Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2021 4:02 pm
Oh and I'm in another PT and I may or may not have slipped it to the less likely to be all town group.
I am real bad at this game.
-Bell
I am real bad at this game.
-Bell
Well THAT'S mighty convenient because we are a neighborhood with: NOBODY!!! And we have no idea who made it either, except marci thinks cream the rabbit might be involved?In post 1949, Icebox wrote:Hey, so, Bowser Jr. Pavowski, Lukewarm and I are inA scum PT togethera neighborhood and none of us are admitting to making it.
As all good townies do, you shouldn't post in them. It's bad.
I have already done my traditional dunking on of the scum team in these two neighborhoods and so,
for the third time: lmao.
VOTE: OTH
-Bell
i am in a similar situation.In post 1949, Icebox wrote:Hey, so, Bowser Jr. Pavowski, Lukewarm and I are in A scum PT together a neighborhood and none of us are admitting to making it.
Marci who was replaced out long before our claim was out in circulation?In post 1952, Off The Hook wrote:marci thinks cream the rabbit might be involved?
In post 1953, Cephrir wrote:i am in a similar situation.In post 1949, Icebox wrote:Hey, so, Bowser Jr. Pavowski, Lukewarm and I are in A scum PT together a neighborhood and none of us are admitting to making it.
I wish I could cop to organizing it myself as it contains all the finest people, but alasIn post 1952, Off The Hook wrote:Well THAT'S mighty convenient because we are a neighborhood with: NOBODY!!! And we have no idea who made it either, except marci thinks cream the rabbit might be involved?In post 1949, Icebox wrote:Hey, so, Bowser Jr. Pavowski, Lukewarm and I are inA scum PT togethera neighborhood and none of us are admitting to making it.
As all good townies do, you shouldn't post in them. It's bad.
I have already done my traditional dunking on of the scum team in these two neighborhoods and so,
for the third time: lmao.
VOTE: OTH
-Bell
-GE
no
See this is funny because neighborhood slip
Hey, this is interesting.In post 1945, Skybird wrote:I want to clear one thing up as we get started today. I mis-read the pm from the mod and I didn't get robbed night 1. I clarified meaning with the mod last night. :oops:
Also, OTH hard tmi'd yesterday with these posts:In post 1366, Off The Hook wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral
I’m feeling like the points against Galron aren’t enough to condemn him when his claim could do some good imo
Dunnstral meanwhile has felt consistently scummy even after his PR dropped
marci also sus ceph and I’m lean town on him but also a bit tbd
-GE
1674 and the nested 1667. At the time we believed that Galron stole gold from skybird, and had no reason to think otherwise. OTH jumped to investigative to try to appear knowledgeable but it actually contradicts what we thought we knew at the time to be thinking like this.In post 1674, Off The Hook wrote:The wikipedia article I read said Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were sent to keep tabs on Hamlet, that sounds like it could be written as a watcherIn post 1673, Lukewarm wrote:Why are you jumping to an invest role, when we know that skybird has already claimed that their gold was stolen?In post 1667, Gamma Emerald wrote:the thing with why I initially asked for ability flavor was that I felt galron could be a scum invest role who checked skybird and killed wheme, and wanted to see if galron's flavor felt in line with where I'd expect a the scum invest to come from in the flavor
-GE
-GE
idk, should we? we'll have questions for you if we're not proven, ftrIn post 1962, Cephrir wrote:i basically think that's good but should we wait to see if they can prove their thing
oopIn post 1963, Gamma Emerald wrote:idk, should we? we'll have questions for you if we're not proven, ftrIn post 1962, Cephrir wrote:i basically think that's good but should we wait to see if they can prove their thing
-GE
lmao
wait, wut?In post 1945, Skybird wrote:I want to clear one thing up as we get started today. I mis-read the pm from the mod and I didn't get robbed night 1. I clarified meaning with the mod last night.
Like, a mechanical test?In post 1967, Off The Hook wrote:its a test for something else
~M★
Yeah. Leading theory in ours is that there was a pt made for each play, and then if you are in the same play you are in the same pt. See me already out as titania and icebox already out as Nick bottom from midsummer nights dreamIn post 1956, Bowser Jr. wrote:They’re all based on whatever your individual flavor is
its something that would affect me alot but it wont affect anyone else too much i thinkIn post 1969, Lukewarm wrote:Like, a mechanical test?In post 1967, Off The Hook wrote:its a test for something else
~M★
that kinda makes senseIn post 1971, Lukewarm wrote:Yeah. Leading theory in ours is that there was a pt made for each play, and then if you are in the same play you are in the same pt. See me already out as titania and icebox already out as Nick bottom from midsummer nights dreamIn post 1956, Bowser Jr. wrote:They’re all based on whatever your individual flavor is
So, Gamma and Marci, I think that means you are the only people from your chosen play