Mafiascum.net

She (wrongly) thought the hammer got corruption no matter what, a mistake I made too before realizing it was incorrect. I think it's a mistake more likely to come from a town perspective but eh.

In post 1964, BananaCucho wrote:We could also be living in a world where mafia has 4 players and today is LYLO

Then it would've been mylo yesterday and yesterday did not play like it was mylo. 10:3 is standard in 13 player games and with the potential for extra kills from corruption 4 players doesn't make sense. We're looking at a single scum left.

I think there's a pretty good reason redtea would be hit with corruption, actually: with norwee dead, he's the only player who can't have their corruption lowered overnight. Prevents any possibility of that person being cured of 1 point. Additionally, anyone else, with 2 corruption on them now, we could just ask them to hammer and remove them from the PoE if if they hammer town and die. This was a very savvy move.

Mmmmm perhaps

I'm going over DDs iso. Found something interesting from day 1:

In post 339, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Town: banana, nor, joey, possibly SS
Scummy: jackel, redtea, starbuck

I keep vacillating on where to put androgybee

Everyone else: I don't know

This is very interesting by DD from day one

Rat/Bell and Porkens are in the "not sure where to put them" group. Where a non-bussing scum would want them to be.

Day 1 they throw a lot of votes around between Starbuck, Jackel, and Math

Day 2 they jump on Porkens early after Bell requests it. But keep reiterating that they wanna actually vote starbuck or Jackel

In post 803, Dumb and Dumber wrote:For now, OK

But I would like to strongly reiterate that I believe starbuck and jackel to be scummy

VOTE: porkens

- Dumber

In post 954, Dumb and Dumber wrote:I'm pretty happy with this porkens vote, but I'd also switch to starbuck if that ever became a thing

- Dumber

Now. Here comes the interesting part

In post 993, Dumb and Dumber wrote:I have a hunch that scum have higher corruption thresholds for dying. Should we all mass claim these thresholds?
We're at 3-7 right now anyway, right? Pre-LyLo. Hm, maybe we should fully mass then?

-Dumbass

This was August 4th. The day started August 3rd. The vc was as follows:

Porkens (4): Bell, DD, Norwee, catboi
Jackel (1): Redtea
Norwee (2): Jackel, Porkens
Starbuck (1): Banana

So the question here is: which is more likely? Scum DD pushing for a mass claim to take heat off of Porkens with a week to go til day end? Or town DD realizing at 7-3 we can't afford to mislunch here and a mass claim helps us solve it?

If DD is scum, they and Bell can flip that vote elsewhere. I don't think the call to mass claim was scum motivated tbh. And I thought maybe scum might be looking for 3p before, but imo scum always strongly believed no 3p existed.

I think if anything strongly points to DD being town its this action

I think scum DD lets the day play out imo. If DD+Bell is a team they have a cakewalk to the end even if Porkens goes down

In post 1960, redtea wrote:Didnt get to say: I didn't say it was

likely

lol.

I got one corruption!
And fucking Norwee is dead??
...interesting choice

Ours didn't change

I still think star is scum

VOTE: star

- Dumber

In post 1964, BananaCucho wrote:We could also be living in a world where mafia has 4 players and today is LYLO

I think this is remarkably unlikely

In post 1966, BananaCucho wrote:I want to review DD today. They were on the Porkens train at the end but basically pushed Starbuck relentlessly over Porkens for as long as I remember

Cuz star is still scummy

DD what's your drink (both of you)

We pivoted to Porkens, no? I personally wouldn't let him fakeclaim "Beastmaster"

-Dumbass

In post 1979, BananaCucho wrote:Or town DD realizing at 7-3 we can't afford to mislunch here and a mass claim helps us solve it?

It's convention to mass claim at pre-LyLo!

I think we should just eliminate Starbuck today?

-Dumbass

I mean I can see a world where Porkens white knights one of Jackel/Starbuck, sure, and hard defends the other as a scum mate

Or they tried to white knight/pocket both, idk. Why Starbuck over Jackel in particular?

banana, on your case of D&D's voting and mass-claim push

In post 979, Dumb and Dumber wrote:

In post 975, BananaCucho wrote:Should I use one of my powers?

Yes! I'm pretty sure you'd be targeted for the NK.

-Dumbass

See, this together with the mass-claim push is super fuckin sus.

At 2 corruption you're more likely to be given corruption and killed than be NK'd. Following that up with asking for a mass-claim? Definitely sounds like looking to set up another 2 for 1 by uncovering the best claimed role to kill.

Both D&D and Bell were in favor of mass claim. Porkens was "not fully opposed" to mass claim. D&D did very well framing it as "for the good of town".


D&D's voting record D2 unimpressive at best and coordinated and maf-y at worst. And I'm inclined to say the latter. I just don't see what you're seeing banana.

Then there's this:

In post 1036, Dumb and Dumber wrote:If receiving fruit also means that the receiver gets a corruption point, the fruit vendor sounds like a scum role to me
At the very least, it's neg-utility, and should have been claimed, and ought not to have been used on Banana

I'm going to go here
VOTE: Starbuck

- Dumber

Town points:
Points out that a negative-utility sounds maf.
Maf points:
Doesn't follow up on it when Bell claims. Falls in line with banana's "actually I asked to be given fruit so they're probably town & chill", never seems to question it.
Does the same "hah I was right" as Porkens while, again, having never pushed Bell on it.

Anyway, D&D's a maf-lean for me.
I'll look at some others after I've rested my eyes a bit. But he definitely feels like he's been coasting on goodwill this whole time. A less-active Bell if you will.

Hey I've been wrong before

Obviously a massclaim helps scum, but it also helps town (and more), and more when you're in pre-Lylo. This is not some cunning trick I was trying to manipulate town into falling for, it's established that mass-claims on the day before LyLo are good.

At 2 corruption you're more likely to be given corruption and killed than be NK'd.

And when I said this, IIRC I didn't know that his using a power would lead to more corruption. I explicitly said a few posts after that not to use his power if he would die as a result.

Whose voting record is impressive? Most were townreading Bell. We were on Porkens a lot. If Starbuck's scum, our voting record for D2 would be stellar

-Dumbass

In post 1987, BananaCucho wrote:Why Starbuck over Jackel in particular?

Jackel leaves no impression on me, whereas Starbuck leaves a scummy one.

-Dumbass

Busy weekend. Catching up tonight.

I miss Norwee </3

Alright friends, I'm here, hi.

In post 1956, BananaCucho wrote:Also with just 1 death Norwee might have been right about us not having a 3p. Cause Bell and Porkens could have both targeted SS night 1

I was thinking this, too.

In post 1957, catboi wrote:Yes, I re-thought the death after the flip - likely explanation is S_S got 1 corruption from using his ability, targeted porkens, and got 1 corruption from somewhere else. Just really bad luck there.

Didn't Bell's flip say something about multiple fruit? That would make a lot more sense than 3P. I should have thought of that before now.

In post 1965, BananaCucho wrote:If anyone else got corruption please claim it thanks

1 for not being on the wagon.

In post 1966, BananaCucho wrote:I want to review DD today.

Likewise. I was hoping that Jackal would do a good break down there because she seemed to not be so lost on that slot.

Oh look, more IIOA

- Dumber

In post 1970, BananaCucho wrote:Starbuck is scum, and is banking on 3P talk today getting me eliminated and so they went for the cleric CC hoping to kill them slowly

No, I just went back to read Bell's role and I think a fruit killed S_S.

In post 1974, redtea wrote:Another thing weird to me is how Starbuck didn't negotiate with us to avoid acquiring unnecessary corruption. Inherently, that hurts town, for reasons you described banana.

I was also in the middle of my workday when that happened on Wednesday midday. TMI, but my coworker was being let go because nonprofit budget cuts, I had an emergency meeting with my Executive Director, and it was just chaos work wise while trying to check in to the game after 12 pm. The last few votes, while not needing to be, were rushed right through.

I totally agree that it hurts town, but I think those rushing it through hurt town more. We weren't up against the deadline, there were like 2 days.

In post 1975, catboi wrote:She (wrongly) thought the hammer got corruption no matter what, a mistake I made too before realizing it was incorrect. I think it's a mistake more likely to come from a town perspective but eh.

Yes. When I realized that it didn't, I came back to hammer and you beat me by 5 minutes or something with an excuse of "not knowing when I was returning," which was blatantly unfair given that I had been available (finally).

In post 1996, Dumb and Dumber wrote:Oh look, more IIOA

- Dumber

Oh look, more and more discrediting.

Look, it would be helpful to know who you think is scum today, who your townreads are, and how you think we should be solving the game

Literally nothing you've posted tonight is helpful to any of that

If someone is townreading star can you explain why?

Banana? Cat? jackel? red?

Like why is this town ^

- Dumber