Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2022 10:52 am
@ mod, talking of bbt, he needs a prod.
Welcome to every game ever with me if that’s your conclusion.In post 1958, NorwegianboyEE wrote:So far in this game, you've basically said nothing. Or said stuff that sounds like it's saying something, but on closer inspection it's just as meaningless.In post 366, PenguinPower wrote:absolutely nowhere except gamma seems too stiff, but that's probably town indicative.In post 342, Somnus wrote:And Penguin, besides noting that Not_Mafia is playing a very different style than I think we were all expecting, where are you at with regards to some of the other players in the game?
In post 1953, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If there was late scum in Jake wagon it's probably Penguinpower.
In post 1372, Jake The Wolfie wrote:VOTE: Enchant
Hello, Enchant! Welcome to Mafia, would you like to come play instead of acting rather foolish? You don't seem to be quite a talker, so I am taking this opportunity to light your feet on fire.
In post 1375, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Hey Jake, why Enchant and why not BB or the hydra?
In post 1376, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Enchant is right here with (at least) 3 votes including mine, wheras other candidates do not have much momentum. Also, Enchant is flailing about and I want to know why.
In post 1442, Jake The Wolfie wrote:On the whole I'm feeling better about Nancy and Friends. I'll still advocate for pushing Enchant up, though.
In post 1534, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Unfortunately that’s not ai for him. His play here is definitely antitown but he does this shit as either alignment.In post 1532, Jake The Wolfie wrote:In post 1200, Jake The Wolfie wrote:The chatter on Enchan't role seemed to be useless, but apparently it showed that they actually were claiming to be a cop??In post 1518, Enchant wrote:2. I fakeclaimed. You all probably *GASP* now.
I'll count that as calling it.
In post 1535, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Do you think that Enchant would be a good axe today?In post 1534, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Unfortunately that’s not ai for him. His play here is definitely antitown but he does this shit as either alignment.In post 1532, Jake The Wolfie wrote:In post 1200, Jake The Wolfie wrote:The chatter on Enchan't role seemed to be useless, but apparently it showed that they actually were claiming to be a cop??In post 1518, Enchant wrote:2. I fakeclaimed. You all probably *GASP* now.
I'll count that as calling it.
In post 1536, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Based on his play so far, it wouldn’t exactly be a tragedy but as I said, the “99% I’m wrong” makes me think he could be town.In post 1535, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Do you think that Enchant would be a good axe today?In post 1534, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Unfortunately that’s not ai for him. His play here is definitely antitown but he does this shit as either alignment.In post 1532, Jake The Wolfie wrote:In post 1200, Jake The Wolfie wrote:The chatter on Enchan't role seemed to be useless, but apparently it showed that they actually were claiming to be a cop??In post 1518, Enchant wrote:2. I fakeclaimed. You all probably *GASP* now.
I'll count that as calling it.
In post 1584, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I have, but I could not find anything that explained it. Could you either show me where it is?In post 1582, Enchant wrote:Oh goddamn just open my iso.In post 1579, Jake The Wolfie wrote:@Enchant I still would like this answered.In post 1575, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Where did you explain this?In post 1574, Enchant wrote:Explained why killing Goldfish is bad idea, therefore cutting POE to 8 people.
You?
In post 1585, Enchant wrote:Aw shit. Here we go again.
Look, likelyhood of Somnus being town is already high.
No one scumread Goldfish for real, and only idea is "Let's kill Goldfish because null, if we are wrong, we get conftown anyway and can protect him!". Conftowning person who is already town is kiiiiiiiiiiiiiinda dumb, especially because with idea "Why not, we can protect him!".
It's just not worth it mechanically, unless there's like 80%+ chance of goldfish being mafia, and i am pretty confident that Goldfish is Town than not, but that's me (i can't provide reasonable explainings).
Even if Goldfish is mafia (which can be possible, like anything possible), it may be even benefiting to ignore him for a moment, where we are unsure. I strongly believe that he turns obvious lategame, and this way Somnus will be alive as well, which easies game a bit.
In unpredicted case, where Somnus and Goldfish both mafs (Which i am 99% sure NOT a case, but still), i still belive it's worth to watch them, not risk likelytowns just for sake of risk.
In post 1587, Jake The Wolfie wrote:There we go, now it's in your ISO.In post 1585, Enchant wrote:Aw shit. Here we go again.
Look, likelyhood of Somnus being town is already high.
No one scumread Goldfish for real, and only idea is "Let's kill Goldfish because null, if we are wrong, we get conftown anyway and can protect him!". Conftowning person who is already town is kiiiiiiiiiiiiiinda dumb, especially because with idea "Why not, we can protect him!".
It's just not worth it mechanically, unless there's like 80%+ chance of goldfish being mafia, and i am pretty confident that Goldfish is Town than not, but that's me (i can't provide reasonable explainings).
Even if Goldfish is mafia (which can be possible, like anything possible), it may be even benefiting to ignore him for a moment, where we are unsure. I strongly believe that he turns obvious lategame, and this way Somnus will be alive as well, which easies game a bit.
In unpredicted case, where Somnus and Goldfish both mafs (Which i am 99% sure NOT a case, but still), i still belive it's worth to watch them, not risk likelytowns just for sake of risk.
Although, I don't think that most people were seriously pushing for Goldfish to be axed anyway, because they are currently absent. This was a rather easy thing to argue for is what I'm saying.
What else is on your resumè?
In post 1588, Enchant wrote:You forgot to answer mine.
In post 1589, Jake The Wolfie wrote:We are currently playing Questions and Answers, wherin I ask you a series of related questions, to not lose the focus, and you provide satisfactory answers. Once I'm satisfied, it can be your turn.
In post 1590, Enchant wrote:Too bad. I am above rules.
In post 1591, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If you would like to play footsies, play it with someone else. If you want your questions answered, please answer mine first.
What else have you done to contribute?
In post 1592, Enchant wrote:You are not in right to answer me questions like these, nor they gonna help.
I don't care, how much or how less you contributed (this question i ask you is actually irony), nor you should care how much i did, you need to think if i am town or not and ask questions about ppl. I can as well look whole game, say "oh yes, it's scummy and this is not", make readlist, many things. They are easily fakeble. Ironically, in every game where i was maf, i could just made readlist and turn townread for everyone, just because. Idk why, i never understand this, probably people just like these things.
Your work also meaningless, because if you are town, then you wasted all time to push me, another town. So while you of course wasted more time on this, you achieved same thing as me. Nothing. Maybe even negative. So ironically, i have more BPP (Benefit Per Post), wasting less effort and achieved same results.
Science. You can think about purpose of life of something, i am busy.
In post 1593, Jake The Wolfie wrote:In post 1591, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If you would like to play footsies, play it with someone else. If you want your questions answered, please answer mine first.
What else have you done to contribute?
In post 1595, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Good, I'm satisfied, now it's your turn to ask questions if you so desire.
In post 1596, Enchant wrote:What your scumread on me even based off
Probably not something Jake's partner points out? Like, I don't think this was necessarily some huge "Gotcha!" moment, but I dunno that his partner points this out.In post 1201, PenguinPower wrote:In post 1054, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Haven't read much past page 10, all I can conclude is that my slot had many opinions and not facts.In post 1200, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I have just finished Page 6-
I don't necessarily disagree. I don't think he's mafia but I think he's been largely unhelpful.In post 1983, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m not letting Enchant go until he starts seeing sense
I don’t really scumread him that strongly anymore but he is not playing anywhere close to rationally
I'm not buying that switch back. That could easily be interpreted as trying to buy credit, because realizing that Jake was eventually going to be eliminated he didn't want to look suspicious with the unvote. Personally thinking.In post 1982, Somnus wrote:Probably not something Jake's partner points out? Like, I don't think this was necessarily some huge "Gotcha!" moment, but I dunno that his partner points this out.In post 1201, PenguinPower wrote:In post 1054, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Haven't read much past page 10, all I can conclude is that my slot had many opinions and not facts.In post 1200, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I have just finished Page 6-
To me, scum!Penguin/Enchant only makes sense if the plan as soon as Jake replaced in was, "Ok, we're bussing the ever-loving shit out of you immediately." I don't like the timing of Penguin's unvote of Jake late in Day 2, but he did switch back to Jake to put him at E-1 when we were somehow nearing the deadline. Thoughts, I guess?
Also Enchant: Two right guesses in a row.Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m not letting Enchant go until he starts seeing sense
I don’t really scumread him that strongly anymore but he is not playing anywhere close to rationally
In post 1985, Kop wrote:I'm not buying that switch back. That could easily be interpreted as trying to buy credit, because realizing that Jake was eventually going to be eliminated he didn't want to look suspicious with the unvote. Personally thinking.In post 1982, Somnus wrote:Probably not something Jake's partner points out? Like, I don't think this was necessarily some huge "Gotcha!" moment, but I dunno that his partner points this out.In post 1201, PenguinPower wrote:In post 1054, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Haven't read much past page 10, all I can conclude is that my slot had many opinions and not facts.In post 1200, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I have just finished Page 6-
To me, scum!Penguin/Enchant only makes sense if the plan as soon as Jake replaced in was, "Ok, we're bussing the ever-loving shit out of you immediately." I don't like the timing of Penguin's unvote of Jake late in Day 2, but he did switch back to Jake to put him at E-1 when we were somehow nearing the deadline. Thoughts, I guess?
Why is this what you focus on of everything on your returnIn post 1986, Kop wrote:I see that Penguin was fairly on at Jake throughout half a dozen posts that I read, but that doesn't rule out that there was a bus, and the whole change to Enchant before switching back to Jake doesn't feel right in my mind, it felt like he switched to Enchant hoping that it would take off, then as deadline got closer decided to switch back to Jake possibly knowing that he would flip scum, therefore it feels like he would gain some town cred for doing so (hiding behind I could have coasted to a no elim excuse if I was scum).
It doesn't feel right, but once I'm over my tiredness I will read into it all a lot more.
Why?In post 1992, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:doubt Penguin is scum after Jake flip.
I don’t really agree with the rationale behind Somnus’s posts because it is way too surface level thinking to assume that just because Penguin posted shade on Jake during their catch-up that they could not be scum partners.In post 1995, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:1982 from Somnus