Mafiascum.net

In post 1946, JarJarDrinks wrote:meh who cares?

I'm probably gonna get impatient by the time I leave work today and spill what I know also.

Dude

Whoever it is can make their claim based around it

And/or hiplop

Just dont

In post 1949, Vedith wrote:

In post 1948, MariaR wrote:

In post 1947, Vedith wrote:Maria is talking bollocks anyway

I can't tell if you're srs or not Ved stop scaring me.

I'm serious! I don't believe you!

WHAT THE FUCK

Tracker and a watcher is unlikely.

Hiplop won't claim any time soon if he's scum.
I say if he doesn't post by Monday then we take that as a scum claim and I'm only being nice as it's the weekend

Fine

I can't tell what roles would be likely and what wouldn't be on this site that's why I asked what visits

In post 1955, MariaR wrote:I can't tell what roles would be likely and what wouldn't be on this site that's why I asked what visits

This will be a laugh

I think anybody that will be making a different claim then what they claimed yesterday for whatever reason AND anyone that didn't claim yesterday (SLander and hiplop I believe) should claim as soon as they show up.

In post 1952, Infinity 324 wrote:Tracker and a watcher is unlikely.

Don't really think it's that unlikely w/ this setup. But even still, I'd believe Maria before I'd believe Vedith.

But they're probably both town.

Didn't you scumread maria?

Claiming order doesn't really matter to me the only thing I think I f'd up o was claiming before hip and slan but the rest I don't see the big issue I think if scum have pr's they'd be un'cc'd or this would be rly town sided

I think the best order should of been "Who's an invest pr" and they claim last with reports incase we have any cc's that f up the claims not the order person wise

We don't want to give scum info for their claims.

In post 1959, Infinity 324 wrote:Didn't you scumread maria?

He was also trying to call me a liar over DGB.

In post 1961, MariaR wrote:I think the best order should of been "Who's an invest pr" and they claim last with reports incase we have any cc's that f up the claims not the order person wise

Scum

I also believe Ved's claim due to the fact of innocent child and DGB's flip I think mafia wouldn't have 2 types of watchers as pr's and if he's a goon fake claiming a role like watcher is SUPER risky for him that could get him lynched

In post 1964, Vedith wrote:

In post 1961, MariaR wrote:I think the best order should of been "Who's an invest pr" and they claim last with reports incase we have any cc's that f up the claims not the order person wise

Scum

You don't scumread me because you're not shallow

In post 1966, MariaR wrote:You don't scumread me because you're not shallow

I am shallow! :<
Your slip was fake though.

In post 1967, Vedith wrote:

In post 1966, MariaR wrote:You don't scumread me because you're not shallow

I am shallow! :<
Your slip was fake though.

What "slip" I gotta see this

In post 1959, Infinity 324 wrote:Didn't you scumread maria?

a lil bit.

In post 1968, MariaR wrote:

In post 1967, Vedith wrote:

In post 1966, MariaR wrote:You don't scumread me because you're not shallow

I am shallow! :<
Your slip was fake though.

What "slip" I gotta see this

*Softing

In post 1970, Vedith wrote:

In post 1968, MariaR wrote:

In post 1967, Vedith wrote:

In post 1966, MariaR wrote:You don't scumread me because you're not shallow

I am shallow! :<
Your slip was fake though.

What "slip" I gotta see this

*Softing

I asked what roles visit and I didn't think of it as a soft at first but then I re read it and I saw how obv it was it wasn't suppose to BE a soft but when I looked at it I guess it was

example: Where I play watcher doesn't visit but from I was told it does here? So I wanted to see a list of roles that didn't visit so my report matches up/don't have a un needed cc

(don't say wtf why did you say you have a report!) It's really obv I do.

In post 1971, MariaR wrote:I asked what roles visit and I didn't think of it as a soft at first but then I re read it and I saw how obv it was it wasn't suppose to BE a soft but when I looked at it I guess it was

example: Where I play watcher doesn't visit but from I was told it does here? So I wanted to see a list of roles that didn't visit so my report matches up/don't have a un needed cc

(don't say wtf why did you say you have a report!) It's really obv I do.

You said the following;

In post 1888, MariaR wrote:Can you tell me the roles that don't visit?

You then later said

In post 1933, MariaR wrote:I think everyone already knows my role.

You then hated that you softed it with this (after drawing more attention to it)

In post 1940, MariaR wrote:Yeah that was me softing by mistake and I hit my face on my desk for asking

You then fake AtE

In post 1948, MariaR wrote:I can't tell if you're srs or not Ved stop scaring me.

In post 1951, MariaR wrote:WHAT THE FUCK

Then realise I won't buy your fake AtE, so go back to normal.

You're scum.

It feels LAMIST. Just like about 1/4 of Marias posts are. I think it's just how she posts.

Because it's really obv what role I am when I say "WHAT ROLE VISITS"

I wasn't trying to ate there I was asking a question because you joke around a lot so I wanted to know if you were srs and the "what the fuck" was because you have no reason to sr me and it was so sudden

w/e sorry for asking how mechs of a game works (there's your ate)