Mafiascum.net

I already said why

I can add how you don't like people putting other's in L-2 and will call anyone a scum if they put him in L-1.
Why'd you vote him at all in the first place? Add in that Your theory is flawed. That 1 or 2 (or maybe even 3) May have already been the wagon. Heck, you're also in the wagon. Stating that putting irish at L-1 makes it a scumtell can mean that you're setting somebody else up.

In post 90, Ghostlin wrote:Now, if you link me to a chk game, particularly a mini, where he used a Cult or a single SK as the antagonist, I would gladly redact my assumption of two scum.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=26302

I Like how you ignore my vote and How you get "curious" when someone else pointed it out

Loving your OMGUS.

Who?

DP, who believes that if I vote for him, I'm not town anymore.

In post 200, thenewearth wrote:I already said why

I can add how you don't like people putting other's in L-2 and will call anyone a scum if they put him in L-1.
Why'd you vote him at all in the first place? Add in that Your theory is flawed. That 1 or 2 (or maybe even 3) May have already been the wagon. Heck, you're also in the wagon. Stating that putting irish at L-1 makes it a scumtell can mean that you're setting somebody else up.

In post 90, Ghostlin wrote:Now, if you link me to a chk game, particularly a mini, where he used a Cult or a single SK as the antagonist, I would gladly redact my assumption of two scum.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=26302

I Like how you ignore my vote and How you get "curious" when someone else pointed it out

You know? I'm not even going to answer this case. This is retread of Irish's case and I had a rant post dripping with how stupid you are in answer to this. We've already discussed this for three pages. I'm not going back to. You want to vote me over it, fine, but I find it exquisitely thick you're even using the number of scum as the same argument in one of your posts when you assumed the exact same thing.

I have actual scumhunting to do rather than defend something I did Day 1, have done in the past regardless of alignment, and actually isn't scummy. I thought you'd have, you know, new stuff except 'tee-hee, Ghost is scum because of the comment he made at L-2'.

Give me a fucking break.

Add some bit of AtE

Pope, I state my reasons for that vote. Besides I have you as a scum read. Did you seriously ISO me or did you just jump at the chance at a BW?

Funny how I went from town to scum in one post, but whatever. I wouldn't consider this a BW.

TIP, when the fuck did I call you town? Did you really ISO me?

So you didn't have a town read on me? Then why didn't you vote for me before?

Stop avoiding my questions. The simple fact that you need to ask that already indicates that you really didnt ISO me. I've already said in that same post ISO 12 where you said I didnt give my reads, I found you, Bacde and Ghostlin scummy. And I've explained I'm a cautios voter.

Well, I did ISO you. Town would say their reads and then ask for someone else's. You on the other hand...
And OMGUS is super cautious according to you. Nice.

Pope I cant even begin to explain how hypocritical you are being right now. You ask for everyone's reads then only give yours when I ask for it. I on the other hand ask for reads and give mine, in the same post. SMH

I don't see what's wrong with asking for reads but abstaining from giving mine. I have the right to remain silent

In post 211, TheIrishPope wrote:Well, I did ISO you. Town would say their reads and then ask for someone else's. You on the other hand...
And OMGUS is super cautious according to you. Nice.

In post 213, TheIrishPope wrote:I don't see what's wrong with asking for reads but abstaining from giving mine. I have the right to remain silent

What the fuck?

In post 213, TheIrishPope wrote:I don't see what's wrong with asking for reads but abstaining from giving mine. I have the right to remain silent

NO. YOU ONLY HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT IF WE GET TO LYNCH YOU FOR IT.

You don't get to flake on your reads if we ask you them unless you want to get lynched.

213 is probably the most offensive thing to scum hunting I've ever read. The only reason my vote's not fucking parked back on TIP...wait, wait...there really is no fucking reasoning.

In post 186, DoctorPepper wrote:I'm seeing dissonance when it comes to Fuzzy and Bel's posts. Bel asks me whats wrong with being suspicious but when Fuzzy asks sword, "if he finds people scummy, why dont you vote for them?" So correct me if I'm wrong there.

Hydra dissonance is pretty normal. You're not wrong. However...what precisely are you driving at?

-B

In post 213, TheIrishPope wrote:I don't see what's wrong with asking for reads but abstaining from giving mine. I have the right to remain silent

Is the smilie supposed to somehow make this statement less terrible? it didn't work.

so are we going back to lynching TIP?

because thats something I'd support

Hamlet, never played with Hydras before, so I was wondering why was there an internal shaft or something

Let's chill for a minute.
UNVOTE:
You guys have to take this less seriously. I didn't give my reads because I didn't have any. It's easier to not say anything than say "oh, you're all null." So, first of all, take everyone into consideration and don't tunnel on me. Second, don't put your panties in a bunch. You're all exaggerating.

I'm not voting you right now because as terrible as that comment was, I can't imagine it getting past a scum player's self-censoring process.

Precisely. I was just messing around. It's early D1, so people shouldn't be this ecstatic.