Mafiascum.net

In post 1970, Three wrote:If RH9/Q are both town, then are scum on these wagons or literally just not playing the game?

In post 1974, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=13196542#p13196542]post 1955[/url], Milk & Mocha wrote:

the thing right behind your hat

Spoiler:

It's part of her puppet, Claomh Solais

In post 1976, Firebringer wrote:Did anyone say Q was town here

In post 1979, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:I'm nowhere near engaged enough to be able to answer that

In post 1936, numberQ wrote:

In post 1790, RH9 wrote:

In post 1777, Harley Quinn wrote:

In post 1770, Three wrote:

@RH9:

Why aren't you voting Q?

+1

Yes, I guess that’s concerning me too. He says Q’s playing differently here but he’s not voting him or anyone, so it makes me wonder.

Because I don't go around voting people for acting 'different'.

I recall you being very interested in meta in previous games. What is that if not voting people for acting different?

In post 1936, numberQ wrote:

In post 1691, RH9 wrote:numberQ, why do you hate M&M's 1648?

Just the arrogance really.

In post 1790, RH9 wrote:

In post 1777, Harley Quinn wrote:

In post 1770, Three wrote:

@RH9:

Why aren't you voting Q?

+1

Yes, I guess that’s concerning me too. He says Q’s playing differently here but he’s not voting him or anyone, so it makes me wonder.

Because I don't go around voting people for acting 'different'.

I recall you being very interested in meta in previous games. What is that if not voting people for acting different?

In post 1820, Firebringer wrote:i think megazumarill is town.
And RH9 why dont we push numberq towards elim here if that will get the best read

Yeah honestly more votes on me might make me effort more.

In post 1875, RH9 wrote:numberQ, what do you think of the current gamestate?

I think I'm partially responsible for it being so dead as one of the people who pretty much stopped posting the last few days. That's my b.

In post 1892, RH9 wrote:

In post 1890, Enchant wrote:Is there's someone else lurking expect for me? I didn't notice really.

I don't think so.

What a weird exchange, though it's coming from two players who historically I've incorrectly SRed for having weird exchanges.

In post 1894, Enchant wrote:Suddenly idea to force no-lim and wait before mafia blast Jester is not horrible for me.
Do you think Jester hiding about active or passive players? And who mafia will start shoting... Hmm.

I think giving the mafia free kills is a bad idea tbh. What makes you think the mafia will kill the jester?

In post 1898, Firebringer wrote:Enchant is the jester. Change my mind

Idk how to change your mind if you haven't said anything that's in your mind. Why is he jester? Actually, better question, why do you think it's a good idea to out the jester?

In post 1907, Firebringer wrote:good question, right now im voting numberq i believe, that one has a 30-40% chance of being scum. If i had a better odds would be voting there but this is the kind of casino gambling we got to work with when i don't read full game.

RH9 has at LEAST those odds and he's closer to being limmed, vote him.

In post 1925, Firebringer wrote:

In post 1921, Three wrote:Not sure what this means but the RH9 push is based on vibes + game state + the weird hedging around Q.

Basically im saying is u have nothing. You insist on RH9 to interact with ur read because :
A) you got nothing so ur looking for a reaction to give u a genuine read
B) ur looking for something to give u ammo to justify ur push (again fake but this is more nefarious)

But since im accusing u of having a fake read here and u gave reasons.
What is RH9 supposed to answer that will help u read him any better with a post about either his vibe or gamestate....

the only thing he can answer for is hedging around Q. Which looks to me like ur possibly chainsaw or defending townie. Idk. Kind of weird.

I changed my mind, enchant isn't jester. Three is jester trying to poke at people to get them to reflexively vote em. I figured it out mom, where my prize.

Wait so now it's SCUMMY to ask people to engage with your reads??? That is seriously the wildest take I've ever heard in a game of mafia

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=13196577#p13196577]post 1981[/url], Milk & Mocha wrote:

In post 1979, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:I'm nowhere near engaged enough to be able to answer that

what if I told you we could win the game right now

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=13196585#p13196585]post 1984[/url], Milk & Mocha wrote:did you really read that entire wall

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=13196592#p13196592]post 1988[/url], Milk & Mocha wrote:I heard the Mafia has a Godfather who if we eliminate him, we win the game immediately

In post 1991, Firebringer wrote:Listen i don't read but even i read the third post about setup

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=13172113#p13172113]post 56[/url], Milk & Mocha wrote:ftr pooky is my mentor and im learning the ways of trolling people until their eyeballs fall out hehe

-nornorbearbear