Mafiascum.net

In post 1948, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 574, jjh927 wrote:Hmm

I'm not sure my new lazy playstyle is gonna work so well with large themes

I think I'm gonna need to parse everyone at the weekend

HOWEVER
VOTE: Menalque

In post 616, EchoVision wrote:come hang menalque

In post 643, Morning Mage wrote:VOTE: menalque

it's a wagon

this is what I've seen up through page 30 or so just by using the thread search with the term "menalque". It's less than I thought but enough that the lack of momentum there concerns me.

Only two of those people retracted those reads and only half of MM scumreads me and they’ve just been talking about how they’re not interested in me on D1 despite the presence of a SR or the lack thereof

In post 1919, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1899, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1896, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1848, Nero Cain wrote:my thoughts on 3p always being scum despite being able to win with town are consistent throughout my time on site. Not going to quote fetch but yeah...

Yeah so I'm hearing if you take a chevy and switch the plus with a horse, it's now a ferrari. Only works if you're consistent throughout your time on the site though so watch out...

Do you feel like mocking me is a good use of your time?

Yes at least I can maintain my brain cells

*desire to eliminate intensifies* They way you are treating me this game is a far cry from last game. Or you really just that sore?

In post 1947, April Ludgate wrote:My thoughts are Samantha is probably scum who stopped caring and TMI knows the slot is town so they know it actually did get confirmed, even if people don’t see it like that.

That would make me feel more excited than town!Samantha throwing a hissy fit over minor mod comment.

I didn't really mind Tay fakeclaiming mason because I don't really see anything out of line with it, all I've gotten is that it was an attempt to cover for the real third mason. That seems like an odd risk for scum to take imo, but it's not strongly AI.

What the fuck are you two talking about @Super Bowl @nero

In post 1934, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 1918, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1910, Morning Mage wrote:I think Gamma thinking that you pointing to Hopkirk's posts is scummy makes no sense

I actually said the opposite, nice fucking try

Gamma do you want my help or not? That makes me feel better though, I am glad i was reading it wrong

Gamma Emerald wrote:Ever since I starting expressing suspicions and the desire to get rid of MM they've constantly been throwing everything they can at me, it feels like. That ain't town.

I have done nothing but see the positive side of you. why are you switching to attacking us over Ban Hydra ? That reasoning doesn't hold up at all

~Morning

see that Gamma, not a good egg swearing at you like that.

In post 1936, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1921, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 1913, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1894, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 1890, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1847, DiamondSentinel wrote:

In post 1799, samantha97 wrote:k just replace me if you're going to comment on whether a post is good or not as a moderator

Actually yeah. Are we going to fucking ignore this? The mod is actively interfering with this game.
What the fuck is this

What are yall on man?? THEY POSTED TELLING YOU TO FOLLOW A SITE RULE. Then the mod is like yes good thanks for telling them to follow the rules and you think this has game impact?? And some are claiming it's AI????? You gotta be kidding me man

it doesnt have game impact

but it is AI

Is it AI for me to tell someone not to sexually harass another user? Honestly can't believe I'm having this discussion outside newbie forums

gimme a fking break dude, i didnt sexually harass anybody.

Lol what? I didn't say you did. I'm saying we're taking a good-faith PSA and dragging it into this game, and if it was about something people view as more "important" like sexual harassment yall would be disgusted at this conversation.

pedit: The problem is that you all are discussing it as something game-relevant. If you someone says "don't post death threats" and you vote on that, does that make it now just another part of the game???

I don't really think of racism or sexual harassment as being more important than each other. everything in the game is game-relevant and can be AI.

I think Menalque is just one dimensional Day 1 townie this game. Further the game goes on, they’ll probably be better, so I don’t think that’s necessarily worth it for today.

In post 1951, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1919, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1899, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1896, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1848, Nero Cain wrote:my thoughts on 3p always being scum despite being able to win with town are consistent throughout my time on site. Not going to quote fetch but yeah...

Yeah so I'm hearing if you take a chevy and switch the plus with a horse, it's now a ferrari. Only works if you're consistent throughout your time on the site though so watch out...

Do you feel like mocking me is a good use of your time?

Yes at least I can maintain my brain cells

*desire to eliminate intensifies* They way you are treating me this game is a far cry from last game. Or you really just that sore?

I mean I don't treat everyone the same way every game, it makes meta very easy. Also why I'm not a big believer in meta

In post 1950, Menalque wrote:Only two of those people retracted those reads and only half of MM scumreads me and they’ve just been talking about how they’re not interested in me on D1 despite the presence of a SR or the lack thereof

Okay yeah I might be making something out of nothing then.

In post 1953, Gamma Emerald wrote:I didn't really mind Tay fakeclaiming mason because I don't really see anything out of line with it, all I've gotten is that it was an attempt to cover for the real third mason. That seems like an odd risk for scum to take imo, but it's not strongly AI.

of course you didnt mind. yeah seems like a clever way to cover for the real third mason would be to claim mason and force them to counter-claim you

Did it happen more than once?

In post 1961, April Ludgate wrote:Did it happen more than once?

Did what happen more than once?

The L word

In post 1401, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1332, mastina wrote:

In post 1032, jjh927 wrote:Okay my role is like, the worst imaginable that could be assigned to jjh927

Funny, my role is, like, the best imaginable that could be assigned to mastina.

Bullet-Proof Godfather??

Nah, I'm not a good enough scum player to have any scum role be the best role.

Read 1615 if that was in reference to what I just said to schadd

In post 1947, April Ludgate wrote:My thoughts are Samantha is probably scum who stopped caring and TMI knows the slot is town so they know it actually did get confirmed, even if people don’t see it like that.

you're sheeping me here, just to be clear.

In post 1955, Morning Mage wrote:I don't really think of racism or sexual harassment as being more important than each other. everything in the game is game-relevant and can be AI.

I'm saying that PSAs like this should not be viewed as part of gameplay. It's just really disgusting to either post something like that to try to gain an advantage or to call someone out presuming they did so. Some things are more important than the game.

In post 1964, mastina wrote:

In post 1401, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1332, mastina wrote:

In post 1032, jjh927 wrote:Okay my role is like, the worst imaginable that could be assigned to jjh927

Funny, my role is, like, the best imaginable that could be assigned to mastina.

Bullet-Proof Godfather??

Nah, I'm not a good enough scum player to have any scum role be the best role.

Oh, hm

I think I might know what you’re getting at here mastina

In post 1409, Menalque wrote:@mastina
What has superbowl done that’s led to your TRing him?

General aura of towniness, basically. The things superbowl have done don't look like scum and many actually look town. The things he's saying, the places he's pushing, they look town to me because they don't look like scum at all and I just get strong town vibes from his posting.

I honestly don't get what superbowl has done that's led to people scumreading him, other than him having whacky reads/reasons--something that's not a scumtell and in fact I'd argue is a bit of a towntell.

In post 1967, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1955, Morning Mage wrote:I don't really think of racism or sexual harassment as being more important than each other. everything in the game is game-relevant and can be AI.

I'm saying that PSAs like this should not be viewed as part of gameplay. It's just really disgusting to either post something like that to try to gain an advantage or to call someone out presuming they did so. Some things are more important than the game.

i dont think they did it to gain an advantage, but i think their other hydra head and the mod who came out to defend them, might have thought they did.

imagine thinking that a claimed 3p is town.

who claimed 3p?

Cuz if it only happened once, just move on from it, it’s been spoken about publicly here, don’t use the L word.

It’s been so engrained into the site, that I understand why someone could say it by accident, and we just need to move past it rather than continue bringing it up.

I’ve been not using it in the games I mod for like 4-5 years now, talking about it just continues to keep it at the forefront. It’s been discussed. If they do it again, yes, do something about it, but I think we should move on with the game.

I’ll make the warning. Idgaf.




K, let’s play some Mafia now.

superbowl and a50 but they win with the town and ONLY the town, they promise.