Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:59 am
I did a full reread, but I don't think a summary of the action is totally necessary because Johnny just provided a fairly comprehensive one a couple pages back (although the majority of it simply repeats what others said to that point).
In said Johnny post, I see a lot of mimicking of the popular opinions at the time each post he comments on was made. This makes sense - it's hard coming into a game partway through without being able to ask your own questions. However, he calls me out for having the same opinions he does to that point (which I find odd, since he agrees with what I say). He also sheeps nh at nearly every chance he's got. As stated, most of what Johnny says in that post is really not necessary, as the majority of his comments are just "I agree" or "I disagree" and don't provide anything new or shed original light on scenarios. He seems to be trying to establish himself in the game as a neutral player, and makes sure to sidle up to the players that are generally agreed upon as town - in short, nothing controversial at all (other than advocating a policy lynch, which I'll come back to), which makes his post seem more self-serving than useful.
Additionally, while Johnny states that his two biggest scumreads are on myself and nh, it's bizarre to me that he'd list us both as scum while actively acknowledging that he doesn't think we're a scumteam. nh's dispute of Johny's charge is just weird though - he states that "to the rest of the town", at most one of either myself, johnny, or nh is scum. Why is he speaking for the whole town? This seems like a slip to me - if he's got more info than the rest of us, I can see how it would be easy for him to step into the town's shoes.
jambecca is nothing more than a complete waste of time. he actually actively avoids giving opinions on anything despite posting several times.
Maggot, I really don't see the utility in holding your opinions to yourself in the instance of your scumteam speculation. Forcing their hand would have been a more useful move imo. However, you're still cleared for me due to the previously mentioned reason, so this comes across as a bad move and nothing more.
Johnny slinks off his idea of a policy lynch after he's been called out on it. Johnny also focuses a hell of a lot on sematics with regards to nh. He even does a reread of other games in order to clear nh for the charges Johnny himself made. To be honest this looks a lot like distancing, which nh looked to be doing with nekoko way back at the start of the day.
Cheery, I don't get your point when you put me at an unofficial L-1 - asking if nh thinks his vote is in the right place is not agreeing that it should be on me.
I don't think Jason's scum-read on Maggot is scum-motivated, but it definitely seems off-base because her interation with Pasch early on more or less clears her (based on the scum-chat before the game confimation).
I will catch up with the most recent posts in a little while but I see City's is absolutely massive and I don't have enough time ATM to respond to it fully. Be back with my response to the second half of page 8 and my current reads shortly.
Sidenote: we have six days left until deadline so there's no reason to rush-lynch me. I want to get as much out there as possible so that you can reflect on it later if you do decide I'm who you're going to lynch, because it seems fairly inevitable at this point.
In said Johnny post, I see a lot of mimicking of the popular opinions at the time each post he comments on was made. This makes sense - it's hard coming into a game partway through without being able to ask your own questions. However, he calls me out for having the same opinions he does to that point (which I find odd, since he agrees with what I say). He also sheeps nh at nearly every chance he's got. As stated, most of what Johnny says in that post is really not necessary, as the majority of his comments are just "I agree" or "I disagree" and don't provide anything new or shed original light on scenarios. He seems to be trying to establish himself in the game as a neutral player, and makes sure to sidle up to the players that are generally agreed upon as town - in short, nothing controversial at all (other than advocating a policy lynch, which I'll come back to), which makes his post seem more self-serving than useful.
Additionally, while Johnny states that his two biggest scumreads are on myself and nh, it's bizarre to me that he'd list us both as scum while actively acknowledging that he doesn't think we're a scumteam. nh's dispute of Johny's charge is just weird though - he states that "to the rest of the town", at most one of either myself, johnny, or nh is scum. Why is he speaking for the whole town? This seems like a slip to me - if he's got more info than the rest of us, I can see how it would be easy for him to step into the town's shoes.
jambecca is nothing more than a complete waste of time. he actually actively avoids giving opinions on anything despite posting several times.
Maggot, I really don't see the utility in holding your opinions to yourself in the instance of your scumteam speculation. Forcing their hand would have been a more useful move imo. However, you're still cleared for me due to the previously mentioned reason, so this comes across as a bad move and nothing more.
Johnny slinks off his idea of a policy lynch after he's been called out on it. Johnny also focuses a hell of a lot on sematics with regards to nh. He even does a reread of other games in order to clear nh for the charges Johnny himself made. To be honest this looks a lot like distancing, which nh looked to be doing with nekoko way back at the start of the day.
Cheery, I don't get your point when you put me at an unofficial L-1 - asking if nh thinks his vote is in the right place is not agreeing that it should be on me.
I don't think Jason's scum-read on Maggot is scum-motivated, but it definitely seems off-base because her interation with Pasch early on more or less clears her (based on the scum-chat before the game confimation).
I will catch up with the most recent posts in a little while but I see City's is absolutely massive and I don't have enough time ATM to respond to it fully. Be back with my response to the second half of page 8 and my current reads shortly.
Sidenote: we have six days left until deadline so there's no reason to rush-lynch me. I want to get as much out there as possible so that you can reflect on it later if you do decide I'm who you're going to lynch, because it seems fairly inevitable at this point.