Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 12:17 pm
i have seen several softs, I don't see why we'd draw attention to them though. Guill being guill probably has reasoning for this?
And name the stat if you did.In post 1944, morph the cat wrote:Come clean and repent or I'm tunneling you to death.
Did you or did you not fuck with one of our other stats night zero, Mara?
This looks like a soft.In post 1948, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:This is a pretty scummy post and I'd happily kill Guillotina for it?In post 1875, Guillotina wrote:This looks like a soft.In post 1340, Artemiana wrote:I hate to say that im a vengeful person, but sometimes i can be
I'm skeptical of the value of this, considering I have nobody at all below null. If you really want, I can pick someone out, but it would pretty much be drawing a null read out of a hat.In post 1930, Bingle wrote:Who do you think is scum, smart? Not asking for a solid "BURNITWITHFIRE" read, but if you had to pick a name which one would it be?
This post is squishy :3In post 1952, White Fire wrote:This looks like a soft.In post 1948, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:This is a pretty scummy post and I'd happily kill Guillotina for it?In post 1875, Guillotina wrote:This looks like a soft.In post 1340, Artemiana wrote:I hate to say that im a vengeful person, but sometimes i can be
Sorry about that. I kept the post in my car in the sun all day. It kind of melted.In post 1954, Flea The Magician wrote:This post is squishy :3In post 1952, White Fire wrote:This looks like a soft.In post 1948, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:This is a pretty scummy post and I'd happily kill Guillotina for it?In post 1875, Guillotina wrote:This looks like a soft.In post 1340, Artemiana wrote:I hate to say that im a vengeful person, but sometimes i can be
Because if I see them then scum already has, cause I'm bad at detecting softs. So it's better to bring it to the attention of everyone instead of just scum.In post 1950, Flea The Magician wrote:i have seen several softs, I don't see why we'd draw attention to them though. Guill being guill probably has reasoning for this?
Birb, if this was scum wouldn't they do this:In post 1948, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:This is a pretty scummy post and I'd happily kill Guillotina for it?In post 1875, Guillotina wrote:This looks like a soft.In post 1340, Artemiana wrote:I hate to say that im a vengeful person, but sometimes i can be
You genuinely underestimate my ability to catch softs and some people like to hide their crumbs in plain sight.In post 1957, Guillotina wrote:Because if I see them then scum already has, cause I'm bad at detecting softs. So it's better to bring it to the attention of everyone instead of just scum.In post 1950, Flea The Magician wrote:i have seen several softs, I don't see why we'd draw attention to them though. Guill being guill probably has reasoning for this?
If you soft like that you are not softing at all, you are outright claiming or fake claiming.
closer to 50 pages, for spay and I.In post 1961, Thestatusquo wrote:no the thing is that guillotina is clearly town after these last 5 or so pages.
It's pretty par for the course for me. Sorry.In post 1956, Bingle wrote:The admission of lack of scumreads is disappointing
Congrats and fuck you.In post 1967, Artemiana wrote:I already said what I was going to say about it.
I also already claimed the stat. Its the only one that regenerates