Page 79 of 123
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 3:16 am
by penguin_alien
Yeah, I would be. Which is part of why I was good voting Jebus. But you present a case for why town-Goat wouldn't behave as he is and don't change your priorities; no mindlessness would be involved.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 3:32 am
by MonkeyMan576
In post 1950, penguin_alien wrote:Yeah, I would be. Which is part of why I was good voting Jebus. But you present a case for why town-Goat wouldn't behave as he is and don't change your priorities; no mindlessness would be involved.
I don't see why Goat and Malcolm can't both be scum.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:06 am
by The Goat
In post 1951, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1950, penguin_alien wrote:Yeah, I would be. Which is part of why I was good voting Jebus. But you present a case for why town-Goat wouldn't behave as he is and don't change your priorities; no mindlessness would be involved.
I don't see why Goat and Malcolm can't both be scum.
Seeing as it's multiball, the same could be said about any two players.
If you're suggesting that Malcolm and I are on a singular same team (which you seem to be), why on Earth would he basically derail the Mutley wagon and try to get one going on me at crunch time yesterday? And why would *I* jump off the Mutley train shortly before that and try to get one started on him?
Please explain.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:07 am
by The Goat
Singular same team = singular scum team.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:09 am
by The Goat
In post 1946, ferretlover wrote:Okay? That didn't answer my question.
I also have no Fighting-Sports knowledge in general.
The wrestler - the role that he is claiming - is African. Not him.
It would be like me claiming Marvin the Martian in a Looney Tunes themed game and you pointing a finger at me and saying "He's from Mars!"
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:10 am
by Nero Cain
goat, did you have a scum read on Sven yesterday?
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:20 am
by MonkeyMan576
In post 1952, The Goat wrote: In post 1951, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1950, penguin_alien wrote:Yeah, I would be. Which is part of why I was good voting Jebus. But you present a case for why town-Goat wouldn't behave as he is and don't change your priorities; no mindlessness would be involved.
I don't see why Goat and Malcolm can't both be scum.
Seeing as it's multiball, the same could be said about any two players.
If you're suggesting that Malcolm and I are on a singular same team (which you seem to be), why on Earth would he basically derail the Mutley wagon and try to get one going on me at crunch time yesterday? And why would *I* jump off the Mutley train shortly before that and try to get one started on him?
Please explain.
I don't know if you are on the same team or not. My current theory is that you are both scum, but Malcolm is scummier, hence my vote on Malcolm. I really don't see how the case on Goat is dependant on the case on Malcolm.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:28 am
by The Goat
Not until the very end of the day, when he posted that bit about the no lynch resulting in Mutley dying as the LVG.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:29 am
by The Goat
In post 1956, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1952, The Goat wrote: In post 1951, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1950, penguin_alien wrote:Yeah, I would be. Which is part of why I was good voting Jebus. But you present a case for why town-Goat wouldn't behave as he is and don't change your priorities; no mindlessness would be involved.
I don't see why Goat and Malcolm can't both be scum.
Seeing as it's multiball, the same could be said about any two players.
If you're suggesting that Malcolm and I are on a singular same team (which you seem to be), why on Earth would he basically derail the Mutley wagon and try to get one going on me at crunch time yesterday? And why would *I* jump off the Mutley train shortly before that and try to get one started on him?
Please explain.
I don't know if you are on the same team or not. My current theory is that you are both scum, but Malcolm is scummier, hence my vote on Malcolm. I really don't see how the case on Goat is dependant on the case on Malcolm.
Do you mean other than or including the part where you suggested we were scumbuddies? Because that would pretty much be dependent.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:31 am
by MonkeyMan576
Okay, but the argument on Malcolm and the argument on you don't have anything to do with each other. There's no burden of proof to link you two together for the suggestion that you are both scum to be valid.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:33 am
by The Goat
In post 1959, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Okay, but the argument on Malcolm and the argument on you don't have anything to do with each other. There's no burden of proof to link you two together for the suggestion that you are both scum to be valid.
True that. You just made me tilt my head and say "wtf" when you suggested we were scumbuddies.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:34 am
by MonkeyMan576
In post 1960, The Goat wrote: In post 1959, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Okay, but the argument on Malcolm and the argument on you don't have anything to do with each other. There's no burden of proof to link you two together for the suggestion that you are both scum to be valid.
True that. You just made me tilt my head and say "wtf" when you suggested we were scumbuddies.
There's a difference between saying you are both scum and saying you are scumbuddies.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:43 am
by The Goat
In post 1961, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1960, The Goat wrote: In post 1959, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Okay, but the argument on Malcolm and the argument on you don't have anything to do with each other. There's no burden of proof to link you two together for the suggestion that you are both scum to be valid.
True that. You just made me tilt my head and say "wtf" when you suggested we were scumbuddies.
There's a difference between saying you are both scum and saying you are scumbuddies.
I'm sorry....what was that?
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:47 am
by Nero Cain
In post 1928, petapan wrote:
i don't have the time or interest for this game anymore but just want to drop in and say
you're dumb as shit and insufferable
, cheers
In post 1929, Nero Cain wrote: In post 1928, petapan wrote:
i don't have the time or interest for this game anymore but just want to drop in and say you're dumb as shit and insufferable, cheers
^too defensive for a townie.
In post 1930, Nexus wrote:Petapan has requested replacement. If any of your friends fancy replacing in, get them to PM me.
no one else finds this strange? Not even Goat or Despo replaced out and I argued with them more.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:51 am
by The Goat
In post 1963, Nero Cain wrote: In post 1928, petapan wrote:
i don't have the time or interest for this game anymore but just want to drop in and say
you're dumb as shit and insufferable
, cheers
In post 1929, Nero Cain wrote: In post 1928, petapan wrote:
i don't have the time or interest for this game anymore but just want to drop in and say you're dumb as shit and insufferable, cheers
^too defensive for a townie.
In post 1930, Nexus wrote:Petapan has requested replacement. If any of your friends fancy replacing in, get them to PM me.
no one else finds this strange? Not even Goat or Despo replaced out and I argued with them more.
Despite my join date, I haven't played as much as most...but I don't find replacing out to necessarily be scummy.
And...you're a *little* bit insufferable.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:52 am
by The Goat
Also, I do not find Despo to be scummy. I think he AND you are two townspersons getting in a pissing match over logic.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:52 am
by MonkeyMan576
In post 1962, The Goat wrote: In post 1961, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1960, The Goat wrote: In post 1959, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Okay, but the argument on Malcolm and the argument on you don't have anything to do with each other. There's no burden of proof to link you two together for the suggestion that you are both scum to be valid.
True that. You just made me tilt my head and say "wtf" when you suggested we were scumbuddies.
There's a difference between saying you are both scum and saying you are scumbuddies.
I'm sorry....what was that?
Ah yes, now I remember. The fact that you voted Mutley rather than Malcolm gives the impression that you are protecting him.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:55 am
by Nero Cain
scum do "rage replace". I'm a lil' hardcore at times but that's part of my charm.
The point is that I didn't do anything to peta to warrant that kind of aggression.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:55 am
by The Goat
In post 1966, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1962, The Goat wrote: In post 1961, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1960, The Goat wrote: In post 1959, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Okay, but the argument on Malcolm and the argument on you don't have anything to do with each other. There's no burden of proof to link you two together for the suggestion that you are both scum to be valid.
True that. You just made me tilt my head and say "wtf" when you suggested we were scumbuddies.
There's a difference between saying you are both scum and saying you are scumbuddies.
I'm sorry....what was that?
Ah yes, now I remember. The fact that you voted Mutley rather than Malcolm gives the impression that you are protecting him.
Not in the slightest. He's on my list.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:58 am
by The Goat
In post 1967, Nero Cain wrote:scum do "rage replace". I'm a lil' hardcore at times but that's part of my charm.
The point is that I didn't do anything to peta to warrant that kind of aggression.
I've seen the rage replace. I just don't understand it. If I was scum, and thought I was going down, I'd take the object of my irritation down with me.
But that's just me.
Re: peta, it's difficult to judge with limited information. One might be having a stressful week away from mafia. It happens.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:58 am
by MonkeyMan576
In post 1968, The Goat wrote: In post 1966, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1962, The Goat wrote: In post 1961, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1960, The Goat wrote: In post 1959, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Okay, but the argument on Malcolm and the argument on you don't have anything to do with each other. There's no burden of proof to link you two together for the suggestion that you are both scum to be valid.
True that. You just made me tilt my head and say "wtf" when you suggested we were scumbuddies.
There's a difference between saying you are both scum and saying you are scumbuddies.
You could say that until the end of the game without voting him. Him being on your list does nothing for me.
I'm sorry....what was that?
Ah yes, now I remember. The fact that you voted Mutley rather than Malcolm gives the impression that you are protecting him.
Not in the slightest. He's on my list.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 5:00 am
by MonkeyMan576
In post 1968, The Goat wrote: In post 1966, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1962, The Goat wrote: In post 1961, MonkeyMan576 wrote: In post 1960, The Goat wrote: In post 1959, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Okay, but the argument on Malcolm and the argument on you don't have anything to do with each other. There's no burden of proof to link you two together for the suggestion that you are both scum to be valid.
True that. You just made me tilt my head and say "wtf" when you suggested we were scumbuddies.
There's a difference between saying you are both scum and saying you are scumbuddies.
I'm sorry....what was that?
Ah yes, now I remember. The fact that you voted Mutley rather than Malcolm gives the impression that you are protecting him.
Not in the slightest. He's on my list.
That does nothing for me. You can say "he's on my list" the whole game and still not vote him.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 5:02 am
by The Goat
In post 1971, MonkeyMan576 wrote:That does nothing for me. You can say "he's on my list" the whole game and still not vote him.
I voted him yesterday...and my list is three people long. Not really a whole lot more that I'm motivated to do for you at the moment.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 5:07 am
by MonkeyMan576
I'm sure.
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 5:26 am
by The Goat
Not trying to be a tool, but I've been pretty straightforward with my thoughts on Malcolm. What else would you like?