Mafiascum.net

etl can use this post for vc?

Okay I think Im starting to see Sakura town now. Liking that point above.

No, it's a bad reason to lynch someone, Daniel. Thanks for the misrep though.

Youre calling me out for a misrep and

Which wasnt even a misrep to begin with, but okay

In post 144, Sakura Hana wrote:

Indeed it isn't a stance on the 1v1, I never said the contrary.

I'm surprised why baldeagle came to my defense outta nowhere tho, you may be onto something Wis.

baldeagle: Vote

wrt the bold: okay then explain this post:

In post 117, Sakura Hana wrote:Did you read the thread?

In post 87, Sakura Hana wrote:I'm not liking myko's sudden attitude but I don't think it's inherently scummy.

I'm not voting for you based off one misrep.

the lack of you voting him makes me believe you're overly-cautious scum.

Yeah, anyway I'm not gonna vote him yet, because I dont wanna rush the day and I prob. will be afk half the night.

But so far I'm liking him for today's lynch

P-Edit: I asked if he re-read the thread and put a quote.

It was a reaction test, and it indeed doesn't show anywhere me saying I took a stance on the 1v1, but baldeagle jumped immediately to defend me for no reason.

In post 197, 1baldeagle1 wrote:That is not WKing, though.

P-Edit: No, myko. Stop or I will report you.

I wish you were this passionate about the game.

But pluspoints for antagonizing people, I guess?

That's actually a good point, mollie.

Sakura, you presented that when Daniel said you had not given stances on the 1v1, ergo you considered it a stance.

In post 162, Sakura Hana wrote:My vote was fake tho, It was mostly a reaction test. Just like my post where I asked Daniel if he read the thread, It got quite some interesting reactions from people, but more specially from baldeagle.

Just in case the mod counted it tho

Unvote

But yeah.

if it was fake why are you unvoting

In post 209, Sakura Hana wrote:It was a reaction test

To test what?

@mollie
because the mod counted it

glad some people paid attention. Regardless, that's hardly giving any info about sakura's allignment.

In post 215, Wisdom wrote:UNVOTE:

uhm. Mind explaining this one?

In post 213, Wisdom wrote:

In post 209, Sakura Hana wrote:It was a reaction test

To test what?

I was going to test what Daniel would say on it, whether he said i took a stance or not, which i never said I did, yet I got an ever better reaction from baldeagle.

In post 209, Sakura Hana wrote:P-Edit: I asked if he re-read the thread and put a quote.

It was a reaction test, and it indeed doesn't show anywhere me saying I took a stance on the 1v1,

That's a lie. You were responding to Daniel's "you didn't give any stances on the 1v1" and you presented this quote as a stance.

Yet despite that, later you argued that it wasn't a stance.


VOTE: sakura

i'm confused now.

In post 219, Wisdom wrote:That's a lie. You were responding to Daniel's "you didn't give any stances on the 1v1" and you presented this quote as a stance.

Uhh nope, I never stated that I took a stance there, if I did, quote it, because you're misrepping me.

sec, I'll de-confuse you in a bit

From this whole ordeal, I think Myko is scum, but I think he's at L-2 last time I checked.

And he isn't, so I have no problem voting him now.

VOTE: Myko