Mafiascum.net

Oh yes, just to be clear. Slandaar is now at L-1 after those last two votes.

you are using WIFOM by saying "why wouldnt i scapegoat elmo as that is a better choice" pretty much, and it seems like you were trying to flip the "stating the obvious" thing back onto me aka to me looks like looking for a scapegoat.

↑ DCLXVI wrote:Oh yes, just to be clear. Slandaar is now at L-1 after those last two votes.

why are you toying with my gut? Now i think you are stating the obvious again, but i prefer my slandaar vote because of recent events, but you are stating the obvious...
thanks for that, for now keeping my vote, but now i am unsure again.

↑ Thomith wrote:

↑ DCLXVI wrote:Oh yes, just to be clear. Slandaar is now at L-1 after those last two votes.

why are you toying with my gut? Now i think you are stating the obvious again, but i prefer my slandaar vote because of recent events, but you are stating the obvious...
thanks for that, for now keeping my vote, but now i am unsure again.

(sorry for tripple post)
by stating the obvious you are outing a L-1 maybe to gain towncred which is my point for that post.

↑ DCLXVI wrote:

Both quotes say that your argument against me is unreasonable.

↑ DCLXVI wrote:

I would agree with slandaar that what he is doing makes me and om look like a scum pair

, which I find annoying because that isn't the case.

↑ Thomith wrote:you are using WIFOM by saying "why wouldnt i scapegoat elmo as that is a better choice" pretty much, and it seems like you were trying to flip the "stating the obvious" thing back onto me aka to me looks like looking for a scapegoat.

True, I will grant that that is WIFOM. I was trying to make a point by saying that if I had wanted to use a scapegoat, why not choose Elmo?

I'm not sure how you derive that I was "looking for a scapegoat" by flipping "stating the obvious" back on you. Heck, I'm not even sure what you mean when you use the term "scapegoat", so could you clarify, please?

Preview Edit: Thomith, you're trying way too hard to stick this to DCL. This warning didn't feel like his other warning at all, and in fact it was useful, since I wasn't aware that Slandaar went to L-1 with my vote.

If you want to nail DCL, please come up with something better. Your material is not convincing in my eyes, at least.

PE2: Slandaar, that's terrible.

My post 198 is correct but I believe I could be more clear.

Here are my two quotes in full, which slandaar says are in conflict.

↑ DCLXVI wrote:KS- He comes off to me as misguided town as opposed to scum. His case against me was wrong, but not unreasonable as opposed to what slandaar is doing.

Ok, I'm saying that KS is not unreasonable when he is compared to Slandaar. Which means I think slandaar is being unreasonable.

Second full quote.

The second quote is me saying that Slandaar's arguments against me are more unreasonable than what KS is doing.

Ok, in this statement which is adressed at Slandaar I call his arguments more unreasonable that what KS is doing.

Ok now to compare the two:

KS is not as unreasonable as Slandaar.
Slandaar arguments are more unreasonable than KS's

The second statement is the inverse of the first.

Both mean exactly the same thing, there is no conflict.

Will respond to Slandaar last post in just a second

↑ Slandaar wrote:

↑ DCLXVI wrote:

Both quotes say that your argument against me is unreasonable.

↑ DCLXVI wrote:

I would agree with slandaar that what he is doing makes me and om look like a scum pair

, which I find annoying because that isn't the case.

Ah, I see what you are doing Slandaar, you are taking 189 out of context again.
Let me give the full quote sigh....

↑ DCLXVI wrote:Om I am suspicious of him a little, but not if Slandaar is scum. Honestly, while I don't mind people defending me, I would agree with slandaar that what

he

is doing makes me and om look like a scum pair, which I find annoying because that isn't the case.

From the full context the that is underlined refers to om NOT to slandaar.

Slandaar is trying to make it look like I am admitting that Slandaar argument makes me look like scum, when in fact I am simply saying that Om's odd defense of me could be contrued to make me look like scum. I am in no way agreeing that Slandaars argument against me is good.

what im saying is that i think you are trying to flip a mislynch onto me, which if i use wifom could mean you have 2 mislynches set up, but that is all wifom, so the scapegoat thing is not a strong arguement.
Also i know it is not the best thing, but i am not trying to make a case on DC at this point, as i have already explained everything i need to at this point, and sometimes scum say pro-town things that isnt scumhunting or that they cant slip up on to gain town points.

Edit for post 207

Construed, not contrued.

...just because I FoS you doesn't mean I'm trying to get you lynched.

FOS means you suspect someone, and you want your suspects lynched, so you kind of are in a sense, i see what you are saying though.

No DCL its pretty simple

you claim im being unreasonable while also agreeing that my connection between you and om makes you both look like scum. therefore I cant be being unreasonable.

im off now, but basically, its DCL and Om as scum. It seems pretty obv. I will claim if someone shows intent.

he doesnt say that it is your connection that does it though, he is saying it is om making it look like that, unless i am understanding wrong.

↑ Slandaar wrote:im off now, but basically, its DCL and Om as scum. It seems pretty obv. I will claim if someone shows intent.

Is there a point in claiming? I mean everyone in the town is a doctor except for the one nurse.

Unless he just softclaimed nurse, although not completely sure on that.

so you want someone to hammer me without me claiming?

are you 2 both scum?

seriously?

its dcl/thom

has to be

that is actually so scummy between the 2

DCL even knows theres a nurse but says OH WHY CLAIM SLAND LETS JUST HAMMER U THERE AINT NO POINT

get on this scumbag

oh so you are misrepping me now? where did i say i wanted someone to hammer you without the claim? Where did i even imply that?
How does DC trying to hammer with no claim make me his scum partner? Please explain, i am listening.

↑ Thomith wrote:Unless he just softclaimed nurse, although not completely sure on that.

This is scum posting

is why.

you both went very quiet

lol

that really was the scummiest couple of posts ever

↑ Slandaar wrote:so you want someone to hammer me without me claiming?

are you 2 both scum?

seriously?

I never said I wanted someone to hammer you before a claim, I just found it odd you want want to claim when there doesn't seem like a lot to claim.

↑ Slandaar wrote:its dcl/thom

has to be

that is actually so scummy between the 2

[sarcasm]What? I though me and om were scum, I mean you had me so convinced by your reasonable arguments. [sarcasm]

↑ Slandaar wrote:DCL even knows theres a nurse but says OH WHY CLAIM SLAND LETS JUST HAMMER U THERE AINT NO POINT

get on this scumbag

I am very certain I never said "OH WHY CLAIM SLAND LETS JUST HAMMER U THERE AINT NO POINT" [sarcasm]Oh dang, oops I said it now. [sarcasm]

where did i say i wanted you lynched or infer i wanted you lynched with no claim, THERE IS NOTHING OTHER THAN DOCTOR APART FROM NURSE, which is why by you saying "ill claim if someone shows intent" made me thing you be softclaiming nurse.