Page 9 of 82

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:40 am
by Number Six
Another read through.

Fe wrote:I may of forgotten that there were town PRs....
That was where I got my scum slip from.


Who forgets the possibility of town PRs?
That's just a lazy attempt at scum hunting.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:49 pm
by Kmd4390
Director, so I am scum for my early game playstyle?

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:51 pm
by RachMarie


Vote Count 1.5

Number Six (3) Majiffy++, Breakfast, Fe, Kmd4390
Majiffy++ (1) pirate mollie
Breakfast (1) Lastsurvivor, Borkjerfkin
:right: Fizz (4) the director, penguin_alien, Number Six, uctriton00, Kmd4390


Not Voting

Malakittens, Fizz, Nobody Special


++ Technically it was Fitz at this time, but since shortly thereafter Majiffy rejoined in this slot I am keeping it Majiffy.



With 14 it takes 8 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2012-12-01 16:09:23)


Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:56 pm
by Breakfast
Nobody Special, did you expect your fake daykill thing was actually going to get a reaction?

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:53 pm
by havingfitz
UNVOTE: ......BTW

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:09 pm
by Majiffy
havingfitz wrote:If Majiffy wants back in now that Aether is out I'll let him back in. Just throwing that potential option out there.

's up to Rach. I wouldn't mind playing now that he's gone.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:54 pm
by Lastsurvivor
Nothing substantial, however some random questions to the lurkers (who you guys are totally letting off the hook, FYI).

Malakittens wrote:I'm active lurking??..


Yes. Why do you think you're not?

Breakfast, explain the significance of your questions in #16 and #203.

Fe I have no question for but I just want to point out that out of all the lurkers he's the most likely to be scum.

Uct - The only reads of yours we know are Fizz scum and Aether town. Any other reads?

penguin_alien wrote:I'm reluctant to move my vote off Fizz when he still hasn't actually answered the question of whether he's scum. Although it seems more like he's ignoring the question altogether after giving an unsatisfactory response the first time. Scum afraid to draw attention back to it, or town uncertain about how to dig out?


This reads as "I don't have anywhere else to put my vote so I'm just going to justify my current vote even though I feel self conscious about it." You're keeping your vote because he hasn't answered a rhetorical question? The reaction he gave was good enough.

Just to repeat: You guys are letting 5/14 of the game hide in the shadows while you all bicker and dramallama at each other. Hopefully you guys get back on track now that Aether's gone, but the amount of lurkers in this game is too high.

Tomorrow afternoon you can expect a vote and a list from me hopefully.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 4:30 pm
by Malakittens
Because I have actually been posting my reads, answering questions and asking questions. I don't see that as "active" lurking. I just see it as being active.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 4:54 pm
by Breakfast
Lastsurvivor wrote:
Breakfast, explain the significance of your questions in #16 and #203.

16 - Was wondering if they were feeling too self-aware of their behavior to confirm publicly - i.e. Will it look suspicious if I confirm too early/too late/immediately before/after my scum buddy

203 - I have a potential followup pending a response.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 5:48 pm
by RachMarie
Replacing havingfitz with Majiffy welcome back Majiffy

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 5:52 pm
by Majiffy
Hi. Thanks Rach.

Going to wait and see what Aether's replacement is like a bit more before I put the vote back on the slot.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 7:18 pm
by pirate mollie
Majiffy wrote:Hi. Thanks Rach.

Going to wait and see what Aether's replacement is like a bit more before I put the vote back on the slot.


just so you know I had typed out this big long post when you first asked to be subbed out that began with calling you a big giant baby. sweet irony. didn't post it though cos it looked like your sub was under way.

so now that you are over your spack attack with aether what else do you got.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 7:43 pm
by Majiffy
Kmd is still scum, so I guess that's cool.

Do we have Kmd-wagon-support? If so I reckon we should get that going. Fizz wagon is fucktarded.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:13 pm
by pirate mollie
okay. let's see where this goes.

VOTE: kmd4390

liking malacat for town.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:14 pm
by Kmd4390
Why is he posting from a scum mindset if he is town? Meaning the whole not wanting to expose himself as scum if he's scum thing. Show me how he is town if you honestly believe he is.

*sigh*

I'm worried that this is the classic case where scum is so scummy Day 1 that the wagon builds too fast and people don't want to be wagoners so they call the wagon dumb and the truly scummy player town just based on that. Am I close?

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:16 pm
by Majiffy
No. What you call a scumslip is definitely not even possibly a scumslip. This is you (collectively, the wagoneers) bathing in confirmation bias.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:17 pm
by Majiffy
And I'm not talking subtle bathing, I'm talking little rubber duckie Ernie from Sesame Street splish splash bathing.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:27 pm
by Kmd4390
If it's confirmation bias, how am I scum?

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:37 pm
by pirate mollie
Image

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:44 pm
by Majiffy
Kmd4390 wrote:If it's confirmation bias, how am I scum?

Majiffy wrote:No. What you call a scumslip is definitely not even possibly a scumslip. This is you
(collectively, the wagoneers)
bathing in confirmation bias.

Image

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:02 pm
by Nobody Special
Breakfast wrote:Nobody Special, did you expect your fake daykill thing was actually going to get a reaction?

Of course I did, that's why I did it. And it worked, huh?

Fizz is still scum, I don't care what anyone else says.

However, for the moment, I'll see where this goes.

unvote

Vote: Kmd

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:15 pm
by Majiffy
T
here
u
sed
t
o
b
e
a
standard to reaction testing that involved outting what you were looking for. Now it's all
g
raying with people not wanting it to lose its effectiveness later on. I personally think it's stupid and a little scummy to let an obvious reaction test's results
t
ower over a game wherein you can just leave it
a
lone and claim it whenever you want later
o
n down
t
he road. Or
s
ea. Whatever floats your boat.

Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:09 am
by Number Six
Majiffy wrote:
T
here
u
sed
t
o
b
e
a
standard to reaction testing that involved outting what you were looking for. Now it's all
g
raying with people not wanting it to lose its effectiveness later on. I personally think it's stupid and a little scummy to let an obvious reaction test's results
t
ower over a game wherein you can just leave it
a
lone and claim it whenever you want later
o
n down
t
he road. Or
s
ea. Whatever floats your boat.


Is that some sort of coded message there, with the italics?

There used to be a greying tower alone on the sea.

Very poetic

Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 4:40 am
by borkjerfkin
The Director wrote:tryharding

What's the scum motivation for doing what you're accusing kmd of doing (which honestly, I'm not even sure what that is?)

I'm not liking Fe right now, for the same reasons as Number Six isn't liking him.

Kmd has moved into murky null territory -- #190, #194 (mostly #194) are town things. I can't read Majiffy either; I disagree with pretty much everything he's said this game and that's rare. #221 is ?

Mollie, Mala are fine. NS (I don't think I've ever seen a obvfake [Dayaction] from scum), LS, 6 are probably fine.

Fizz isn't a bad wagon (it's miles better than Aether was) but I'm always really cautious when trying to make newbie reads, so in regards to kmd #214 -- this is the source of my hesitation, personally.

Breakfast is scummy.

Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 4:52 am
by pirate mollie
agree about breakfast.

majiffy, if you wanted aether policy lynched why did you not just say so instead of creating some bogus case on him?