Page 9 of 70
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 4:10 pm
by Yates
I know. So why did you do it? AND, why are you now trying to pretend you didn't? That sounds like you didn't think your play through. So *I* have to try to interpret *that* [see wut I did thar?].
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 4:24 pm
by Psyche
You're breaking my balls, Yates.
Why do you think it important to clear away the ambiguity and WIFOM that I've tried to create?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 4:52 pm
by PeregrineV
↑ PeregrineV wrote:@Psyche- That was a pretty bad fake dayvig. What did you expect from it? And I know someone asked something about it, but your answer seemed lacking.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 4:56 pm
by Psyche
I'm not experienced enough to know what my behaviors are supposed to do. I'm just experimenting with different techniques to see what happens. >.>
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 4:57 pm
by Acosmist
I'm going to think more about this game tomorrow. I can't think straight right now. Psyche is scum tho
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:12 pm
by Thor665
↑ Psyche wrote:I'm not experienced enough to know what my behaviors are supposed to do. I'm just experimenting with different techniques to see what happens. >.>
Isn't that why we have the Newbie queue so the kids with grandiose self-delusions don't clog up relevant game threads so it doesn't rob time from my grandiose delusions.
Seriously, this is terrible - I'm calling it a policy lynch as well and I think he's scummy o top of that. I don't need newbie cards being played on me here.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:28 pm
by Psyche
↑ Thor665 wrote: ↑ Psyche wrote:I'm not experienced enough to know what my behaviors are supposed to do. I'm just experimenting with different techniques to see what happens. >.>
Isn't that why we have the Newbie queue so the kids with grandiose self-delusions don't clog up relevant game threads so it doesn't rob time from my grandiose delusions.
Seriously, this is terrible - I'm calling it a policy lynch as well and I think he's scummy o top of that. I don't need newbie cards being played on me here.
Oh, no. I'm not dropping newbie cards. I'm just pointing out that I'm not expecting anything from my antics (and why), and it's useless to expect otherwise.
And you still haven't provided one good reason that I am scummy.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:42 pm
by pappums rat
Votecount 1.3
Acosmist - 2 (dicknose, Benmage)
Thor665 - 1 (JohnnyFarrar)
Psyche - 2 (Acosmist, Thor665)
MattP - 2 (Yates, Slandaar)
dicknose - 2 (MattP, BK201)
JohnnyFarrar - 1 (PeregrineV)
Not voting - (Agent_Ireland, iDanyBoy, Psyche)
With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.
The deadline for Day 1 is 1 AM EST on July 5, 2012.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:44 pm
by Benmage
*peer*
Okay than, I'll catch up tomorrow.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:48 pm
by Bricktoes
↑ Psyche wrote:I'm not experienced enough to know what my behaviors are supposed to do. I'm just experimenting with different techniques to see what happens. >.>
VOTE: Psych
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:59 pm
by Thor665
↑ Psyche wrote:Oh, no. I'm not dropping newbie cards. I'm just pointing out that I'm not expecting anything from my antics (and why), and it's useless to expect otherwise.
And you still haven't provided one good reason that I am scummy.
You just defended yourself by admitting you don't know what to expect from your "scumhunting" or even what it will generate, if anything.
But you're an authority on what makes a case valid or not?
Child, please.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:41 pm
by Bricktoes
Also Thor, I still don't understand how me reading isos is scummy.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:07 pm
by Thor665
I just tend to believe anyone saying they're isoing people when there are only around 6 pages of actual conversation are lying out their backside trying to look like they're doing more than they are.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:18 pm
by Bricktoes
That's fair. I figured I'd start now so I'd have an easier time doing it later.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:22 pm
by Thor665
Isn't the entire point of doing it later that you'll have new context to look at the old posts with?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:23 pm
by Thor665
I mean, if I was scum and wanted to have some fake isos on tap it would work out fine, because I could make up whatever I wanted with a goal for later.
But as town, I'm just not sure how it would help me. It'd be somewhat like me saying I'm re-reading pages 8-9...yeah, I could DO it, sure - but what would it get me?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:23 pm
by MattP
Spoiler: Dicknose is lying
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:24 pm
by Thor665
Which would annoy me, because it would make Psyche more likely to be town, and I'm already in two Newbies.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:28 pm
by MattP
So? We have a scum. Be greatful for the fruits the Earth hast given to ye
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:31 pm
by Bricktoes
The bonus is that when I did it there had been about a hundred posts in the game and a couple of posters with about twenty posts and I can scroll back and forth through those looking for common threads. The bonus for later I'm hoping is I'm less likely to assume someone scumslipped by contradicting something else they said I won't go back to find I only confused their post with someone else's.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:52 pm
by Psyche
↑ Thor665 wrote: ↑ Psyche wrote:Oh, no. I'm not dropping newbie cards. I'm just pointing out that I'm not expecting anything from my antics (and why), and it's useless to expect otherwise.
And you still haven't provided one good reason that I am scummy.
You just defended yourself by admitting you don't know what to expect from your "scumhunting" or even what it will generate, if anything.
But you're an authority on what makes a case valid or not?
Child, please.
asdfghjkll
I'm going to post again when I'm a little less angry. >.>
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:38 pm
by Thor665
That will toy with my antics of whose results I am totally uncertain of but am doing anyway.
@Matt - indeed, and if we lynch him and he flips scum I'll happiily toss Psyche into the town pool of will be ignored, but it's hardly like erection nostril has a lockdown on saying things that sound daft and derp and like a lie in this thread. You've played with Psyche-newb before, yes? I presume you find his play congruous with what you've seen before (with him as town is my perception) but what is your take on him claiming that there is no tell worth spitting at as regards the BK paranoia tell? *should* he have grokked it as a good tell, or was that just you ribbing him or something?
Also, was he always such a wimp with his vote when town last time? He opened hyper aggressive but has now gone all passive - normal?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:41 pm
by Thor665
@dicknose - you and I played together in a Newbie if I'm recalling correctly. Since for me it was Tuesday and for you it was a chance to play with me, do you recall the specific game number? (a link could be cool too, but I'm comfortable hunting down the number)
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:47 pm
by Thor665
Nevermind - it was 1147 and you replaced in.
You got any links to townstart games where you talked about isoing within the first 7-10 pages?
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:49 pm
by JohnnyFarrar
I'm mostly skimming because I'm mad that there are people in this round who don't know DBZ.
bleh. I think your reason is stupid.
I agree with Matt about Dicknose's 117. Claiming that people would fake flavor knowledge seems unnecessary and odd. I'll read Dicknose later though.
I'm actually pretty comfortable with my vote staying on Thor. - Thor, I don't know if you're just lazy this round, but
144 doesn't seem like you (not the vote, the rest of it). Normally for me, establishing town players is a town trait, but you say you have town reads without saying who any of them are. It's confusingly weird for you.