Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2022 4:46 pm
Mastina, can you elaborate on your Uncrowned and Andres reads? I feel like you keep skipping right over them
In post 1686, mastina wrote:This is accurate; Lukewarm is missing the "A-HA!!!" factor.In post 1650, Vivax wrote:Like...You consider a lot of things at once in parallel, but don‘t really point and shoot. I hope this doesn‘t come across as mischaracterizing, but it‘s what keeps me sus on you.
Making the cases he has is not an a-ha! factor; making the cases he has is having predetermined the outcome and writing the evidence to fit that narrative.
In post 1762, mastina wrote:Because Luke is thorough and meticulous as town and absolutely methodical. His towngame is well-thought-out and doesn't make the ""mistakes"" in narrative he has made this game.In post 1758, fireisredsir wrote:but what about that do you think is specific to luke being scum?
Subject: Mini 2254 | Subreddit uPick | Finmastina wrote:In post 499, The Bombay wrote:I was in a "monkery" with Mastina, and she did not claim to be a mason (or a monk for that matter). To be fair, it makes more sense to not claim it when you are actually in one.
This is a pointless observation. If she fake claims it enough for you to say this, it is moot. I just found it interesting in an NAI kind of way.
~LukeHURT: The Bombay
To be clear, this is a scumclaim in of itself from Luke. Both in portrayal of that game and in content from Luke. I don't believe this is a town-Lukewarm
Just coming in, saying that my methodology is too perfect as town, and not perfect in this game, therefore I am scum. Also, some amorphous difference on top of that. Both points designed to be un-interactable.mastina wrote:Because it's an incredibly un-Luketown analysis to make, basically.In post 533, skitter30 wrote:*why* is that a scumclaim from luke? Why is this not something town-luke would think?
Yeah. Off the top of my head FGO 2 and NQN 1 (she was scum in NQN 2, but town in NQN 1), but pretty sure more then that that I am just not thinking of.In post 1979, Dannflor wrote:Do you have experience with her town meta too?
I will go back and look at those town games I guessIn post 1978, Dannflor wrote:I see your points - I think unfortunately the rather stubborn push on you isn't immediately alignment indicative. I think Mastina tends to dig in her heels early and often as either alignment, and it only becomes apparent over time how genuine her stubbornness is.
Definitely not a slot that I'm just not going to reevaluate until D4 or whatever
This game has a 5 headed hydra, that is not playing on a hydra account. Just all 5 people on, and posting. They were listed in the vote counts as just... the 5 names as a list, with just 1 vote. Quite possibly the worst thing I have seen.In post 1742, Ausuka wrote:I went back to find this game just for you! I hope I get town points for this.
viewtopic.php?f=54&t=79906
In this game mastina decides in, like, RVS? Basically the start of the game, she decides her order of suspects is exactly Pine -> Lavender -> Ausuka -> ofrhz.
(Basically, I know it's been a while since I've seen Dannflor play as a replacement, but this doesn't look like his town-replacement approach. The formatting, the subjects he's engaged in, his focus, where he is looking, how he is engaging, etc. All of it lacks the Dannflor replacement flair I expect from him.In post 1988, mastina wrote:Okay I have a new hot take:
One, but not both, of {Lukewarm, Dannflor} are scum.
They arenotscumbuddies, but they arenotboth town.
This.In post 1867, Klick wrote:I think the scumteam is trying to feel out if they can get mastina eliminated today because they feel trapped by her influence and accurate perception of the game
This doesn’t make sense and you should be reevaluating more if you simultaneously see us both as scum interacting with town and as not alignedIn post 1988, mastina wrote:Okay I have a new hot take:
One, but not both, of {Lukewarm, Dannflor} are scum.
They arenotscumbuddies, but they arenotboth town.
Their interactions already have me sure that they're not partnered together but both look like scum interacting with town, if that makes sense. One of them is town being interacted with by scum; the other is scum interacting with town.
Yeah the "zone-out" effect is real. It's ridiculously easy to get overstimulated and just...not "be there", as it were.In post 1880, Vivax wrote:It's a trait that backfires easily. Is why I mostly prefer to be on my own with nothing but my thoughts. And often look like I'm daydreaming around others.
I'll probably be able to sell you on fire-scum tomorrow with relative ease, but it's not worth tackling today.In post 1878, Klick wrote:definitely not seeing fire-scum
Then who would you propose as scum?In post 1887, jjh927 wrote:I think Mastina, Lukewarm, Titus, and Roden are all town
You are town.In post 1865, mastina wrote:LOCKTOWN:
{Vivax, jjh927, Something_Smart, PenguinPower}
{Andresvmb, furtiveglance}
{Ydrasse, Uncrowned, Ausuka, Titus}
TOWN:
{Klick}
??? (tbh):
{Malakittens}
POE POSSIBLE SCUM:
{RCEnigma}
LIKELY SCUM:
{fireisredsir}
SCUM:
{Lukewarm}
{Roden}
I'm comfortable moving Titus up to locktown at this point to be honest. There's just too much she has going for her. Departure from her established patterns as scum; content posted; consistent counterwagon to scum; pushers of her elimination largely being suspect; play more clearly being town; etc.
Any individual thing wouldn't be enough, but collectively as a whole I'm comfortable with that locktown read right now.
My metric is working just fine.In post 1891, Lukewarm wrote:I don't find her coming up with a reason to push me town indicative, and also your bar for "so fluently" is broken lolIn post 1862, mastina wrote:For the record: anyone with any semblance of doubt that Titus is town need look no further than drunk-Titus's post here.In post 1848, Titus wrote:Oh were you planning on faking vig and Vivak true claimed first
The tinfoil theory that Lukewarm is scum who planned to fakeclaim vig before Vivax realclaimed it is one that I don't think Titus could come up with if she were scum--and even if shecould, certainly not whiledrunkcould she explain/out this theory so fluently.