Mafiascum.net

In post 1900, T3 wrote:My role is a 1-shot role that can get a hard guilty but not a hard inno.

When did you use it?

In post 1923, Save The Dragons wrote:I'm a night 2 cop. I never softed my role but I softed my result pretty hard yesterday.

this makes one of u or hockey fake.

there is literally no way even night cop + night 2 cop in a setup together.

i think dgb outting there a vt makes sense.

i feel like me and titus's roles are the only ones that make sense here.

i still dont know what the point of T3's role -- they still havent hard claimed which makes no sense not to.

and there is 2 invesg copss + 2 other investigatives lol


4 inves is very unlikely. 2 cops is also very unlikely especially 2 cops of the almost save modifier makes the chances veyr small.

i wanna hear hockey's pov on this.

since my guilty was on hockey, that just outs them as scum fmpov. if we ar econsidering there is 1 maf between the 2 cop claims.

but! 4 inves and 2 of them being real should at least signal to at least a roleblocker in the game // rolestopper which highers my chances of a possible fake guilty.

In post 1912, T3 wrote:From an outsider's POV:
Titus is basically cleared.
1 scum in T3/Hockey/Grandpa.
1 scum in STD/DGB.
Throwing in my own reads, STD is like 90% town
I'm town.
I'm leaning towards Grandpa as scum over Hockey.
So, we lim DGB. She flips scum. I check in Hockey/Grandpa. There's a 50% chance my check will be worthless, and then a 50% chance my check won't give a hard guilty.
So this is a 25% chance of autowin.
VOTE: DGB

this post also makes t3 + hockey way worse since std came out as PR.

Looking at teh setup more.


If we assume DGB is villager here then

we have

5 x VT
1 x Weak / Passive PR (Macho Enabler)
1 x Weak / Passive PR (Triggered IC)
1 x Weak Investigative / Commuting Role ( My role)
1 x Investigative
1 x Vigi Protective


1 x Weak / Mafia Passive PR (Galron's role)
1 x Mafia Roleblocker of some sort.
1 x Mafia Protective of some sort??? or oppositive of Protective (signals to strongman)

this is probably my setup spec here
which makes sense here.

and i think i wanna use this as my basis to continue scumhunting

In post 1928, GrandpaMo wrote:1 x Mafia Protective of some sort??? or oppositive of Protective (signals to strongman)

this can also just be basic mafia

does anyone disagree or agree with my setup spec? why or why not?

In post 1925, Titus wrote:

In post 1900, T3 wrote:My role is a 1-shot role that can get a hard guilty but not a hard inno.

When did you use it?

I haven't yet.

In post 1923, Save The Dragons wrote:I'm a night 2 cop. I never softed my role but I softed my result pretty hard yesterday.

VOTE: hockey

Yeah I think its probably hockey here

In post 1931, T3 wrote:

In post 1925, Titus wrote:

In post 1900, T3 wrote:My role is a 1-shot role that can get a hard guilty but not a hard inno.

When did you use it?

I haven't yet.

Why?

In post 1931, T3 wrote:

In post 1925, Titus wrote:

In post 1900, T3 wrote:My role is a 1-shot role that can get a hard guilty but not a hard inno.

When did you use it?

I haven't yet.

why


pedit: just saw ur post titus lol srry

In post 1934, Titus wrote:

In post 1931, T3 wrote:

In post 1925, Titus wrote:

In post 1900, T3 wrote:My role is a 1-shot role that can get a hard guilty but not a hard inno.

When did you use it?

I haven't yet.

Why?

Because I can use it lategame to theoretically get a hard guilty when I can't early game.

Grandpa claims a guilty on Hockey, Hockey claims cop, STD ccs cop.

VC 4.01

HockeyFan (2):

GrandpaMo, T3

Not Voting:

Save The Dragons, Titus, DrippingGoofball, HockyFan

With

6

remaining,

4

votes to eliminate

Deadline: (expired on 2021-09-30 20:17:21)

In post 1938, GuyInFreezer wrote:

VC 4.01

HockeyFan (2):

GrandpaMo, T3

Not Voting:

Save The Dragons, Titus, DrippingGoofball, HockyFan, T3

With

6

remaining,

4

votes to eliminate

Deadline: (expired on 2021-09-30 20:17:21)

i voted hockey?

oh shit i did. lol if hockey was town, would they get hammered rn?

lmfao

unless the team is t3 + dgb or std aint vote yet or checked in

In post 1940, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 1938, GuyInFreezer wrote:

VC 4.01

HockeyFan (2):

GrandpaMo, T3

Not Voting:

Save The Dragons, Titus, DrippingGoofball, HockyFan, T3

With

6

remaining,

4

votes to eliminate

Deadline: (expired on 2021-09-30 20:17:21)

i voted hockey?

lol i realized i just voted them out of pure frustration. i will unvote just in case . i do think hockey is scum its just i dont think im ready to end the day just yet.

UNVOTE:

whoever the 3rd maf is. u played well

everyone should also put their final solve just so that if that person dies at night we can use a confirmed persons reads to confirm.

final reads; hockeyfan + t3

Hockey is confscum vote him

@Titus
@STD

Lol I hate this game. Ok so Ig titus/DBG are both town here since STD's scum. I still also believe one of t3/gpa are scum

VOTE: STD

In post 1945, T3 wrote:Hockey is confscum vote him

Why

I need time to get a final solve since I am likely dead.