pedit: I presumed you said the whole case was nonsense and didn't even bother responding#
perhaps it's debateable but his blind votes are shit.
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 9:22 am
by TheIrishPope
T S O is still null
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 10:16 am
by Shadi1337
In post 184, ProHawk wrote:
Kinda like blindly RVS'ing every game right?
Now that I think of it this is a much bigger game so RVS should probably be more than one person. UNVOTE:
In post 179, Shadi1337 wrote:
What do you mean with shielding scum-vibe, and once you have explained it tell me which posts you see this in or which part of them.
ProHawk wrote:This whole game is a WIFOM tangle, its the fun of it.
vote:ProHawk
for the above quote. He's either scum or a bad player. That makes him a good enough lynch for me. I hope I don't need to explain why this quote is incredibly wrong to you guys.
I will have crappy availability for the next few days, which fits my scum gameplan of lurking very well. All jokes aside, I just moved into a new place and we can't get the Wifi to work. I am going to visit my parents for the weekend, so I will post by Saturday at the latest. Apologies to all, I didn't think this was going to be an issue when I signed up for this game but I will make sure to pull my weight.
Scum suspect #2 is BROseidan for making a town read on page 2.
Scum suspect #3 is TiP for excessive posting and for possibly being BROseidan's buddy.
Stevie
I know, I know the thread took off and it was your first post/vote... however. Safe vote is well... safe... and you obviously put a lot of thought into it.
Actually I didn't, for me #19 just made a lot of sense back then but I underestimated the player amount. It is still mildly suspicious but not /that/ much. Didn't really care for the rest of the posts, either repeated logic or nothing new.
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 10:28 am
by StevieT92
skimmed stuff because im lazy and talking to a friend in the library
i never said don't townread, i said you shouldn't have a townread by page two. do you get the difference and why i think that might be.
unvote, vote:nero
for the 2 back to back votes with no analysis or reason for the switch.
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 10:29 am
by Nero
ahahahahahaha
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 10:29 am
by Nero
yeah i voted holiday then realised he was just an idiot so went back to my original fos
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 10:31 am
by Nero
beautiful omgus though. the way you incorporated it into your post was pulchritudinous.
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:06 am
by TMTOLBTWNTOF
Please votecount
In post 131, KingCrabd wrote:
Nulls:
Orc (not enough posts yet)
Everyone Else because it’s like page 6 and several people only have RVS posts.
Lol... Orc and everyone else? That was a weird way to phrase it.
In post 130, Doc Holliday wrote:
PE: omfg people, STOP with the crap filler posts. We're in the middle of page 6 in a 24 player game sevenish hours old. Unless you ACTUALLY WANT mass flaking, stop posting unless you have something real to say for chrissake
Wadup
No but seriously dude calm down, if it's filler then skip it.
No. Fillering makes it harder to pick out scum posts.
Stevie, do you have anything to say about your other two scumreads- Tip and bro?
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:08 am
by Mac
you were ninja'd by my post 9 hours ago?
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:08 am
by TheIrishPope
I'm a scumread? D: welp
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:20 am
by DOMO
VOTE: TMNT
Mac's points, + his posts are starting to look full of fluff (while attempting to appear not fluff)
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:28 am
by Doc Holliday
@TSO: The only blind vote I've made was my RVS vote. My reasoning on Nero has been clearly stated, and he gets scummier with every post.
If you're not going to read the thread, don't pretend. You make a half-assed case against one person that is just chock full of misrepresentation (saying that I'm discouraging posting is a blatant falsehood, I was asking for MORE content, less crap) is just lazy
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:30 am
by Doc Holliday
Grammar fail.
Rephrase: Making a single, half-assed case on one person isn't participation, it's just lazy
In post 182, BROseidon wrote:I don't get what you two are seeing in 41. If either you or Nacho would explain it, then I would be able to have an opinion about whether or not you're right.
Nacho's reason may be a little different. The thing that I picked up on was an awkward indirectness. "I think I see what you are seeing", rather than "Is it because of X?" or something similar. This looks scummy to me because I see scum do this way more often than town, like they are afraid that they'll have the wrong "answer" about why the post in question looks bad.
Town players don't worry about having the wrong answer - they worry about getting something useful back, and tend to be more direct as a result.
This reasoning is solid. Do you think that Ank is the best lynch right now?
TSO is null. Case isn't great, but I think there are points there that are not bad. Doc is still null, maybe null-lean-scum.
Letters kind of null right now. Need to see more. Need to reread Nero to get a better sense of what I think there, but right now I think he's also a little scummy (although he and Stevie probably aren't both scum unless this is multiball).
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:34 am
by Doc Holliday
Broseidon, I would like to introduce you to a concept called powerbussing. I have no real reason to suspect Stevie right now (really, Nero's presented like no case) but dismissing vicious enemies as scumbuddies is just asking to be taken advantage of
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:34 am
by TheIrishPope
BRO is scum
We got one boys!
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:37 am
by BROseidon
In post 215, Doc Holliday wrote:Broseidon, I would like to introduce you to a concept called powerbussing. I have no real reason to suspect Stevie right now (really, Nero's presented like no case) but dismissing vicious enemies as scumbuddies is just asking to be taken advantage of
In post 182, BROseidon wrote:I don't get what you two are seeing in 41. If either you or Nacho would explain it, then I would be able to have an opinion about whether or not you're right.
Nacho's reason may be a little different. The thing that I picked up on was an awkward indirectness. "I think I see what you are seeing", rather than "Is it because of X?" or something similar. This looks scummy to me because I see scum do this way more often than town, like they are afraid that they'll have the wrong "answer" about why the post in question looks bad.
Town players don't worry about having the wrong answer - they worry about getting something useful back, and tend to be more direct as a result.
This reasoning is solid. Do you think that Ank is the best lynch right now?
TSO is null. Case isn't great, but I think there are points there that are not bad. Doc is still null, maybe null-lean-scum.
Letters kind of null right now. Need to see more. Need to reread Nero to get a better sense of what I think there, but right now I think he's also a little scummy (although he and Stevie probably aren't both scum unless this is multiball).
I would feel better about the reasoning if a couple other good scumhunters had jumped on this. And I'd feel better about a few players too, tbh. I mean, we both pointed up a specific post.
I won't move my vote unless Syr disagrees strongly, or something more scummy gets posted.
