Mafiascum.net

I am voyeur

If three invests claim to visit person x and I voyeur target X, I get told 3 invests visit target X

If scum use a rolestopper all three invests know there is a scum roleblocker

If I get two or less then we know either A) there is a scum roleblocker or B) person lied.

If we get exact amount then that’s tantamount to a cop on that person because they will have been followed/tracked/voyeured/who knows what else

Rolestopper*

if anyone else wants to do it thats fine but i wont

that's a lot of claims

In post 1973, MathBlade wrote:I am voyeur

If three invests claim to visit person x and I voyeur target X, I get told 3 invests visit target X

If scum use a rolestopper all three invests know there is a scum roleblocker

If I get two or less then we know either A) there is a scum roleblocker or B) person lied.

If we get exact amount then that’s tantamount to a cop on that person because they will have been followed/tracked/voyeured/who knows what else

I see some merit, but it can and probably will backfire.

In post 1977, Enchant wrote:

In post 1973, MathBlade wrote:I am voyeur

If three invests claim to visit person x and I voyeur target X, I get told 3 invests visit target X

If scum use a rolestopper all three invests know there is a scum roleblocker

If I get two or less then we know either A) there is a scum roleblocker or B) person lied.

If we get exact amount then that’s tantamount to a cop on that person because they will have been followed/tracked/voyeured/who knows what else

I see some merit, but it can and probably will backfire.

How?

If scum try to mess with it then we know they do or what powers they have.
If they don’t then we learn exactly about a player those invests.

We get the same thing by playing.

Please comment on my reads.

In post 1979, Titus wrote:We get the same thing by playing.

Please comment on my reads.

Already commented numerous times.

I disagree with your reads and you keep deflecting any questions I ask.

In post 1979, Titus wrote:We get the same thing by playing.

Please comment on my reads.

And no we literally don’t.

What do you feel has been deflected? Do you really think all my scumreads are town?

In post 1982, Titus wrote:What do you feel has been deflected? Do you really think all my scumreads are town?

Why YOU think BGC is town.

I don’t want to hear because “Frogger said so” Frogger is not claiming invest with an inno. What you have described is why you don’t want to vote BGC not why you think BGC is town.

And because you won’t actively answer why the fuck a BGC wagon won’t take off and why you TR him yes. I think your reads have to be fundamentally off

Hell even Frogger is willing to vote BGC so that’s not even valid anymore

A lot of what you have proposed I went over with Frogger last night

That's not discussing my reads. Frankly, I see StD as scum in the VCA. He was an active poster before this. StD's reaction to the claims to say "That's a lot of claims" and dip.

I am sick of going around on BcG. Let's talk about other slots.

*He was an active poster =BcG bad grammar

I sure did I'm at work

That's not grasping at low hanging fruit, thats poking the rotten pears off the ground

malcolm scum

In post 1986, Titus wrote:That's not discussing my reads. Frankly, I see StD as scum in the VCA. He was an active poster before this. StD's reaction to the claims to say "That's a lot of claims" and dip.

I am sick of going around on BcG. Let's talk about other slots.

You won’t discuss mine I won’t discuss yours. That is if they’re true which they aren’t imho.

The more you resist the more scum you seem to me

You as town love cracking games

afteer my.last game.i guess i don't have that same drive after falling flat for getting pushed.
kinda out of this game so imma claim im.loyal bg, if theres a vig this can combo nicely.
I can create a clear potentially and yeah.

I'd like to get STD and i can BG pooky tonight

In post 414, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:signed, Big Gaming chungus

crumb here btw

I don’t believe it but the smart thing is to respect it and I will voyeur Pooky to verify my theory.

VOTE: Titus

Can’t get one scum Titus is as good as any other

In post 1993, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:

In post 414, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:signed, Big Gaming chungus

crumb here btw

Okay now it might have some merit

Which means what the hell were scum doing?

Tbh my vote on Titus is on protest since she won’t fucking work with the majority of town

It will probably move after work.

I am sick and tired of her saying no to everything without any explanation.

In post 1753, Titus wrote:I'm stopped for gas.

Math needs to be shut up about his nonsense of me being scum because I disagree. If you're certain it will go ahead.

Well okay no duh you disagree there.

Y'all started talking a lot

Cool I Will catch everyone soon