Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:16 am
He said he copies and pastes his style, not his game - he means he plays identically as town and scum, which is fair.
Page 79 of 107
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:16 am
I need something to cheer up my morning.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:16 am
and I voted the person who I thought had the highest equity of being your scumpartner because I couldn't lynch you. and that's clearly in the thread. so if you want to insist I can't read you, lol.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:17 am
Don't worry, I can calculate pH.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:17 am
*Shrug*In post 1948, RadiantCowbells wrote:your assertion is stupid because at the sole point that I intended to place a meaningful vote I wanted to place it on you.
You had me as scum
because
of the association with Saudade. Where Saudade wasn't scum.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:17 am
it's not fair it's an awfully stupid thing to say.In post 1950, Michael Scott wrote:he means he plays identically as town and scum, which is fair.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:17 am
wrong.In post 1954, Michael Scott wrote:*Shrug*In post 1948, RadiantCowbells wrote:your assertion is stupid because at the sole point that I intended to place a meaningful vote I wanted to place it on you.
You had me as scumbecauseof the association with Saudade.
Where Saudade wasn't scum.
I had
you
as scum and I voted Sau because he seemed like your partner.Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:18 am
Lol indeed.In post 1952, RadiantCowbells wrote:and I voted the person who I thought had the highest equity of being your scumpartner because I couldn't lynch you. and that's clearly in the thread. so if you want to insist I can't read you, lol.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:19 am
Most people on site strive to copy their town meta into their scumgames.In post 1955, RadiantCowbells wrote:it's not fair it's an awfully stupid thing to say.In post 1950, Michael Scott wrote:he means he plays identically as town and scum, which is fair.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:19 am
I'll wait a fourth head say when the fight should be done.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:19 am
Again, /shrugIn post 1956, RadiantCowbells wrote:wrong.
I had you as scum and I voted Sau because he seemed like your partner.
Post-flip your guess was URAP+Shoshin.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:19 am
most people on site recognize that they aren't literal perfect gods of scumplay who emulate their meta perfectly.
even if they were playing your towngame as scum is bad because you're playing to a town wincondition instead of a scum one.
even if they were playing your towngame as scum is bad because you're playing to a town wincondition instead of a scum one.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:20 am
Woah, I do the reverse.In post 1958, Michael Scott wrote:Most people on site strive to copy their town meta into their scumgames.In post 1955, RadiantCowbells wrote:it's not fair it's an awfully stupid thing to say.In post 1950, Michael Scott wrote:he means he plays identically as town and scum, which is fair.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:20 am
Anyway, I don't particularly care about what you *intended* to do that game, etc etc.
Show me how this play matches my scum meta.
Show me how this play matches my scum meta.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:20 am
my mistake was thinking that you/shoshin wasn't a thing because you would have done a better job of distancing.In post 1960, Michael Scott wrote:Again, /shrugIn post 1956, RadiantCowbells wrote:wrong.
I had you as scum and I voted Sau because he seemed like your partner.
Post-flip your guess was URAP+Shoshin.
people like me in setups like that tend to expect serious effort in the not being partners department.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:21 am
again: why? what does it do for me?In post 1963, Michael Scott wrote:Anyway, I don't particularly care about what you *intended* to do that game, etc etc.
Show me how this play matches my scum meta.
it would be more of a token for respect for you if you're town but i have no respect for someone who doesn't townread me in this situation so . . .
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:21 am
In terms of playing to town wincon as scum, no.In post 1961, RadiantCowbells wrote:even if they were playing your towngame as scum is bad because you're playing to a town wincondition instead of a scum one.
In terms of posting style in general, yes.
Asking meaningful questions, having a presence in the thread, things like that. That's what Saudade probs meant.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:21 am
100th post
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:23 am
i wouldn't say i perfectly copy and paste my style from scum to town and i'm pretty close to the upper limits of scumplay. saying that as someone who frequently loses trivial games is pretty sketchy.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:24 am
For my curiosity, but feel free not to.In post 1965, RadiantCowbells wrote:again: why? what does it do for me?
it would be more of a token for respect for you if you're town but i haveno respect for someone who doesn't townreadme in this situation so . . .
I don't care for respect. I'm here to play Mafia.
But then I shall also assert that you lack any solid reason to lynch me, and that holds.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:24 am
i mean
you can assert it
do you think it would prevent me from hypothetically lynching you?
you can assert it
do you think it would prevent me from hypothetically lynching you?
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:25 am
I'm making a charitable interpretation of what he said, not taking it at literal face-value. But you do you!In post 1968, RadiantCowbells wrote:i wouldn't say i perfectly copy and paste my style from scum to town and i'm pretty close to the upper limits of scumplay. saying that as someone who frequently loses trivial games is pretty sketchy.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:26 am
No, but I wouldn't take blame for being lynched.In post 1970, RadiantCowbells wrote:do you think it would prevent me from hypothetically lynching you?
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:27 am
Also, I'd appreciate it if people don't blindly sheep RC and show their own reasoning for wanting to lynch me - preferably outside "PoE".In post 1972, Michael Scott wrote:No, but I wouldn't take blame for being lynched.In post 1970, RadiantCowbells wrote:do you think it would prevent me from hypothetically lynching you?
Or, of course, admit that they don't have any solid basis too.
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:28 am
i mean
you're not townreading the person who led on scum who was near universally townread so...
you're not townreading the person who led on scum who was near universally townread so...