Page 79 of 164
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:21 pm
by Taly
In post 1918, profii wrote:Why do you care about people being caught up if you caught scum?
1)
It helps bring up discussion that can be referenced for later gamesolving, it's practical and helpful for the town to be in sync and work cohesively out of the respect that people are caught up and on the same page.
2)
Even when I'm confident that I caught scum, I still acknowledge the SLIGHT possibility in where I'm wrong, having a speedlynch especially when we have 11 days left is definitely play that favors scum in my eyes.
3) Scum would NOT want players to catch up on the game if they see a lynch about to happen, usually. Regardless of the alignment of the person. It benefits scum when town has less to work on in a game.
But the most pressing reason why?
Because I know I'd become pissy if I NEEDED to catch up, and I didn't get that chance.
I really disliked
Hit's
hammer when I was wanting to put my readslist up. If we didn't have only 8 hours left in the dayphase AND if
Hit
didn't claim an invest role, I'd be on his ass more right now.
I empathize with why people want to catchup, and I'm not going to let my tunnel cloud my view of that.
In post 1918, profii wrote:On a scale of 1-10 how confident are you in eibirn flipping red?
Very, very confident. Like a 9. Your point?
In post 1918, profii wrote:If you are near the top of that scale removing scum is much more important than people being caught up
I get where you're coming from, and yes, removing scum IS top priority.
But WHY should that automatically dismiss other priorities when it shouldn't need to? We have a lot of time left in this dayphase, and this game HAS moved in a VERY fast direction since daystart.
So yeah, I'm not losing focus on my
Elbirn
scumread and lynching scum by giving others the opportunity to vote/discuss/post.
I'm giving town and myself the advantage through more content to help articulate reads.
In post 1918, profii wrote:I think it’s good that we have seen people remove themselves from the wagon at this critical point- especially with the question mark over the fruit vendors so handy to have Rask in there anyway
Remove who from what wagon again? The only major wagon this dayphase so far has been
Elbirn
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:23 pm
by Inferno390
This should cover all loose ends we have right now on scum!Elbirn. Not sure what to do yet on Town!Elbirn.
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:23 pm
by Raskolnikov
In post 1910, profii wrote:I’ll look over this at work assuming a hammer doesn’t come along
To be fair looks legit enough, I just want to look carefully at if some of that is actually AI - eg activity - are we playing lynch all lurkers here? Etc
I mean the implication, if I'm reading right, and I think I am, is you haven't yet read the case at this point.
Is this right? Did you skim?
If you aren't sure about the case, and you aren't sure about the wagonomics or how fast it formed and no CW and such, then what made you comfortable or give you confidence in elbirnscum to begin with
Because you say like you want the lynch fairly quick too and no CW either
I'm not trying to make you look bad or "get you", I really have trouble understanding any of this thought process
please clarify if you can
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:25 pm
by Raskolnikov
*Because you say it like you want the lynch fairly quick too and don't want any CW either
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:25 pm
by Taly
profii
can you walk me through your thinking on your
Elbirn to L-1
vote?
Because your posts heavily imply that you haven't read my ISO assessments in depth.
Yet you seem completely fine with the
Elbirn
under the pretense of what
have to say about it.
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:26 pm
by Raskolnikov
Yeah that's like what I said my dude.
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:26 pm
by Taly
omg we're twinning
rask <3
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:26 pm
by Raskolnikov
You're making me feel less unique and insightful
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:27 pm
by Inferno390
*Ahem*
Does anyone have anything to add to my N2 game plan?
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:29 pm
by Taly
I agree to the invest on
Sky
I don't know about the
profii
kill just yet, and I don't know if leashing
TW
or forcing him to out his NK is smart right now
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:31 pm
by Raskolnikov
Yeah I'm not a fan
I think detective pinning suffers if public as scum will just send someone else?
I would refrain from locking an elbirn-profii association so early, maybe in a week I come to that anyways but not so early
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:47 pm
by the worst
Taly what do you think scum are doing rn?
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:48 pm
by Raskolnikov
idk why its so common to hard partner spec prehammer anyways
either youre right and you make scum feel a lot less happy about bussing or youre wrong and just annoying a town
you want scum to feel safe bussing and like theyll get towncred... and then you jump on them
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:07 pm
by Taly
Depends on
Elbirn's
alignment, mostly.
But since I think he's scum, I'd say his partner(s) have probably already bussed him given there's no resistance to the lynch and he doesn't care.
I think bussing scum would do their best to deflect attention on others or cast suspicion on other people while they're making their vote.
I'm giving a nice, big eye to people who are shifting their votes.
That doesn't mean I suspect everyone who changes their vote right now, but I'm internally prying into the motives of why someone would make a vote right now, whether it's for
Elbirn
or anyone else.
Hence why I'm not extremely crazy about ending the day, especially with as much time as we have, AND with about 4+ people needing to read up.
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:08 pm
by Andrius
In post 1960, Raskolnikov wrote:Yeah I'm not a fanI think detective pinning suffers if public as scum will just send someone else?
This.
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:09 pm
by Taly
Upon more thought, I agree with this sentiment as well.
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:11 pm
by Raskolnikov
In post 1950, Taly wrote:3) Scum would NOT want players to catch up on the game if they see a lynch about to happen, usually. Regardless of the alignment of the person. It benefits scum when town has less to work on in a game.
This is crucial above most else here
Right now there are too many slots that haven't yet seriously weighed in and advancing the gamestate is essentially giving them a pass
It's a real pain analyzing people vs people when a large subset just don't/didn't have a stance or committed to anything, and an early end gives enough plausible deniability for it (if someone doesn't have stances by the end of x more days however, by that point you can say with more confidence that they probably had a chance and just didn't want or care to). Different stances are comparable but something to nothing is almost impossible to get anything out of and at most you can maybe ask someone what they would have done afterthefact but that's essentially useless.
At this point I really want to at minimum see both elbirn's response to today and especially profii answer to
1948 1952 before even thinking of moving on
Although there is an element in that today may be my last courtesy of fruit that makes me want to do today a bit more exhaustively than I might be inclined to otherwise
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:12 pm
by Taly
I could be wrong about the bussing, but I don't really know what else scum would do given the gamestate
I kind of feel like I'm one of the only people making cases here.
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:14 pm
by the worst
In post 1967, Taly wrote:I kind of feel like I'm one of the only people making cases here.
and.....
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:16 pm
by Andrius
In post 1967, Taly wrote:I kind of feel like I'm one of the only people making cases here.
Admittedly I'm stalling so we don't speedlynch since I *need* Magna and Ausuka in here and he gets back Monday. Like, they're potentially two of our biggest town roles and we need them around. (Also I need my Lucca around while I'm Chrono.)
And I'm unsuccessfully fighting the urge to let this be a POE game.
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:17 pm
by the worst
I can't help but feel like the fruit vendor thing is a fucking brilliant mechanic for scum to be able to utilise.
just for example if town has a loyal fruit vendor and scum has a fruit vendor. is it possible scum is aware of the existence of a loyal fruit vendor?
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:18 pm
by the worst
btw I'm almost never mechanically lucid unless I'm mafia. if someone can casually point out why I'm wrong please do, no offense taken
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:19 pm
by Taly
the worst wrote: In post 1967, Taly wrote:I kind of feel like I'm one of the only people making cases here.
and.....
I think I'm an easy person to jump behind.
-
I push hard.
-
Not many people seem confident I'm town.
So in a scum narrative in a game such as this - like in D1 - I'm an easy person to rally against.
Andrius wrote: In post 1967, Taly wrote:I kind of feel like I'm one of the only people making cases here.
Admittedly I'm stalling so we don't speedlynch since I *need* Magna and Ausuka in here and he gets back Monday. Like, they're potentially two of our biggest town roles and we need them around. (Also I need my Lucca around while I'm Chrono.)
And I'm unsuccessfully fighting the urge to let this be a POE game.
Understandable.
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:20 pm
by the worst
Ehhh. Casing is a playstyle thing.
either were charging into a mislynch and scum is just rollin w it or we have a town dominated wagon
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:21 pm
by Andrius
I imagine that would be information that's given to the scum that would be strictly non-normal but what do I know. \___(:/)___/
Like MAYBE in a theme game I'd be like 'hey yo you know [insert bit about the setup like if you a cop there's a framer] fyi'. Not in a normal though.
Possibly a Scum Fruit Vendor but we have no way of confirming simply based on their claims alone so.
pedit: Taly I appreciate your earnestness and I think you're town. I'm just hardcore stalling since I really need some more fruit vendors in my life and absolutely don't want a quicklynch before
1. Magna and Ausuka come back
2. HitAlt and I can talk BECAUSE I AM *ALSO* AN INVESTIGATIVE ROLE AND WE NEED TO NOT DOUBLE UP B/C THATS NOT OPTIMAL