Mafiascum.net

Nauci you think Freddie faked the claim?

I mean, at the time of the claim, I didn't know what to make of it other than ??????

But there were SO many posts after that which were just so implausible. Like at some point, the lack of necessity to claim was pointed out to her, yet she kept making posts over and over as if she was imminently dead. I have a harder time buying her explanation about scum not knowing who town are, that she could possibly have THAT incorrect an understanding of the game mechanics, to explain her scummy, LAMIST posts as if she was 100% going to be night killed. Mostly though, I view with just... confusion and disbelief, and not super alignment indicative. It wasn't until Blair's behavior that I truly scumread the slot. I do think that it has a LOT of associatives information that would make it an informative flip.

What about you? Do you agree with your predecessor?

Blair (Freddie) (2) - Nauci (feathers), Gibus
Gibus (2) - Tuxedo Mask (copyKat), Blair (Freddiethelady)
Nauci (feathers) (1) - Battle Mage (Formerfish)
Dunnstral (Lilith2013) (1) - BBmolla (Osuka, Ironcat)
BBMolla (Osuka, Ironcat) (1) - Dunnstral (Lilith2013)

Not Voting (1) - Alortom (Votato)

ALORTOM GET IN HERE (and vote blair or dunnstral or gibus)

In post 1952, Nauci wrote:Blair (Freddie) (2) - Nauci (feathers), Gibus
Gibus (2) - Tuxedo Mask (copyKat), Blair (Freddiethelady)
Nauci (feathers) (1) - Battle Mage (Formerfish)
Dunnstral (Lilith2013) (1) - BBmolla (Osuka, Ironcat)
BBMolla (Osuka, Ironcat) (1) - Dunnstral (Lilith2013)

Not Voting (1) - Alortom (Votato)

ALORTOM GET IN HERE (and vote blair or dunnstral and praise gibus)

ftfy

In post 1953, gibus wrote:praise gibus

You need to earn that

you're right

In post 1952, Nauci wrote:Blair (Freddie) (2) - Nauci (feathers), Gibus
Gibus (2) - Tuxedo Mask (copyKat), Blair (Freddiethelady)
Nauci (feathers) (1) - Battle Mage (Formerfish)
Dunnstral (Lilith2013) (1) - BBmolla (Osuka, Ironcat)
BBMolla (Osuka, Ironcat) (1) - Dunnstral (Lilith2013)

Not Voting (1) - Alortom (Votato)

ALORTOM GET IN HERE (and vote blair or dunnstral and townread gibus)

With this little time left, maybe less fluff posting!

BBM I think Dunn had some questions for you

With this little time left, maybe less fluff posting!

BBM I think Dunn had some questions for you

sorry

I'm leaving this for @Tuxedo Mask
#1905

Okay so my neighborhood is on fire; if I don't make it back before hammer/deadline, fire probably damaged comcast's shit

In post 1960, Nauci wrote:Okay so my neighborhood is on fire; if I don't make it back before hammer/deadline, fire probably damaged comcast's shit

In post 1882, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:

Gibus and Battle Mage have been prodded.

I'm V/LA for the weekend and get prodded at 2am on Monday morning? WTF? Harsh...

In post 1951, Nauci wrote:I mean, at the time of the claim, I didn't know what to make of it other than ??????

But there were SO many posts after that which were just so implausible. Like at some point, the lack of necessity to claim was pointed out to her, yet she kept making posts over and over as if she was imminently dead. I have a harder time buying her explanation about scum not knowing who town are, that she could possibly have THAT incorrect an understanding of the game mechanics, to explain her scummy, LAMIST posts as if she was 100% going to be night killed. Mostly though, I view with just... confusion and disbelief, and not super alignment indicative. It wasn't until Blair's behavior that I truly scumread the slot. I do think that it has a LOT of associatives information that would make it an informative flip.

What about you? Do you agree with your predecessor?

Freddie feels like a soft easy mislynch to be pushing, but I think Nauci kinda missed the boat and is now desperately trying to resuscitate some interest in it. Trying to justify as an "informative flip" now to cover her back for when he flips town?

Still think Nauci is scum, but would happily lynch Gibus over Blair.

In post 1955, gibus wrote:you're right

In post 1952, Nauci wrote:Blair (Freddie) (2) - Nauci (feathers), Gibus
Gibus (2) - Tuxedo Mask (copyKat), Blair (Freddiethelady)
Nauci (feathers) (1) - Battle Mage (Formerfish)
Dunnstral (Lilith2013) (1) - BBmolla (Osuka, Ironcat)
BBMolla (Osuka, Ironcat) (1) - Dunnstral (Lilith2013)

Not Voting (1) - Alortom (Votato)

ALORTOM GET IN HERE (and vote blair or dunnstral and townread gibus)

Anyone but you or Nauci? Ok yeah, with impending deadline I'll bite for this. Probably means BBmolla is town too which helps.

VOTE: Gibus

VOTE: dunnstral
Talk later.

In post 1965, Aloratom wrote:VOTE: dunnstral
Talk later.

colour me intrigued!

In post 1964, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1955, gibus wrote:you're right

In post 1952, Nauci wrote:Blair (Freddie) (2) - Nauci (feathers), Gibus
Gibus (2) - Tuxedo Mask (copyKat), Blair (Freddiethelady)
Nauci (feathers) (1) - Battle Mage (Formerfish)
Dunnstral (Lilith2013) (1) - BBmolla (Osuka, Ironcat)
BBMolla (Osuka, Ironcat) (1) - Dunnstral (Lilith2013)

Not Voting (1) - Alortom (Votato)

ALORTOM GET IN HERE (and vote blair or dunnstral and townread gibus)

Anyone but you or Nauci? Ok yeah, with impending deadline I'll bite for this. Probably means BBmolla is town too which helps.

VOTE: Gibus

Is your vote based purely on the logic that D1 wagon is bound to have 1 scum in it?

In post 1962, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1882, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:

Gibus and Battle Mage have been prodded.

I'm V/LA for the weekend and get prodded at 2am on Monday morning? WTF? Harsh...

So that means I may be lynched today just for putting waves at L-3 and going away to RL.
This doesn't sound right.

In post 1969, gibus wrote:So that means I may be lynched today just for putting waves at L-3 and going away to RL.
This doesn't sound right.

Don't take it personally though dude - I just think you are probably scum. My reads suck, so we ain't gonna live or die in this game based on what I think. But I have to trust myself!

I think if you are scum, you haven't played a bad game, if that makes you feel better?

In post 1967, gibus wrote:

In post 1964, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1955, gibus wrote:you're right

In post 1952, Nauci wrote:Blair (Freddie) (2) - Nauci (feathers), Gibus
Gibus (2) - Tuxedo Mask (copyKat), Blair (Freddiethelady)
Nauci (feathers) (1) - Battle Mage (Formerfish)
Dunnstral (Lilith2013) (1) - BBmolla (Osuka, Ironcat)
BBMolla (Osuka, Ironcat) (1) - Dunnstral (Lilith2013)

Not Voting (1) - Alortom (Votato)

ALORTOM GET IN HERE (and vote blair or dunnstral and townread gibus)

Anyone but you or Nauci? Ok yeah, with impending deadline I'll bite for this. Probably means BBmolla is town too which helps.

VOTE: Gibus

Is your vote based purely on the logic that D1 wagon is bound to have 1 scum in it?

It isn't, but because I like you, I will give you my final word on the importance of punishing scum for lynching town. There is a widespread issue on the site, where generally scum are not held to account for that, and barely anyone puts any stock in who was on the town wagons. Because of this, scum have pretty much a free-fun to be on mislynch wagons. As a result of that general culture where nobody bothers scrutinising wagons, I think there is a higher than average chance that scum are on a mislynch wagon (because why would they not be?). This is enhanced even more so in a game which features as much distraction and arguing as this one has. The fact I'm the only one who even gives a shit about it, suggests that scum definitely would have had confidence they could get away with it (as they do in most games nowadays). Back when I was here 10-12 years ago, you would always always always scrutinise the mislynches on the following day, and so scum were less likely to be on there, and also it made it harder for scum to get town lynched (because they wouldn't want to be on the wagon). It's just a cultural shift. I may be wrong here, but I'm probably right, and overall I'll be right more often than I'm wrong until we eventually get back to a situation where towns are proactive in defending themselves.

In post 1908, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: bbmolla

This is the osuka slot if you'd like.

In my skimming catch-up of last night's posts, this one caught my eye. I greatly dislike it. It came after Blair had taken Dunnstral to L-2 and then backed off, so Dunnstral at that point was not only aware that Blair was willing to vote him, he was also aware that I was willing to vote him and that Nauci was willing to vote him. Rather than make an argument or reiterate an argument for voting BBmola/osuka, he just slides in there that this is the osuka slot as if that should be enough to garner votes for BBmola. To me it does something different -- I think he's trying to divert votes away from Dunnstral. If he wanted us to vote for BBmola he would have given reasons therefor.

I gave reasons, look a few posts back.

In post 1972, Aloratom wrote:

In post 1908, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: bbmolla

This is the osuka slot if you'd like.

In my skimming catch-up of last night's posts, this one caught my eye. I greatly dislike it. It came after Blair had taken Dunnstral to L-2 and then backed off, so Dunnstral at that point was not only aware that Blair was willing to vote him, he was also aware that I was willing to vote him and that Nauci was willing to vote him. Rather than make an argument or reiterate an argument for voting BBmola/osuka, he just slides in there that this is the osuka slot as if that should be enough to garner votes for BBmola. To me it does something different -- I think he's trying to divert votes away from Dunnstral. If he wanted us to vote for BBmola he would have given reasons therefor.

So you're saying Dunnstral didn't want to be lynched, and is therefore scum? come on man, even I'd be voting for BBMola rather than myself!