Mafiascum.net

Jesus, Benmage, we saw it the first time.

You still have plenty of time in the evening to add that pirate hat to the goat, CDB.

Yarr!

In post 1969, Goat on a Raft wrote:

In post 1967, SafetyDance wrote:I wish I could ISO 13 people in 6 minutes.

1) This head started its look back with no current scumreads from the Thor wagon because, hey, we'd already have said something if anyone had already looked like somone who knew Thor would flip town.
2) Reading back, we get back to rereading #1761 (having seen a few other Thor voters around the end of the day whose positions looked fine). It prompts us to read all mentions of Thor in elle's iso.
3) We trust that our interpretations from before were still largely good, apart from this thing we didn't notice at the time (length of post an issue, this head pretty much skipped over it when first posted).

While we accept that the process 2->3 might recommend us to then re-examine

everyone

for other stuff we might have missed in order to make such a clean statement as #1964, we're just going to go ahead and run with the thing we found.

oh god you are such scum

VOTE: goat people

No, mollie. We aren't.

Look, obviously we want to give you the "strong signals" that you mention in #794. This head is sitting here, trying to figure out what it is you want us to do that would show you that. We don't want to be figuring out how to drop towntells for you because that shouldn't be the point but it is beyond irritating when you drop in after every bloody thing we say and see scum from it because you've confirmation-biased yourself six ways from Sunday over a huge impression you wanted earlier but didn't get. It is distracting and off-putting, made worse by the fact that we've got a pretty strong townread on you so we're pretty sure it's an example of mega-silliness - of which, as established on Skype, you are capable, if not outright prone - rather than a malicious attempt to get a mislynch off us.

If you want us to change our avatar for 24 hours so you can look at us slightly more freshly when you actually consider what we're doing, let us know. If you would like to tell us why we'd claim the results we claimed Today as scum, let us know (because, duh, we wouldn't).

In post 1972, Benmage wrote:I don't think scum, would need to hide in the millerscum identity... town millers take care of themselves.

The hell are you talking about? The miller didn't take care of itself, you took care of it by being either scum or a raging idiot. Keep congratulating yourself though, that looks really town.

In post 1970, Goat on a Raft wrote:

In post 1966, StupendousMan wrote:I don't like Goat's vote on elle because she definitely thought Thor was scum the whole time and her persistence was very town.

Disagree.

I don't think there's anything you're going to be able to say that will convince me of this.

The only question at this point is which of these two I should vote for.

In post 1980, Goat on a Raft wrote:Look, obviously we want to give you the "strong signals" that you mention in #794. This head is sitting here, trying to figure out what it is you want us to do that would show you that. We don't want to be figuring out how to drop towntells for you because that shouldn't be the point but it is beyond irritating when you drop in after every bloody thing we say and see scum from it because you've confirmation-biased yourself six ways from Sunday over a huge impression you wanted earlier but didn't get. It is distracting and off-putting, made worse by the fact that we've got a pretty strong townread on you so we're pretty sure it's an example of mega-silliness - of which, as established on Skype, you are capable, if not outright prone - rather than a malicious attempt to get a mislynch off us.

If you want us to change our avatar for 24 hours so you can look at us slightly more freshly when you actually consider what we're doing, let us know. If you would like to tell us why we'd claim the results we claimed Today as scum, let us know (because, duh, we wouldn't).

grrr....

that moment on skype was cos I was waiting for you to tell me what you wanted to do. I don't expect you to understand it.

UNVOTE: goat people

I am not following your elle vote, I don't see how that was her knowing thor's alignment ahead of time at all.

can you break it down for me

As promised, detail on elle tomorrow. Links, quotes, all that jazz. Just hanging around at the moment and not in the mood for more.

okay

I'm voting that scumchum because he's sitting around taking potshots at people and not actually trying to win the game

eg he's scum

if I had a gun id shoot him rn without a 2nd thought

Does anybody have a gun I can borrow to use for my own purposes or something

In post 1957, PrideandJoy wrote: I haven't read the thread past maybe the last 10 pages. So if this is flavor for 'why haven't I town read you yet' then it's because your Thor vote yesterday pained me. If it's for something role-related to you / game mechanics-y, could you please link the post(s) so I can understand what you are talking about.

I don't think it was a very good vote either, but no it's role related you idiot, why don't you try isoing me or uh, reading what people are asking me about today? Like here is what I think of you right now. This is role madness + you aren't paying attention to any role hints = You aren't trying to break the game which makes you scum.

In post 1958, elleheathen wrote: Do you only get one shot - and because you failed to choose a human you're doomed to a spinster life filled with only your Bacardi and fire?
I think I only find it weird because Tammy's search was very... open? Where I feel yours was more behind the scenes? I accept different approaches but I'm just trying to get a feel for it because there wasn't an obvious "Alfred jilted Shadoweh at the altar of fire!" mod post like Tammy/Syr's wedding post.

Can you tell me a reason I should actually answer this question? It's almost like I'm not Tammy or something. I have no interest in helping you understand. Bacardi is my best friend though, he and I can be happy forever.

In post 1960, SafetyDance wrote:Was Shadoweh drunk? I really do not fathom any of that mess.

no but basically yes

In post 1981, Cephrir wrote:

In post 1972, Benmage wrote:I don't think scum, would need to hide in the millerscum identity... town millers take care of themselves.

The hell are you talking about? The miller didn't take care of itself, you took care of it by being either scum or a raging idiot. Keep congratulating yourself though, that looks really town.

I know you meant this sarcastically Cephrir, but it really does make him look more town. I'm also pretty sure he means elle wouldn't need to go after someone for being a miller because townies like to lynch them. I don't think elle looked forced either, and picking a random person on the Thor lynch makes goat look worse, even if he has the most stylish hat I've seen.

Yarr.

Shadoweh, I see nothing about specific about your role besides the fact that you are waiting to marry someone? or want to, or w/e.

If you have some ability wherein you can neighborize / somehow form QT's etc. then picking us is a good thing if you want a QT. otherwise, we have nothing to do with you

Wow, you have absolutely no sense of fun. You must really hate your scum role pm alot if you can't even perk up a little at partying with me all night. I mean, the alternative is that you just don't care about this game and want to be set on fire for acting like mopey lurkscum. Do you want to be mopey lurkscum Dan or do you want to BE AN ACTION MAN?!

"if you could hook up with me that would be great! especially since im not reading the game so you could tell me all your special feelings" <-- by the way single white enchantress is sonly seeking good strong men, are you secretly a bear, or Reek, these are important questions you have to put on the okcupid profile

Post 1833 from Messiah is a weird and possibly bad post. "I don't like that people who hopped on the deadline wagon are on wagons of people I think are town" is what it seems like you're saying, and I don't see any possible use of that connection. Splain?

As mentioned by others, this is also a terrible post. I fail to see how using a fruitvend is anything other than a null tell.

In post 1860, StupendousMan wrote:Still cool with an ooba or quadz lynch.

How do you feel about the fact that Ooba is and has been my number 1 scumread?

I continue to not be able to read Amrun for shit.

Garruk's 1882 is quite good. The response to macmollie in particular gave me happy feelings.

Elleheathen approaching her case in 1891 from a town perspective. It's a good case, and the fact that she included his RVS vote needs to not take away from the important stuff in it.

I am fully willing to lynch benmage for Extreme Hubris.

I like Cephrir's 1914, with the exception of this bit:

In post 1914, Cephrir wrote:Just because the reasons don't come along with the vote doesn't mean they don't exist. Did you think we were voting you for fun?

if you're voting for someone, unless it's a reaction test type thing, you damn well better explain why. If you don't, it's completely fair to assume that said reasons do not, in fact, exist.

In post 1939, Tierce wrote:As for you not being "able to handle real life", you can take your RL AtE and shove it. If you're not well enough to handle this game, replace out. Voting you for your lack of presence in the game and trying to push you to contribute when you have yet to do anything worth attention is something you should be expecting at this point. You've had plenty of time and no one forces you to sign up for multiple games when you are perfectly aware that it's a time when your life gets in the way. You make this kind of lame excuse in every game and it's extremely irritating. Get your priorities and your life in order before insisting that others have to accept it in a game you signed up for out of your goddamned free will.

QFT.

I don't like 1956 from Nautilius at all. Reads like fear from scum-Nacho who wants people to believe he's town.

SD, I want to know why you voted amrun in 1960.

Alchemist, can you shed any light on the circumstances surrounding your entrance to the game?

...Alchemist is Syryana, quadz.

....... ok I'm lost

In post 1992, Tierce wrote:...Alchemist is Syryana, quadz.

Incorrect.

Just going with what I'm told.

In post 1841, Tammy wrote:

In post 1830, Messiah Complex wrote:Did Syry get replaced by Alchemist or is that mechanical?

Yes and yes :p

Day 2, Vc 6

Amrun (6) -

Zdenek, Alfred Borden, Nautilius, Shadoweh, Tammy, SafetyDance

ooba (2) -

quadz08, AGar

Cephrir (1) -

Messiah Complex

Nautilius (1) -

StupendousMan

Zdenek (1) -

elleheathen

Messiah Complex (1) -

PrideandJoy

Tierce (1) -

kanyeknowsbest

Nautilius (1) -

Amrun

elleheathen (1) -

Goat on a Raft

Not voting (9)

: Benmage, Cephrir, Garuk Relentless, ooba, displaced, SafetyDance, The Alchemist, Tierce, macmollie

With 23 alive it takes 12 votes to lynch

• Deadline Date: 17th of October at 16:05 EDT
  
• Deadline Countdown: (expired on 2013-10-17 16:05:01)
  
• Alfred Borden is V/la. I am good mod for noticing V/la announcements.
  

If there are mistakes in my votecount please let me know so I can fix them!!

This was once Syryana. No longer.

I think Syryana was a bulletproof townie who got replaced upon kill. That might just be the Sirens talking to me again, though.

@quadz: What I meant by "the reasons don't come along with the vote" was "the reasons have been given elsewhere".