Funny, Cabd never mentions paranoia in his reasons he townread her. In fact, his last use of the word paranoia was before D2- When he really was townreading her.
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:23 am
by fferyllt
In post 1971, Wisdom wrote:She is not taking stances and she is practically waiting for things to happen. Yesterday she let the day going on despite hinting that she agrees with the Cabd lynch, effectively encouraging it but she wasn't hammering. Today she is simply waiting for the quickhammer.
You're not my pick for scum #2. ffery is.
Hinting? Seriously?
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:26 am
by Wisdom
In post 1975, notscience wrote:Funny, Cabd never mentions paranoia in his reasons he townread her. In fact, his last use of the word paranoia was before D2- When he really was townreading her.
I was mostly referring to their exchange at the end of D2, where ffery kept insisting that it's warranted for her to be paranoid over him. I don't recall why Cabd was townreading her prior to that.
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:27 am
by notscience
But you said she used that as a way to make herself seem town, when that wasn't the reasoning behind Cabd's townread of her.
In post 1971, Wisdom wrote:She is not taking stances and she is practically waiting for things to happen. Yesterday she let the day going on despite hinting that she agrees with the Cabd lynch, effectively encouraging it but she wasn't hammering. Today she is simply waiting for the quickhammer.
You're not my pick for scum #2. ffery is.
Hinting? Seriously?
Are you saying it's not true? You kept leaving posts such as agreements to Cabd AtE'ing to appeal to people and even said that he does it to appeal to you.
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:30 am
by Wisdom
In post 1978, notscience wrote:But you said she used that as a way to make herself seem town, when that wasn't the reasoning behind Cabd's townread of her.
Again, I was talking about how she used Cabd and her paranoia to look like she is town that was confused by Cabd's play. I was not talking about how she appealed to Cabd.
In post 1971, Wisdom wrote:She is not taking stances and she is practically waiting for things to happen. Yesterday she let the day going on despite hinting that she agrees with the Cabd lynch, effectively encouraging it but she wasn't hammering. Today she is simply waiting for the quickhammer.
You're not my pick for scum #2. ffery is.
Hinting? Seriously?
Are you saying it's not true? You kept leaving posts such as agreements to Cabd AtE'ing to appeal to people and even said that he does it to appeal to you.
I dithered like hell over whether Cabd was scum, but I didn't hint. I dunno. I would probably have voted him within a few hours of when he self-hammered.
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:45 am
by Wisdom
Maybe "hint" is not the proper word, my point is that you encouraged his lynch without actually lynching him, which would earn you negative points.
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:49 am
by fferyllt
In post 1982, Wisdom wrote:Maybe "hint" is not the proper word, my point is that you encouraged his lynch without actually lynching him, which would earn you negative points.
This may be the most contorted FoS I've ever encountered.
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:55 am
by Wisdom
Nope, that was showing how you're lurking, both today and yesterday.
Even right now, you're trying to make people think I am scum but you're not actually voting me. And your excuses are the same as yesterday - "omg Im not sure". Yesterday it was about you wanting to think again and again about whether Cabd is scum (yet you never gave us any conclusion), and today you're all "i hate lylo" and "i cant decide" while at the same time showing clearly that its me you want lynched.
Your motive in both cases is to get the votes on the person you want lynched.
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:55 am
by fferyllt
I should count up the number of times I've had the hammer stolen from me. I should also count up the number of games where I hammered within 5 minutes of nightfall. It's an artifact of learning mafia in a plurality lynch environment, but I've been playing at MS for nearly a year and I am still pretty vote-averse.
I'll reconstruct/finish it in a while but suffice it to say that with a couple of notable exceptions
Cabd has dumped a load of discredits onto most of the players in this game.
which is accusing Cabd and encouraging his lynch. You still don't hammer though.
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:02 am
by fferyllt
In post 1984, Wisdom wrote:Nope, that was showing how you're lurking, both today and yesterday.
Even right now, you're trying to make people think I am scum but you're not actually voting me. And your excuses are the same as yesterday - "omg Im not sure". Yesterday it was about you wanting to think again and again about whether Cabd is scum (yet you never gave us any conclusion), and today you're all "i hate lylo" and "i cant decide" while at the same time showing clearly that its me you want lynched.
Your motive in both cases is to get the votes on the person you want lynched.
I'm not voting you because I want to talk with Sakura about 2nd scum. That's the main reason why I didn't vote last night, though as I think I indicated, I had reached a decision. You've convinced me that you are scum, even more than the arguments that she's put forth. Your posts reveal your motivations pretty clearly.
If I'm right (and I feel damn sure I am right), then I want her thoughts on bert and notsci before we end this day. If I'm wrong, then notsci will hammer and it's game over.
Oh really? And which posts are those exactly? What are my motivations?
To spread wifom and try to give your partner (probably notsci, but there's a chance Bert's pulling one over on me) another viable mislynch target for tomorrow.
Oh really? And which posts are those exactly? What are my motivations?
To spread wifom and try to give your partner (probably notsci, but there's a chance Bert's pulling one over on me) another viable mislynch target for tomorrow.
No, show me exactly which posts of mine have that intention and how you recognised that specific motivation over me trying to figure out who is scum.
Your refusal in 1450 and the posts after was BEFORE I had claimed anything.
I am totally not seeing your point here.
Your waiting and not hammering had nothing to do with waiting for ns to claim at the time of your posting your refusal in 1450, since I had not claimed yet.
Oh really? And which posts are those exactly? What are my motivations?
To spread wifom and try to give your partner (probably notsci, but there's a chance Bert's pulling one over on me) another viable mislynch target for tomorrow.
No, show me exactly which posts of mine have that intention and how you recognised that specific motivation over me trying to figure out who is scum.
Starting with 1968, pretty much every post you've made. I essentially affirmed in 1932 that I'll vote you today. That's the motivation for your attack. I doubt you think you'll actually get a wagon going on me today, but it's all good wifom for day 4.
I feel relieved and a lot more confident there will be a tomorrow thanks to your attack, though!
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:26 am
by Bert
I am awake now and just had lunch yay me who wants to talk about foodies
actually no, back to the game.
BOOM BOOM POWA
Speaking of motivations, Wisdom is reminding me of how advertisers try to get people in the long run to buy their shit. Well, I don't buy his shit right now. And I ain't gonna. Lalalalala
lalalalalala that's me with my ears wifom wifom wifom repeat after me lol
Ffery I'm more worried about you being scum over notscience (But it's strictly paranoia, I do think notscience is scum).
so since my mind is clear and headache hasn't approached yet what would you all like to ask me right now <3
Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:27 am
by Bert
And I was joking, I am listening to y'all btw, and Ffery seems really town today. Especially with the:
"I feel pretty damn sure i'm right" - I don't see that assertiveness from her, and it came from her and I was impressed by it's town soundingness