Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:10 pm
Usually I play on the #mafia IRC.How many games have you played on this site?
People really say that stupid stuff, huh? Well, I have to go now but I'll give more opinions later.
Usually I play on the #mafia IRC.How many games have you played on this site?
Sure, but there's a reason I haven't posted it -- to wit, it's useless:In post 193, Ghostlin wrote:Also, I'd like to hear Beli's reads, and thoughts.
If Nero is scum, Bel is the partner.In post 203, Belisarius wrote:Nero: #83 shows that he was leery of 'shake before the vote was placed, which makes #85 null, not scummy; #105 shows a kind of mindset which I share, which makes me more sanguine about him.
town don't say this. FFery seems like she'd fight things tooth and nail.In post 191, Selkies wrote:I like your analyses, Amrun.
So I should have wanted a Matt P lynch 'cause I mentioned that he fake claims as both alignments? Why do you think it took them 11 posts before they agreed with you? Why not agree with you when we actually had our argument? They even voted you first.In post 195, milkshake wrote:I know you didn't, but it followed from what you had said at that point that you SHOULD have. To demonstrate this, we can take a look at post #133 by Selkies where they express the same opinion.In post 180, Nero Cain wrote:yea, I never pushed for a Matt lynch.In post 177, milkshake wrote:because the bulk of the rationale for MattP's lynch came from an opinion held by Nero
In post 207, Sugar Cain wrote:town don't say this. FFery seems like she'd fight things tooth and nail.In post 191, Selkies wrote:I like your analyses, Amrun.
So I should have wanted a Matt P lynch 'cause I mentioned that he fake claims as both alignments? Why do you think it took them 11 posts before they agreed with you? Why not agree with you when we actually had our argument? They even voted you first.In post 195, milkshake wrote:I know you didn't, but it followed from what you had said at that point that you SHOULD have. To demonstrate this, we can take a look at post #133 by Selkies where they express the same opinion.In post 180, Nero Cain wrote:yea, I never pushed for a Matt lynch.In post 177, milkshake wrote:because the bulk of the rationale for MattP's lynch came from an opinion held by Nero
Come on Amrun, lets lynch Selk today.
Technically, you should have wanted a MattP lynch because he claims early as town and fakeclaims early as scum. This was under the assumption of "Never lie as town" being universally accepted strategy here. Which apparently it might not be?I should have wanted a Matt P lynch 'cause I mentioned that he fake claims as both alignments?
FFery is more interested in figuring out if people are town or scum than in what they think about her alignment, especially when playing as a hydra. And an effortlessly well reasoned argument for finding something I post questionable usually makes a townish impression on me.In post 208, Nero Cain wrote:town don't say this. FFery seems like she'd fight things tooth and nail.
So why you didn't vote Matt?In post 209, milkshake wrote:Technically, you should have wanted a MattP lynch because he claims early as town and fakeclaims early as scum. This was under the assumption of "Never lie as town" being universally accepted strategy here. Which apparently it might not be?I should have wanted a Matt P lynch 'cause I mentioned that he fake claims as both alignments?
to this:MsDes wrote:I actually like Omens post, it has good questions and I feel that his vote is one of the few on the wagon that has some merit
with no in between?MsDes wrote:I'll talk to HD about where to place our vote, but right now my favorite people to vote are Ghost, Demon,and SoO
This here ^In post 212, Nero Cain wrote:So why you didn't vote Matt?In post 209, milkshake wrote:Technically, you should have wanted a MattP lynch because he claims early as town and fakeclaims early as scum. This was under the assumption of "Never lie as town" being universally accepted strategy here. Which apparently it might not be?I should have wanted a Matt P lynch 'cause I mentioned that he fake claims as both alignments?
Well, it was in the form of a statement, but that's just splitting hairs.In post 197, Ghostlin wrote:But, actually, of equal importance is your reaction to Selkies #191.
1) No, I'm voting for Milk because a push on a claimed VT is pretty terrible, actually. Also, she didn't even bother to back her conviction with a vote.In post 215, Miss Destroyer wrote:Ghost: If you mean the post where you voted for milkshake, then yeah I read it but I didn't find any decent reasoning behind that post. It seems you are voting Milk because you don't agree with him, and because you see things that he doesn't?
Why are you seemingly worried about your gut getting you in trouble? I'm taking that phrase to mean that it usually gets alot of heat placed in your direction and has a plausibility of getting you lynched? that isn't something that town is worried about.
Why do you have a problem with me calling out cops for lurking? Selk is lurking but that's likely scum anyways. You're lurking a bit. So, sure, I'll entertain the idea that you are scum but I'm more interested in a milk/selk/soo group but sure, I can do a milk/selk/soo/missdes group.In post 215, Miss Destroyer wrote:why are you calling cops out for lurking when others are doing the same?
lolIn post 222, Nero Cain wrote:Why do you have a problem with me calling out cops for lurking? Selk is lurking but that's likely scum anyways. You're lurking a bit. So, sure, I'll entertain the idea that you are scum but I'm more interested in a milk/selk/soo group but sure, I can do a milk/selk/soo/missdes group.In post 215, Miss Destroyer wrote:why are you calling cops out for lurking when others are doing the same?
So who wants to claim to be the stupid townie?