Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2021 7:55 pm
top.
i feel proud of this list in contrast
i feel proud of this list in contrast
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
are these your guesses for a scumteam?In post 1926, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Vote: Manatee
Vote: Dragons
Vote: Medea
------------------
Vote: Manatee
Vote: Spiffeh
Vote: Medea
In post 1927, ManateeGal wrote:are these your guesses for a scumteam?In post 1926, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Vote: Manatee
Vote: Dragons
Vote: Medea
------------------
Vote: Manatee
Vote: Spiffeh
Vote: Medea
you've indicated me and medea as scummates in both scenarios here. could you point me to the basis of that viewpoint?In post 1929, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 1927, ManateeGal wrote:are these your guesses for a scumteam?In post 1926, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Vote: Manatee
Vote: Dragons
Vote: Medea
------------------
Vote: Manatee
Vote: Spiffeh
Vote: Medea[✓]
In post 1924, ManateeGal wrote:Medea- I found myself honestly questioning what i thought of them when they talked about my townreads scumreading them and things became a lot easier after that. people i hold faith in are scumreading them and under normal circumstances that would be enough but there are quite a few things that stick out like a sore thumb for me. their reads feel clunkier then what i'd expect of them but they keep skirting around shit and its getting a little frustrating to deal with. i totally get their business but what theyre posting feels selective and less upfront then i'd like.
In post 1932, ManateeGal wrote:are you questioning why i am not voting medea?
In post 1934, ManateeGal wrote:my vote remains on lukewarm bc i have a stronger scumread. do you think theres a reason why i should be voting medea right now despite having a stronger read on another player?
day isnt even halfway over. im not worried about that right now, and hope to have discussion with others to change their perspectiveIn post 1935, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 1934, ManateeGal wrote:my vote remains on lukewarm bc i have a stronger scumread. do you think theres a reason why i should be voting medea right now despite having a stronger read on another player?
In post 1938, ManateeGal wrote:day isnt even halfway over. im not worried about that right now, and hope to have discussion with others to change their perspectiveIn post 1935, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 1934, ManateeGal wrote:my vote remains on lukewarm bc i have a stronger scumread. do you think theres a reason why i should be voting medea right now despite having a stronger read on another player?
In post 1940, Lukewarm wrote:These are a mix of my reads on the slots, and also responses to some of their posts, as well as just posts that stood out to me.
Spoiler: Snarky Fishes
Spoiler: Annie Edison
I plan on doing more the rest of these in the morning. But like I said, going through those 2 isos was soul sucking, and I simply cannot continue.
This is like excatly my bottom 3 atm. They even mesh decently well together as a team. I do worry that it feels too easy if I, the over gamed and relatively newer player (newest player??), am the one who spotted the exact scum team.In post 1926, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Vote: Manatee
Vote: Dragons
Vote: Medea
------------------
Vote: Manatee
Vote: Spiffeh
Vote: Medea