on me vs. you're overall solve.

Like to me that just looks like:

"Oh, Towncrowned is unravelling atm. Let's jump on this and see if we can put him even deeper in the hole.'

Then I begin my catchup and make the updated reads.

'Never mind. He's posting well now. This will be harder than I thought. Let's wait and see what happens."

And then you're just back on this OWER read you had. I don't get it?

Reading up

In post 1880, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1692, MURDERCAT wrote:I want to know if scum knows our result. Waiting on reese

who is reese?

Reese is Tracy

In post 1866, MURDERCAT wrote:I feel like tracy can be a compromise for both for you today
I do need to read the last like 5 pages in depth though

We (mostly Taly) would like to talk about Tracy a bit more. We might map it out, but we would like to talk about it more before we settle there.

In post 1889, Gamma Emerald wrote:I was dealing with a whopper of a cold, so excuuuse me for not thinking mafia was the best use of my time
you yourself were pretty dedicated to posting in the council. Why shouldn't I suspect you of trying to pocket us, ESPECIALLY Infinity with how intent he was on seeing you be solvy?

Lol why would my post account for the possibility I'm scum
I said that there was holidays and stuff and not to read much into that

In post 1867, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why?

we wanted the playerlist to post

In post 1897, Infinity 324 wrote:Gamma is town

I think you're right

In post 1879, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1686, Purple Heart wrote:You know what Murder
I'll throw you a bone.

Noraa, Uncrowned, Murder
Tracy
Gamma, Infinity

are you assuming scum in the council or is something else motivating your SRs?

my reasons to TR Noraa, Uncrowned, and Murder are just stronger then the rest atm

In post 1898, Gamma Emerald wrote:why is it purple if it isn't me?

That's Infinity's pov

In post 1883, Gamma Emerald wrote:The last game PH played involved MtG flavor to some degree. I think trying to extrapolate MtG colors into a playstyle means Ali is remembering that game and trying to utilize it to some degree. I might be this guy:

but I really feel like Ali is town for trying to make something of that, since if e were scum why would e bother?

nah I can explain why I made that thread.

I made it because one of my favorite league streamers/analysists sorted the league champions into colors and brought up MtG colors. I’m mostly just trying to apply that knowledge into mafia.

In post 1916, Infinity 324 wrote:I think it’s purple/tracy. If I’m wrong, I’d guess kookie.

Koba/Noraa is not the team

In post 1891, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1749, Purple Heart wrote:Like if its not Infinity its Gamma.
Gamma to me honestly in retrospect, seems like he's coasting and I can't exactly remember for the life of me why I liked his posting.
I think I liked his take on Uncrowned when I said that Uncrowned could be TMI'ing me?

Like I'm not sure about this and I'm going after Infinity.

Infinity just makes the most sense to me.

Why can't it be Murder? Honestly the accusations of "caosting" and "lurking" are EXTREMELY OBNOXIOUSD ANJHDFN INFDURIATINGV and I REAQLLY WQISH Y'ALL WOULD ACTUALLY PUT MORE THOUGHT INTO YOUR READDSSA THO THE POINT WHERE YOU NEED MORWE THASN ONER WROLD TPO WSXDPLAOIUN THEM<M

Why can it be murder? If you feel like its murder I feel like the burden is on you to present why you feel that way?

In post 1894, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1781, Purple Heart wrote:I feel like Infinity saw Koba as a threat and tried to discredit it starting with 159.
At first is vague and somewhat inquisitive, but in general he does the opposite of giving koba benefit of the doubt.
He doesn't really seem interested in his analysis and just wants to the shade the slot.

tbh
I could see this.
I just do NOT want to give Murder a pass when his play has been "do not much D1 > post a lot in the hood to look solvy > post a PoE D2 that he then walks back and accuses me and tracy for mediocre at best reasons"

Do you feel like murder’s posts in hood was built to pocket both players?
I would like to see you flush this read out a bit more

In post 1895, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1794, Purple Heart wrote:that sounds really red!
Maybe you're red and your scumplay is black?

Btw Ali could you PM me a link to that thread so I don't have to dig through this one to find it?

its in my case under required reading.

Honestly the only person I have a strong SR on right now is Tracy and I'd like you all to help me put pressure there for content because if you look at the iso it is empty from solving

Once we get that content we can decide to flip that slot or not and if it flips scum we can start on partners.

And we will hopefully mean you because I think I'm dead tonight

In post 1943, Purple Heart wrote:Do you feel like murder’s posts in hood was built to pocket both players?

Gamma won't be around to answer this for a while, but it would be silly for him to say yes to this I think. My posts were all mech I didn't talk about reads or anything except to in regards to where to track and doc

In post 1902, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1846, Purple Heart wrote:Infinity and Gamma seems possible? I don't really know tbh.

tbh
thinking about the desperation argument for a no-kill. Would this not be the team MOST LIKELY to be desperate for a break in the situation? A good few people had explicitly named us two as their team guess. In that scenario we'd probably want AT LEAST ONE of us to have a solid reason to be townread, no?

tbh I didn’t even know people were saying you and infinity could be the team d1. Even if I feel like the amount if small enough that its not that necessary. You still have some room to breathe I feel like. I can see you making this play about just as much as I can see you not making this play.

I skimmed up. bunch of useless shit imo reading up.
anyways.
I will be fucking mad if gamma is on council again. They've been nowhere near towny and anyone TRing needs to stfu and take a moment to think.

WHY TF WAS HE EVEN ON COUNCIL YESTERDAY?

HE WAS SCUMMY AF AND U SCUMBUCKETS JUST LET HIM BE.

If it happens again and gamma gets last minute put on council, I'm gonna be on caps lock every post tomorrow.