Mafiascum.net

In post 1950, Killthestory wrote:if i say hes town, dont fuck with him again

In post 1953, Shaziro wrote:Can you two please avoid the personal attacks? I think y'all might do well to do what ETL and Titus set up early game, take a break and come back with some kind of safe word to avoid things getting too heated?

In post 1950, Killthestory wrote:i think per is town. will ISO to see if it does match his town game which im extremely familiar with and can pinpoint. if i say hes town, dont fuck with him again

In post 1958, Shaziro wrote:I have literally no clue what you're saying, and I'm starting to get the impression that you're scum trying for the "There's no way scum would be that obvious and trollish" thing. You're trying to shout at me about content, but you are providing little to none yourself, and are spamming up the thread. If you're town, I'd appreciate you cutting it out, but it comes off as scummy as hell to me. I had you as a townlean, but I'm on a scumlean now having experienced your play in the field rather than observing the past.

In post 1959, Persivul wrote:

In post 1950, Killthestory wrote:i think per is town. will ISO to see if it does match his town game which im extremely familiar with and can pinpoint. if i say hes town, dont fuck with him again

It's amazing that people think a person has a single town game. My town game changes based on my mood, the size of the game, my role, the playerlist... Meta is useful if you accept its limitations. Saying you can "pinpoint" indicates you don't consider the limitations.

In post 1954, Killthestory wrote:Persivul is SCUM

In post 1956, Killthestory wrote:persivul is town if you couldnt tell

In post 1962, Shaziro wrote:So you're going to just dismiss me saying that I think you're acting scummily and trying to both spam the thread and bluff people because I said I didn't understand what you were trying to say at the start? And you're going to ignore that you're being hypocritical in saying that somebody who just replaced in last night hasn't got much content, but you haven't provided much either?

In post 930, Persivul wrote:Yeah, at first I didn't like how she turned on me for what I thought were reasonable points, but considering that game I can see where town!Titus would remember that game and scum read me here.

In post 1945, Persivul wrote:

In post 1936, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Totally missed the point. I've been doing all the things you are NOT doing, exactly the things you SHOULD be doing - actual discussion, real analysis, transparency. NOT jumping on anything that could possibly give you a reason to scumread someone.

I disagree with the accuracy of your self assessment, but even if it's true - those things have you about to lynch town, so if you're town, those apparently AREN'T the things you should be doing...or you're doing them wrong. I've said it before, and I'll say it again - scum!pers has no motivation to take on town!ETL or town!Titus. In Blitz 1 I took on Titus, but that was because a partner was in serious trouble. In this game, I started after you guys well before anyone was even remotely in danger. If me and TBG were scum, I would have just pushed some other townie. I certainly wouldn't have taken his place. This isn't rocket science.

In post 1966, Killthestory wrote:titus b quiet persivul is town tyvm

In post 1968, zakk wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: killthestory

I will not abide another day of this utter shit

In post 1968, zakk wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: killthestory

I will not abide another day of this utter shit

In post 1970, zakk wrote:Yeah. you're right. And he'll probably get vigged. But damn that felt good.

I reserve the right to hammer Persivul.