Mafiascum.net

In post 196, fferyllt wrote:

In post 195, Pjovek wrote:

In post 194, fferyllt wrote:

In post 192, enomis wrote:Did it occured to you: (zach, fferyllt and pjovek) that he did not read this thread considering his post is only 2 at other forums and they are only 2 mins apart. Which means there is a high chance that he viewed other forums on mobile and did not read this thread( my interpretation) Thoughts?

A mobile driveby did not occur to me, no. Though you're right that the activity level suggests a driveby.

Do you have a problem with him being at L-2 given your case?

Stahp it.
He's at L-1.

You sure? zachrules voted twice because he wasn't sure the name abbreviation would count.

Yes.
I can even count up to ten, my mother is very proud of me.


And I'd rather not have a random quickhammer because people think he's at L-2 when he's at L-1, that always leads to undesireable situations.

I am terrible at counting.

Maybe mother should have teach you too by hit with stick when do error.

This makes learn fast.

hey all!!!
back from V/LA and glad to see this one up and running...
gonna read up this morning and get to posting today...9 pages shouldn't be too bad....

In post 197, enomis wrote:@zach:It weakens your case a lot actually we have seen no follow up because he has not read this thread at all(my interpretation). But bah.

Well I mean it's possible he hasn't, but I don't find it the most likely reason.

Can someone unvote, please? I don't like that wagon, and I especially don't like that L-1 this early into the game.

In post 205, Tierce wrote:Can someone unvote, please? I don't like that wagon, and I especially don't like that L-1 this early into the game.

Ok.

UNVOTE: whimsical eggplant

All it took was for Tierce to ask nicerly ffery?

What don't you like about the wagon Tierce?

Reasoning and speed and this game's mechanics. I don't think he's scum, so.

And considering I'm voting the lady up there and she is more interested on my request for an unvote than on my reasons for voting her, color me intrigued. A word that here means "Hey guys, she really scum!"

(OTOH, I ask really nicely. And on occasion provide puppy pictures. You have to understand how much that might entice people to do as I ask. /)u@.@u(\)

In post 208, Tierce wrote:Reasoning and speed and this game's mechanics. I don't think he's scum, so.

And considering I'm voting the lady up there and she is more interested on my request for an unvote than on my reasons for voting her, color me intrigued. A word that here means "Hey guys, she really

is

scum!"

I will confess I don't much care for her vote on the wagon or her reactions to inquiries on the wagon, which led to an unvote which came way too easily.

But that's why god invented bussing. There's nothing to say they can't be scum.

In post 207, Zachrulez wrote:All it took was for Tierce to ask nicerly ffery?

pretty much. I don't think one vote (which I'll put back on the wagon if whimsical eggplant's eventual response is underwhelming) makes a huge difference pressure-wise, and removing it mitigates the risk of a derphammer.

In post 211, fferyllt wrote:

In post 207, Zachrulez wrote:All it took was for Tierce to ask nicerly ffery?

pretty much. I don't think one vote (which I'll put back on the wagon if whimsical eggplant's eventual response is underwhelming) makes a huge difference pressure-wise, and removing it mitigates the risk of a derphammer.

Let's make a huge difference pressure-wise here instead, shall we?

In post 211, fferyllt wrote:

In post 207, Zachrulez wrote:All it took was for Tierce to ask nicerly ffery?

pretty much. I don't think one vote (which I'll put back on the wagon if whimsical eggplant's eventual response is underwhelming) makes a huge difference pressure-wise, and removing it mitigates the risk of a derphammer.

Au contraire

Maybe it makes no difference in regard to Eggplant himself, but it is a glorious game of chicken in regard to the people on the wagon itself.
It is sad you flaked so early.

In post 213, Pjovek wrote:

In post 211, fferyllt wrote:

In post 207, Zachrulez wrote:All it took was for Tierce to ask nicerly ffery?

pretty much. I don't think one vote (which I'll put back on the wagon if whimsical eggplant's eventual response is underwhelming) makes a huge difference pressure-wise, and removing it mitigates the risk of a derphammer.

Au contraire

Maybe it makes no difference in regard to Eggplant himself, but it is a glorious game of chicken in regard to the people on the wagon itself.
It is sad you flaked so early.

I don't have a lot of stomach for chicken, though I am working on it. instant majority lynch is a second language.

I suppose not eating yourself may be wise, but i digress.

, how do this games mechanics affect your read on Whimsy and the wagon on her?

pjo, why'd you think to vote Sword of Omens when you did?

About Ffery: she said "I assume pjo gambits no matter what alignment he is." When I asked her about it, she replied with "I was asking mrbungles because they've played together elsewhere." There was no question mark in her original post - this has been bothering me for a while, but I'm worried that it's just me being pedantic. I agree with Matt that this comment: "But, if he doesn't gambit irrespective of alignment he'd be awfully easy to spot as scum. So yeah, I think he gambits no matter what his alignment" looks baseless, since she was (apparently) asking mrbungles about pjo's scum play. It could simply just be that he's easy to spot as scum.

It obvious that ffrey was buddying with pjo, and I don't understand her prob-town read on mrbungles.

So there are somethings that I don't like here. I still don't think that she's as bad as Whimsical Eggplant or mrbungles.

Because sword was a great day1 lynch (and still is)

In the meantime he has dodged replacement forcing with promises of more lurking, so yeah. A good lynch indeed.


Also should I share my super-secret way of reading ffery as town?
It'll cost you though.

In post 217, Pjovek wrote:Because sword was a great day1 lynch (and still is)

In the meantime he has dodged replacement forcing with promises of more lurking, so yeah. A good lynch indeed.


Also should I share my super-secret way of reading ffery as town?
It'll cost you though.

Where did sword promise to do more lurking?
Do you think that he's a great lynch because he hadn't posted or is there something else?

Of course you should share.

In post 217, Pjovek wrote:Because sword was a great day1 lynch (and still is)

In the meantime he has dodged replacement forcing with promises of more lurking, so yeah. A good lynch indeed.


Also should I share my super-secret way of reading ffery as town?
It'll cost you though.

Ah fuck it I can't hold my bowels.

Behold the power of my scumhunting:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... overview=1
Scum is Eggplant, sword and implosion.
fferyllt is the most town.
Don't get mislead by actiondan, he's not actually in the game.

Pjovek™ Scumhunting™ Inc.

In post 218, Zdenek wrote:

In post 217, Pjovek wrote:Because sword was a great day1 lynch (and still is)

In the meantime he has dodged replacement forcing with promises of more lurking, so yeah. A good lynch indeed.


Also should I share my super-secret way of reading ffery as town?
It'll cost you though.

Where did sword promise to do more lurking?

When he posted to let us know he'd actually play the game later.

Emphasis on "later"

In post 220, Pjovek wrote:

In post 218, Zdenek wrote:

In post 217, Pjovek wrote:Because sword was a great day1 lynch (and still is)

In the meantime he has dodged replacement forcing with promises of more lurking, so yeah. A good lynch indeed.


Also should I share my super-secret way of reading ffery as town?
It'll cost you though.

Where did sword promise to do more lurking?

When he posted to let us know he'd actually play the game later.

It looks like the opposite of promising to do more lurking.

Do you think that policy lynching in this game is appropriate? Would you be willing to risk outing the apocalypse role base on a policy?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php?a ... 6&sr=posts

So what exactly is wrong with L-1, tierce?

In post 216, Zdenek wrote:

Tierce

, how do this games mechanics affect your read on Whimsy and the wagon on her?

pjo, why'd you think to vote Sword of Omens when you did?

About Ffery: she said "I assume pjo gambits no matter what alignment he is." When I asked her about it, she replied with "I was asking mrbungles because they've played together elsewhere." There was no question mark in her original post - this has been bothering me for a while, but I'm worried that it's just me being pedantic. I agree with Matt that this comment: "But, if he doesn't gambit irrespective of alignment he'd be awfully easy to spot as scum. So yeah, I think he gambits no matter what his alignment" looks baseless, since she was (apparently) asking mrbungles about pjo's scum play. It could simply just be that he's easy to spot as scum.

It obvious that ffrey was buddying with pjo, and I don't understand her prob-town read on mrbungles.

So there are somethings that I don't like here. I still don't think that she's as bad as Whimsical Eggplant or mrbungles.

I find mrbungle's paranoia about me refreshing and it's part of the reason why I think he's town. This is the first game we've played from the start, and I think if he'd had only a few posts to read instead of dozens in the dragonballz micro game he'd have had similar misgivings.

pjo I can't explain, really. Call it gut. I had a strong town read on his slot in the newbie game I linked to when I did my catch-up read after replacing in at 15 pages of day 1. I've wondered if I just read that style of play as town by default. But, until I find I'm wrong, I'll trust my gut.

I'm not shy about giving out town reads. I'm not shy about retracting them, either, but don't usually need to.