Page 79 of 224
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:27 pm
by fferyllt
In post 1948, notscience wrote:Cabd got most of it. One of the first things you said was that Syr fell to the backburner some so I tried to get some recent stuff out of him because everyone's been shutting down different sync ups but that might help you because noone's shut any of mine down yet
Ninja-
I do as well.
Do you feel like the shut downs have been tactical?
I feel like every time Bork and I are in the thread at the same time I get into distracting arguments with him, but I don't really feel like it's intentional.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:29 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
its like playing mafia with 5 russians who know each other super well and only speak loud barely understandable russian while drinking excessive amounts of alcohol. you know they aren't all red so eventually they will figure out who the reds are in their in group and let us know.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:30 pm
by notscience
I've considered it? Cabd has done it some as had Syry. I've already covered the instance if its syry
If it's Cabd, he chose to keep you three separated and feed into my confidence after Xeno to keep town distracted? So meh.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:30 pm
by notscience
Ah, yes. Of course comrade.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:33 pm
by fferyllt
In post 1952, notscience wrote:I've considered it? Cabd has done it some as had Syry. I've already covered the instance if its syry
If it's Cabd, he chose to keep you three separated and feed into my confidence after Xeno to keep town distracted? So meh.
He's right about your play in that game!
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:34 pm
by Vaxkiller
Im not
Cabd, ffiery, Prism, not science, are all playing thier own game
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:35 pm
by notscience
Well yes, but in order to keep it from being an outlier I need to keep my mind in the game and not feed into the confidence too much. It's a careful tightrope.
ninja-
Vax did you ever reconcile those two posts for me? How did you go from "Why does scum protect me" to "Im feeling very confident about my play here?"
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:38 pm
by Vaxkiller
huh?
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:40 pm
by notscience
In post 379, Vaxkiller wrote:
lol this dude is town
I mean there is like a 1% chance hes white knighting me... but lol, why me?
In post 461, Vaxkiller wrote:Its obvious! (maybe not early on)
As scum I spend most of my time scheming and planning (I love it)
As town I just post EVERY thought and sometimes I get a good game (like this one) and I feel particularly bold and and town the fuck out of it by going over board. There was one boonskies game I played many years ago like that.... we lost tho
How did you go frm the woe is me reasoning behind your skitter read to confident in your play here?
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:42 pm
by Vaxkiller
How is the first 1 "woe is me"? Like HOW?
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:43 pm
by Vaxkiller
playing diretide brb
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:45 pm
by notscience
Your first line reads very much as "I will not hold much weight in this game so it doesnt make sense for scum to protect me" which seems like a very pessimistic and antagnostic self-evaluation. This is in contrast to where you called this an *on* game for you.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:54 pm
by petapan
town reads (S - > W)
noddy, prism, dgb, pooky, bork
i need to review the data on bork because that's mostly a read off impressions from memory in the morass. i want to do that, plus pull one more townread from the {ffery, cabd, skitter, elements} murky morass. two if i'm not allowed to selfishly exclude myself from poe. i felt good about ffery last night but did reading while at work and so can't have a confident townread. ben, vax, and syr never leave poe. i have words on the first two but i think neither is an optimal day 1 vote. gut is saying vax may be boredtown but i don't think it'll ever be a high enough confidence read to remove from poe.
(it feels weird using a nickname for someone i barely know, but hey)
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:56 pm
by Cabd
I can clear this up by claiming, peta.
I'm..
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:58 pm
by DrippingGoofball
In post 1951, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
its like playing mafia with 5 russians who know each other super well and only speak loud barely understandable russian while drinking excessive amounts of alcohol. you know they aren't all red so eventually they will figure out who the reds are in their in group and let us know.
LOL
But the Russians are all red ...
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:59 pm
by Prism
You haven't given me anything to talk about. You've had several chances to talk to me about your bork townread or to understand why I'm actually scumreading him. The former you avoid like the plague, the latter you put off.
I'm tired and probably about to go to bed as soon as I shovel enough calories but the ball's in your court here.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 4:59 pm
by petapan
thanks nora i guess you're town now
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:05 pm
by Prism
Also peta I'm mad that you didn't acknowledge
this confession, you were right, you called me out and I backtracked and I'm coming clean all these years later.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:11 pm
by petapan
In post 1965, Prism wrote:You haven't given me anything to talk about. You've had several chances to talk to me about your bork townread or to understand why I'm actually scumreading him. The former you avoid like the plague, the latter you put off.
I'm tired and probably about to go to bed as soon as I shovel enough calories but the ball's in your court here.
i want to, okay? that is my next order of business but given the hour i'm not sure i'll get to it tonight. but obviously this is a critical thing to figure out
Prism wrote:Also peta I'm mad that you didn't acknowledge
this confession, you were right, you called me out and I backtracked and I'm coming clean all these years later.
i'll be honest i have no memory of this
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:13 pm
by Prism
I'm about to go to bed so we're definitely not talking right now, I just really don't know what you expected from that invitation without any topic of your own and multiple dodges of the ones I suggest
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:22 pm
by skitter30
In post 1901, Syryana wrote:I don't really know how to explain this but I'll give it a shot; you're right, there's no specific thing you did in the newbie that really parallels to this game, but playing with you in the newbie I created sort of a mental model for what I think town!skitter's mindset is, and I haven't seen anything from you here to make me doubt the efficacy of the model.
hmmmmm
i feel like i'm playing sufficiently different that idk it's kinda surprising to me that you would use that as a reason to townread me tbh
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:23 pm
by petapan
In post 1969, Prism wrote:I'm about to go to bed so we're definitely not talking right now, I just really don't know what you expected from that invitation without any topic of your own and multiple dodges of the ones I suggest
maybe i'm bad at communicating but i don't want to avoid discussing why you're actually scumreading him, i wanted to go over it and then tell you that you're being dumb and tilted, probably but like i said i'm reviewing the data OKAY
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:26 pm
by skitter30
In post 1940, fferyllt wrote:It's different when you're actually in the game and it's no doubt a better place for making judgments. I agree that there aren't parallels. My viewpoint is probably skewed here.
i'm curious how or if that's influencing ur read here
there aren't that many parallels tho, i def agree
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:29 pm
by fferyllt
In post 1972, skitter30 wrote: In post 1940, fferyllt wrote:It's different when you're actually in the game and it's no doubt a better place for making judgments. I agree that there aren't parallels. My viewpoint is probably skewed here.
i'm curious how or if that's influencing ur read here
there aren't that many parallels tho, i def agree
It was part of why I was scumreading you earlier. You eventually did some stuff here, in this game that I do like for town.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:32 pm
by notscience