https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Everyone thought I was town except Cabd who had spoilers on Day 2 or 3, and eventually in-game Serra and FG caught on as the players alive dwindled.
This paranoia is completely faked.In post 249, Bert wrote:Innocent blah-blah - not buying it. Don't you talk to me like that. Tell that "I'M A SWEETIE PIE" to the people in 501 Stacking the Deck. Puh-leez. I don't trust you with a ten-foot pole.
THE BACKOFF WHEN GENERIC BEGINS TO BURST???
Bert town is going to reach out to me and call me scum? HELL NO. That's like, the opposite of Bert town.In post 296, Bert wrote:Nacho, love, please come reach out to Pappa.
I don't feel the love yet.
Vote: Nachomamma
In post 323, Bert wrote:EBWOP: What I'm trying to say is I've seen enough of scum using "SORRY, please get off me, lay off, etc., etc., IM OVERGAMED or I'm SOOOO stressed out, etc." to evade questions
Even Mala in my last game did that..."LAY OFF (to put it mildly) Im already going through enough with my current games and B and C and etc. etc."
You're on a short leash.
5 minutes between posts.In post 325, Bert wrote:Kay then.
My initial gut reads are still you and Mara are town and everyone else I am still working on parsing out what my feelings are. I'm gonna argue with people and annoy people and feel people out that way, help me get engaged
Have you been a meta-girl thus far in this game
This clearly was a scripted attack. Bert's scumplay involves elaborate busses with scumpartners where they attack them after they face imminent death, which is how he got his reputation for good scumplay. Certainly Shadoweh's attack wasn't an attack of what she saw as an easy target and certainty idling on her scumbuddy was a perfect place for her to bide her time.In post 419, Bert wrote:EBWOP: *calling out him/her
Either way, I'm gonna put my vote where my mouth is
VOTE: Shadoweh
Let's go, let's start arguing, Ms. Bert detractor
This is some serious hedging for a flip-flop later.In post 434, Bert wrote:no doubt in my mind you are town (last one was 514 Masons and Monks). Usually, there is a lot of hesitation for me when I'm with you, but my gut is swinging TRUST NACHO,
And this position was a subtle attack to reduce the strength of the town core...In post 435, Bert wrote:EBWOP: I have this nagging feeling in the back of my mind that one of <Tammy, Empire> may be scum. Am I just paranoid or what. Dangit.
shittalking a scumpartner, another CLASSIC bertscum move.In post 479, Bert wrote:I actually read every word of the walls in this game. Several times, believe it or not. And I digested it all. If you look at #476 before this, I am starting to doubt Tammy/Empire because paranoia is setting in. QUIZ ME ON IT.
I've spent a lot of time in this game, because I really like a few of the players in this game and I'm actually very engaged/interested.
Go ahead, test me.
You should be clear about what you're talking about then, rather than throwing around words like "you sniping little chicken hound"
How is that going to help your case any? Name-calling is pretty useless here in the way you used it.
And I'm winning, and you might be too, you know why? Because I'm getting some really passive-aggressive reactions out of you. That's what I want. I treasure these aggressive retorts with SWEETness.
BUS CITYIn post 486, Bert wrote:No, the mafia tides are not high in possibility of a lynch in his direction. Where exactly are the votes on PB? Oh right, they're mostly non-existent.In post 483, Shadoweh wrote:You're also not the first person to mention it, the mafia tides are high in possibility of a lynch in his direction.
Nacho has asked you this, and you have NOT answered. What do you think of his/her (Purple's) lying in response to Nacho's question about having played with him? And you realize there are strong players, and also players that know who Purple is but aren't telling me. That player is lurking and is coasting and we are actively LETTING that happen and permitting it.In post 483, Shadoweh wrote:Also concentrating on Purple Shoe avoiding meta questions instead of how they're avoiding the game as a whole is bad. People make alts to escape meta, don't they? It's not surprising they'd avoid answering. Bad lynch reason that tries to make everything a person's done sound super paranoid bad, like everything else you've said this game. And holy shit your reasoning for being willing to vote Gaiden.
Flail harder. That's all noise. Is that the best you can do?In post 483, Shadoweh wrote:Cut: Choke harder smartass, MY VOTE IS THE HAMMER THAT WILL PIERCE THE HEAVENS. If you really thought I was saying I would never lynch someone wallposting in the same paragraph where I explain how a wallpost could be faked by scum you must be something awful.
This is obviously not addressed to me, and is in response to Nacho's question regarding his read on me and why you're ignoring it. See, you're not being clear with your posts. Not crystal clear at all. And you wonder why you are misunderstood sometimes. *shrug* Well if you're waiting for satisfaction, I'm not going to hold up a mirror for you to see how unlikely that looks for you at this time, considering the way you are responding to me. Am I your outlet so you don't have to focus on other scumreads at this time? How's your plea for my lynch going? Oh wait, it's going nowhere. And I am totally mind-blown that your case on me isn't inspiring any votes or gathering any steam.In post 483, Shadoweh wrote:Rhetorical questions deserve rhetorical answers. I'm ignoring you because I think he's scum. My gut will not rest until it has satisfaction.
1) Your case is mostly hurling smart remarks that revolve around "you're bad/terrible" and "scum go after such "easy" targets." Tell me that's not true? Go ahead. I can go "yeah, well my gut won't rest until it has its satisfaction, so I'm gonna TOTALLY DISREGARD what everyone's telling me about another player." Like outlandish stubbornness is helpful at this point. I hope this makes you feel angry because then we get more reactions out of you. FOR THE WIN.
Totally MIND BLOWN and thrilled that you are taking the bait and really going after me. Love it, love it, love it. Keep it up!I am MIND BLOWN.
Lazy? That's subjective. More realistic. Hey, I'm always an easy lynch target. Does that make your reasoning lazy too? Watch you ignore this question and then call out Tammy again for not answering ONE of your questions.In post 483, Shadoweh wrote:Supporting a lynch on someone because they have a case on them is probably the laziest reasoning I've ever seen. I can't state enough how much I hate this Close Enough reasoning. I'm reading your expounding on this in 434 and it still comes down to Lurking + Other People.
Ha. I laugh with you and raise an eyebrow. <333 With love.
I am crying after responding to your post.
PSYCHE! I love talking at ya', trooper. GET ON YOUR KNEES and respond.
waitIn post 827, Bert wrote:What do you think of his/her blacklisting comment and all AtE spill?In post 825, Nachomamma8 wrote:pretty sure at this point. there is a tiny chance that he's playing this game specifically to make me scumread him, but mutley's not that much of an ass so that's a tinfoil worry.In post 822, Tammy wrote:Nacho are you sure about the shoe?
getting paranoid of people because they call him town...?In post 1132, Bert wrote:Nacho, Llamarble makes me feel odd because people who don't know me don't 'normally' use me as an example of someone with high scumhunting energies and as an example of someone towntelling
I'm not much of a scumhunter, and not conventional in my spamminess
Just very peculiar that he lists me, ya know?
and how many times has nacho read you wrong?In post 1990, Bert wrote:U been in 80% of my games, tons of baseline
I see what u did there, u tryin to sort me out, I ain't no fool
