Mafiascum.net

In post 1976, Mutleyddmc wrote:I thought we were married.....

In post 1977, BROseidon wrote:So there were 24 pages from after I went V/LA.

And I was already behind when I went V/LA like 8 pages.

I apologize in advance for not being caught up probably until N1 or D2.

In post 1910, Saki wrote:

In post 1909, Aj The Epic wrote:How far are you in reading, Saki? And if you aren't far, why are you spamming now?

It may be a while (1-2 days) until I actually finish reading.

Spamming so you guys can read me.

In post 1971, Nachomamma8 wrote:you are town, mollie is town, syr is town, mala is town, varsoon is town, muffin is town, andrius is town, ghostlin is town, mastin is town, mac is town, venmar is town.

i don't think rach is town. rach and I have had some pretty good games together and I think her assertion that she's just bad on D1 is a lie. I've recently killed her as scum N1, I've killed her as scum before, etc. she is aware of mollie and ffery interactions and she is better than "mollie is buddying with X" because she knows your style well enough to know it as a town norm for mollie. her "yeah it's super unlikely that someone is scum in back to back games" seemed pretty fucking fishy to me considering she's never brought up gambler's fallacy ever with me even though I've been scum in a row a couple times with her before. she's been focused in telling us where we should be looking but she hasn't taken those glances herself, repeatedly calling herself an easy lynch, etc. etc. She had TWO scum reads (one of them her counterwagon) and it doesn't feel like she's trying to get any more. and in the end i suppose she's still town but i know she can do better than this.

mutley's slot is probably scum still. skull had a bunch of useless questions and a sketch fucking replace out (please don't let my play affect your opinion of my replacement) and mutley isn't even looking like a facade of his town play. he can't even give us two suspects except the easy one? his interactions with me are also awkward as fuck so there's a bonus.

i would love to have a strong read on BRO, but he's lurking and cabd's meta read is nowhere to be found even though it should really be in thread by now if he wasn't such a lazy lazy boy.

if my feelings on saki are anything close to correct, he's all but confirmed scum with that replace in.

TD scum? nick scum? lurk central. i don't want to be the one to move first in this game but nothing good is gonna come if i don't, it feels like.

In post 1978, Nachomamma8 wrote:

In post 1976, Mutleyddmc wrote:I thought we were married.....

me too, mutters.
me too.

In post 1983, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:did you figure out what else was wrong with that post yet

In post 1979, Nachomamma8 wrote:who was your strongest townread?

In post 1986, Nachomamma8 wrote:You, it seems. But I backed off so you could do your thing and show me a beautiful light of towniness instead of this too scummy to be scum which is seeming to be a trend of sorts lately.

In post 1991, Nachomamma8 wrote:Could you explain that?

In post 1992, Mutleyddmc wrote:

In post 1986, Nachomamma8 wrote:You, it seems. But I backed off so you could do your thing and show me a beautiful light of towniness instead of this too scummy to be scum which is seeming to be a trend of sorts lately.

I think you think you have meta on me rather than realising I have a mood meta to alignment meta

In post 1993, BROseidon wrote:his posts were generally shorter and more frequent.

In post 1995, Nachomamma8 wrote:funny, venny said that td has a lurkish meta

In post 1993, BROseidon wrote:

In post 1991, Nachomamma8 wrote:Could you explain that?

Basically he didn't just blatantly OMGUS and deathtunnel the person on him. His posting tone was also more aggressive and angry, and his posts were generally shorter and more frequent.

In post 1997, Nachomamma8 wrote:I see. Is there a reason why you need to be fully caught up before you can put your vote somewhere useful?