"There's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people." -William Adama
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:13 am
by fferyllt
Could be Nero, but what a crappy way to play as scum. There's no glory trolling mafia games.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:13 am
by buldermar
I was about to say that I oppose policy lynching but if everyone else looks town then the best thing may be to lynch one of the inactive players. But there's still a lot of time left, so let's wait and see what happens.
I don't really read you as town, but perhaps I have too high expectations of you as town based on your offsite performance.
↑Nero wrote:Scum pool [pitoli, fferyllt, Syryana, Lurker]
What is your exclusion of scot from the scum pool based on?
I have sources.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:23 am
by fferyllt
↑buldermar wrote:I was about to say that I oppose policy lynching but if everyone else looks town then the best thing may be to lynch one of the inactive players. But there's still a lot of time left, so let's wait and see what happens.
I don't really read you as town, but perhaps I have too high expectations of you as town based on your offsite performance.
So far, I seem to look more town as the MS games progress. That was actually true of most of my games elsewhere until about 10 months ago. Still making a lot of adjustments, and not all of them are planned.
↑Nero wrote:Scum pool [pitoli, fferyllt, Syryana, Lurker]
What is your exclusion of scot from the scum pool based on?
I have sources.
This is one of these moments where I wish that the "must play to your win condition" rule was a bit more well-defined - it may have been handy.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:30 am
by Nero
I'll expand on the situation on day 2, if required.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:32 am
by buldermar
Good, because I was just about to ask the mod for a clarification of the rule.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:33 am
by buldermar
Actually, I don't like the sound of post 214 at all. Why would you suddently quit the trolling mode only to promise to clarify on day 2?
VOTE: Nero
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:34 am
by fferyllt
Re "quicklynch" maybe I'm using the term wrong. Does it only apply to the start up of a game day? I have been thinking of any sudden and fast moving bandwagon as a potential quicklynch.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:35 am
by buldermar
I think the term is usually used to describe a lynch that happens long before deadline
and
rapidly, but I could be wrong.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:36 am
by fferyllt
↑buldermar wrote:Actually, I don't like the sound of post 214 at all. Why would you suddently quit the trolling mode only to promise to clarify on day 2?
VOTE: Nero
That wasn't trolling mode? Rereading.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:37 am
by fferyllt
↑buldermar wrote:I think the term is usually used to describe a lynch that happens long before deadline
and
rapidly, but I could be wrong.
Depending on what "long before" means, then I think I'm correct in describing the KBW wagon in that nightless game as a potential quicklynch.
↑buldermar wrote:Actually, I don't like the sound of post 214 at all. Why would you suddently quit the trolling mode only to promise to clarify on day 2?
VOTE: Nero
That wasn't trolling mode? Rereading.
Sarcasm translates really poorly to my native language and sometimes I misinterpret things. What was the trolling aspect of that post? It looked quite serious to me.
. that puts both the scum in a pool of six. i didn't like sorry, syryana or pitoli's starts and since there was already a vote on syryana i decided to pop another one on.