Mafiascum.net

In post 1949, Titus wrote:I need time to get a final solve since I am likely dead.

why do u think i unvoted. i think me and u have been playing a very intuitave town game.

i feel like we do so good as town lol. like idk i just feel that duo play. maybe play hydra some day??!? pog

In post 1947, HockeyFan wrote:Lol I hate this game.

lol u said that last time when u were caught scum its funny lol

I'll vote hockey soon

Hockey, you are a deadscum walking.

there is so many stuff leading hcokey to be scum lol. like they are not even talking and promised to reread me again and havent done so and just went off by the cop cc lol. i think hockey is scum that fucked up and is getting bussed rn

alright so team is STD/GPA

Gpa claims his role and hints he has a guilty on one of three players(This is of course to keep his options open)
Gpa cant claim a gulity on DBG soo he claims a gulity on me.
That made Grandpa pretty much outed scum
Then STD comes along and claims cop so it makes it easier for Gpa to condemm me.

In post 1955, HockeyFan wrote:alright so team is STD/GPA

Gpa claims his role and hints he has a guilty on one of three players(This is of course to keep his options open)
Gpa cant claim a gulity on DBG soo he claims a gulity on me.
That made Grandpa pretty much outed scum
Then STD comes along and claims cop so it makes it easier for Gpa to condemm me.

Why can't Goa claim a guilty on me?

In post 1950, GrandpaMo wrote:i feel like we do so good as town lol. like idk i just feel that duo play. maybe play hydra some day??!? pog

I'm in. We'll have to talk timing as I likely have RL in November.

In post 1958, Titus wrote:

In post 1950, GrandpaMo wrote:i feel like we do so good as town lol. like idk i just feel that duo play. maybe play hydra some day??!? pog

I'm in. We'll have to talk timing as I likely have RL in November.

interesting

In post 1957, DrippingGoofball wrote:Why can't Goa claim a guilty on me?

You know why? Cuz I called him out on it before he could do it. Also, he would probs gotten your vote too, so for him as scum its -EV to claim a guilty on You because he gets both mine and yours(probably) votes. Instead, he claims a gulity on me so at most he gets 1 vote unless you find him scum, but again its not 2 guaranteed votes compared to the first scenario. Mafia's job is to get as much people on thier side. him claiming a guilty on u would have brought less ppl on his side

In post 1954, GrandpaMo wrote:there is so many stuff leading hcokey to be scum lol. like they are not even talking and promised to reread me again and havent done so and just went off by the cop cc lol. i think hockey is scum that fucked up and is getting bussed rn

Oh what am i reading now? I dont need to re read anything lol, the teams outed to me. I explained why you/std are the scum team here

In post 1959, T3 wrote:

In post 1958, Titus wrote:

In post 1950, GrandpaMo wrote:i feel like we do so good as town lol. like idk i just feel that duo play. maybe play hydra some day??!? pog

I'm in. We'll have to talk timing as I likely have RL in November.

interesting

Why is that interesting to you?

VOTE: GrandpaMo

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm right. I don't care either way.

VOTE: hockeyfan

hammering this

In post 1963, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: GrandpaMo

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm right. I don't care either way.

hm interesting.

maybe you could be paired.

In post 1955, HockeyFan wrote:alright so team is STD/GPA

Gpa claims his role and hints he has a guilty on one of three players(This is of course to keep his options open)
Gpa cant claim a gulity on DBG soo he claims a gulity on me.
That made Grandpa pretty much outed scum
Then STD comes along and claims cop so it makes it easier for Gpa to condemm me.

ok that literally makes no sense. u had bad reads this whole game and thats because u came from a scum mindset. i understand the std read.

but my role litearlly makes sense for the guilty on u.

if hockey pairs me and std up and im town and std know themselves are town then there std should always think hockey is scum because std is town from their own persepctive

Why are we hammering while I am on VLA?

In post 1960, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1957, DrippingGoofball wrote:Why can't Goa claim a guilty on me?

You know why? Cuz I called him out on it before he could do it. Also, he would probs gotten your vote too, so for him as scum its -EV to claim a guilty on You because he gets both mine and yours(probably) votes. Instead, he claims a gulity on me so at most he gets 1 vote unless you find him scum, but again its not 2 guaranteed votes compared to the first scenario. Mafia's job is to get as much people on thier side. him claiming a guilty on u would have brought less ppl on his side

this is wrong. i explained already that that post was in my pedit. u are just going to wifom territory.

i already said that i could have just dismissed that as a joke and just went on with the vote. it is WAY more less riskier to just play it out then lets say pivot onto you.

i could easily just get a guilty on dgb and forget that u had said that. i already hinted my guilty claim on my first claim post by pointing out my softs which included u hockey. i softed to you. i thought u were town like i said but ur not according to my result.

In post 1968, Titus wrote:Why are we hammering while I am on VLA?

its not hammer. look at votes.

In post 1963, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: GrandpaMo

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm right. I don't care either way.

go back on where i claimed. i signled that it was hockey who was my guilty. i already hard cleared u when u claimed vt. what scum does that. it just makes no idelogical sense for scum to push u regardless if u were to assume i am scum as hockey is doing now.

now what if i said my guilty was on you dgb? then we would have the same arguement here, hockey would just argue that i am just tryna MC you. -- so i just pretain to that information as a fallacy and null // nai.

i was the only one yesterday pushing and advocating for a person on the wagon >> then i choose someone that was on the wagon, hockeyfan at night when i could have just chosen marci or kop the other night

look at post 1846 this is where i stood against the dgb claim and claimed the guilty on hockey in post 1847. ALSO! You do realize i wasn't quick to say hockey 100% scum -- i took the time to look at a world where hockey is town and i could have been roleblocked which is a plausble world when playing a setup with at least 1 cop in there. scum!me just pushes hockey there.

In post 1963, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: GrandpaMo

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm right. I don't care either way.

also if you think i am scum, then you think i am scum with STD. Your partner is voting STD, I think you might want to vote them, lol.

In post 1972, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 1963, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: GrandpaMo

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm right. I don't care either way.

also if you think i am scum, then you think i am scum with STD. Your partner is voting STD, I think you might want to vote them, lol.

Partner meaning as siding with.

I do NOT think you are scum. There is no way in hell this normal game passed with 4 VTs LOL.

I think my setup specc is 100% right.

And my gamesolve is right.

Just look at interactions, the last 2 mafia is Hockeyfan + T3. T3 bussed both of his mafia.

DGB is town.
Titus is town.

That leaves STD / Hockey / T3.

STD CCs Hockey 50 / 50 there.

T3 is 100 % in both worlds. Wait...

Shouldn't we lim T3 then. The only time where T3 isn't mafia is if mafia is DGB + Hockeyfan.

But I really doubt that. 4 VTs??? No way The NRG passes that as a balanced game.

In post 1970, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 1968, Titus wrote:Why are we hammering while I am on VLA?

its not hammer. look at votes.

I saw the word hammer and panicked.