Mafiascum.net

In post 1922, MariaR wrote:one day my jokes will hit.

What's the punchline?

Wow okay

Let’s vote out BGC and mass claim. We are at close to half the game claimed invest.

Anyone who wants to be voyeur checked out their target.

In post 1924, MathBlade wrote:Wow okay

Let’s vote out BGC and mass claim. We are at close to half the game claimed invest.

Anyone who wants to be voyeur checked out their target.

What is a voyeur?
What is gated?
What kind of role checks if someone is an invest?

In post 1907, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:you're loud as fuck

and nobody is really contesting you

this implies if you're town, then scum is fine with your poe

therefore your POE is garbage and we should just start limming your townreads

I am contesting Frog

Still think he is scum.

In post 1925, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1924, MathBlade wrote:Wow okay

Let’s vote out BGC and mass claim. We are at close to half the game claimed invest.

Anyone who wants to be voyeur checked out their target.

What is a voyeur?
What is gated?
What kind of role checks if someone is an invest?

Voyeur gets what type of actions arrive at a target.

https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Voyeur

Gated = conditional
Eg odd night, even night, one shot, night 3, etc that list is not all of them

Pooky can if what claimed is true and he follows someone and sees they did an invest action
Rolecop can
Others can hint a person is an invest but not directly prove it

There’s probably others

In post 1924, MathBlade wrote:Wow okay

Let’s vote out BGC and mass claim. We are at close to half the game claimed invest.

Anyone who wants to be voyeur checked out their target.

No and no.

How did you skip right over MariaR's "joke"? Can you explain it to me?

It’s kinda why I want everyone to hit the same target as much as possible and I voyeur it. Preferably someone in the investigator list

That way we either get a likely clear based on the num of invests hitting the target

Or scum have to kill me or waste an RB on a player heading to that target.

Mainly it’s about taking control away from scum.

In post 1929, MathBlade wrote:It’s kinda why I want everyone to hit the same target as much as possible and I voyeur it. Preferably someone in the investigator list

That way we either get a likely clear based on the num of invests hitting the target

Or scum have to kill me or waste an RB on a player heading to that target.

Mainly it’s about taking control away from scum.

Massclaim puts all the control in scums hands. This is not a game that can be broken by mech.

In post 1928, Titus wrote:

In post 1924, MathBlade wrote:Wow okay

Let’s vote out BGC and mass claim. We are at close to half the game claimed invest.

Anyone who wants to be voyeur checked out their target.

No and no.

How did you skip right over MariaR's "joke"? Can you explain it to me?

Yes and yes

And I don’t get jokes being on the spectrum so I don’t bother trying to explain it.

If Maria is a rolecop we have more than enough claims for her to check
If not then *shrug*

And if she's not?

In post 1930, Titus wrote:

In post 1929, MathBlade wrote:It’s kinda why I want everyone to hit the same target as much as possible and I voyeur it. Preferably someone in the investigator list

That way we either get a likely clear based on the num of invests hitting the target

Or scum have to kill me or waste an RB on a player heading to that target.

Mainly it’s about taking control away from scum.

Massclaim puts all the control in scums hands. This is not a game that can be broken by mech.

Do you think scum have multiple factional kills in a normal?

It’s more likely than not we have 1-2 scum in invest claims and rest are town.

If 2 invests say they are going to target
Then I get a result of 3 arriving then we know that 2 are likely town who claimed.

Since I get all actions that are on a target then the only way that fails is a roleblocker or lying scum.

In post 1932, Titus wrote:And if she's not?

*shrug*

Then she’s not joking and rolecop is useless here? I don’t follow

Ok yeah I agree with vote out Chungus, mass claim or don't and most importantly sheep MathBlade into oblivion

In post 1934, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1932, Titus wrote:And if she's not?

*shrug*

Then she’s not joking and rolecop is useless here? I don’t follow

Why randomly say rolecop is useless when no direct evidence of a rolecop exists?

In post 1936, Titus wrote:

In post 1934, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1932, Titus wrote:And if she's not?

*shrug*

Then she’s not joking and rolecop is useless here? I don’t follow

Why randomly say rolecop is useless when no direct evidence of a rolecop exists?

Maybe she’s a rolecop?
Maybe she hates the role in general?
I know I have a general distaste for it as a scum balancer unless scum are given time to find and kill the invests.

I don’t know?

@Furtiveglance What's your pooky read?

In post 1937, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1936, Titus wrote:

In post 1934, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1932, Titus wrote:And if she's not?

*shrug*

Then she’s not joking and rolecop is useless here? I don’t follow

Why randomly say rolecop is useless when no direct evidence of a rolecop exists?

Maybe she’s a rolecop?
Maybe she hates the role in general?
I know I have a general distaste for it as a scum balancer unless scum are given time to find and kill the invests.

I don’t know?

First is a no given the context of her posting.
Second, hating a role doesn't mean you randomly bring it up. There's a trigger.
What's your taste have to do with this?

I don't think it's a joke. I think MariaR investigated and found a rolecop.

That or deduced it.

I think her context makes her a fine rolecop claim but I really think that mass claim again solves this problem.

Then we decide a universal target to “cop” check as a thread.

You can’t seriously be arguing that BGC is some major PR worth > 5-6 invests tbh I lost count.

So worst case scenario BGC is town but I really think he’s scum here.

In post 1941, MathBlade wrote:I think her context makes her a fine rolecop claim but I really think that mass claim again solves this problem.

Then we decide a universal target to “cop” check as a thread.

No. You're supposing things to make her post less problematic just to get what you want.

I don't think letting BcG live means all invest claims die.

Can you just let people play?

In post 1938, Titus wrote:@Furtiveglance What's your pooky read?

Town

Claim seems to check out with other roles

In post 1944, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1938, Titus wrote:@Furtiveglance What's your pooky read?

Town

Claim seems to check out with other roles

Reads list generally?

In post 1943, Titus wrote:

In post 1941, MathBlade wrote:I think her context makes her a fine rolecop claim but I really think that mass claim again solves this problem.

Then we decide a universal target to “cop” check as a thread.

No. You're supposing things to make her post less problematic just to get what you want.

I don't think letting BcG live means all invest claims die.

Can you just let people play?

I am not assuming anything is my point.
You assumed the *joke* didn’t make sense
I provided some examples.

Then BGC is a great kill unless you have a reason.

And I am really tired of your narrative of “if I don’t agree with you I am not letting people play”

I disagree with Frogger on some things but he is still playing.
I disagree with Pooky on some things but he is still playing.

I am just advocating for invest consolidation and to get a “cop” check on a player the thread dictates.

In post 1945, Titus wrote:

In post 1944, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1938, Titus wrote:@Furtiveglance What's your pooky read?

Town

Claim seems to check out with other roles

Reads list generally?

Claiming is just +town in my mind for some reason, so marci going up. I can't really find many mafia but yeah BCG seems a good vote