Page 9 of 145
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:01 am
by shos
In post 127, Grimgroove wrote:VOTE: Malakittens
For suresies.
I also think one of mollie/Arcangel is scum, but not both.
I have no townreads yet, which is peculiar.
please elaborate on how what and why. It so happens that I have no scumreads yet, and I do have townreads. how does that work?
current leaningtownreads are mollie(explained earlier) and whiskers - whiskers' posting of late sorta looks like it comes from a town mindset. disagree, but town.
@
131:...no. that is not defenive in the slightest..
and dat 'new playstyle'..I don't get it. what's your point? what are you trying to say in here? "oh if I look odd/scummy then just ignore"?
VOTE: Matt
seriously, this is the most inactive mattgame I have ever seen, I meanw ut. he was usualy superhyperextraactive. now he only has a few one-liner posts and he's EVEN VOATING MEEEEE i mean WUUT
@Des 140: can you explain to me more what the hell 'telegraphing his own future towntells' means? I'm totally misunderstanding something or it's just bluntly unrelated to the quote?
and in 142 - do you think it's a legitimate reason to vote mala right now?
143 by wisdom is good. might join dat wagon actually.
<removed quote of 145 asking for a link>
Mala's next post looks ok. sincere.
des witha nother filler.
[going afk, will continue later]
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:03 am
by ooba
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:05 am
by Desperado
Grim, there's nothing out of the ordinary about mollie and arc mutually townreading each other that early. With that said, I think they would totally do that as scum too.
Mirari's
#195...seriously? Grim is going to have an aneurysm when he sees that.
I don't think Wisdom is scum.
Unvote
Vote: Mala
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:08 am
by Desperado
In post 200, shos wrote:@Des 140: can you explain to me more what the hell 'telegraphing his own future towntells' means? I'm totally misunderstanding something or it's just bluntly unrelated to the quote?
It wasn't related to the quote, it was a re-sequitor to an earlier part of my conversation with Whiskers.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:10 am
by Desperado
In post 200, shos wrote:and in 142 - do you think it's a legitimate reason to vote mala right now?
des witha nother filler.
Yup. I was letting their interaction play out.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:12 am
by Wisdom
Change leaning scum to scum on penguin
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:15 am
by pirate mollie
I can't tell if that is a yes or a no the red x is confusing but since you are still posting in images I am still guessing you do unless you are trolling me and then I will hunt you down and...I will think of something.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:16 am
by Malakittens
In post 196, Grimgroove wrote: In post 188, Malakittens wrote:I have a decent way of reading pen. The more she doesn't post the more of a chance she's scum. So yes my vote was to bait her into posting (which worked the first time)
In post 193, Malakittens wrote:
It's not the lack of activity that's making me lean scum on her. It's the fact she appeared right after I voted for her that makes me really lean scum on her.
Hmm, it's not what you said before.
I want to see how your 1v1 with Penguin plays out when she gets here. But I don't see you initializing the conversation with her. Apart from that empty vote and a tongue-in-cheek comment that you'll leave that vote there I haven't seen any concrete effort from your side to spur Penguin into action.
Her reply is very similar in timing to
this. Please note I voted her and then she responded there to how I did here. It's odd how she only decided to come into this thread after a voted landed on her.
Well, it's kinda hard to initializing conversation when only one half is here. How am I supposed to initialize a conversation with her w/o her being present. Hence why I'm
having
some discussion about her hoping it would lure her into this game. Maybe some help from someone else would be very
helpful
to me right now or else I have to get my result somewhere else, but I rather not.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:16 am
by pirate mollie
I can't tell if that is a yes or a no the red x is confusing but since you are still posting in images I am still guessing you do unless you are trolling me and then I will hunt you down and...I will think of something.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:17 am
by Wisdom
ooba is most likely trolling and he should stop it and start posting.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:17 am
by ooba
In post 206, pirate mollie wrote:I can't tell if that is a yes or a
the red x is confusing but since you are still posting in images I am still guessing you do unless you are trolling me and then I will hunt you down and...I will think of something.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:19 am
by pirate mollie
I have never ever seen ooba troll before. ever
VOTE: ooba
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:23 am
by Malakittens
welp my dad just came home and my internet fucking went to shit, fuck this so much.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:29 am
by penguin_alien
In post 207, Malakittens wrote:Her reply is very similar in timing to this. Please note I voted her and then she responded there to how I did here. It's odd how she only decided to come into this thread after a voted landed on her.
There's a big difference between an RVS vote and a serious vote on Day Five of a game. I don't see your point.
shos, do you have a specific problem with MattP's vote on you?
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:29 am
by Mirari
VOTE: Shos
Mollie vote Shos with me instead of sussing out ooba.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:31 am
by pirate mollie
do I know you mirari?
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:32 am
by Mirari
Not that I know. I have only played two games here and I don't think you were a player in those games. I'm just asking you too vote because ooba votes are bad.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:33 am
by Malakittens
In post 213, penguin_alien wrote: In post 207, Malakittens wrote:Her reply is very similar in timing to this. Please note I voted her and then she responded there to how I did here. It's odd how she only decided to come into this thread after a voted landed on her.
There's a big difference between an RVS vote and a serious vote on Day Five of a game. I don't see your point.
shos, do you have a specific problem with MattP's vote on you?
Mine was never an RVS vote here actually since we were out of RVS way before I appeared at least in my mind since there was some discussion going.
stoppppppppppp ninjaaaaaaaing me ._.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:33 am
by Wisdom
UNVOTE:
VOTE: penguin
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:35 am
by pirate mollie
In post 216, Mirari wrote:Not that I know. I have only played two games here and I don't think you were a player in those games. I'm just asking you too vote because ooba votes are bad.
why are ooba votes bad
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:38 am
by Desperado
Unvote
Vote: Penguin
Penguin you're doing that self-centered, reactive thing you do when you're scum. And we were totally not in RVS anymore when Mala voted you. And you're ignoring the "Nacho was defensive" thing, which is a huge red flag.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:39 am
by penguin_alien
I don't get the 'Nacho was defensive' thing.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:40 am
by Wisdom
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Desp
You are sheeping and echoing everything I do.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:49 am
by penguin_alien
Yeah, that still doesn't look like Nacho being defensive. Who tried to spin it that way first, mollie? Then AA9, then Mala.
In post 126, Whiskers wrote: In post 121, pirate mollie wrote:I understood that it was a relative tell that he was talking about.
what is funny is I don't really think that nacho was being defensive, I was mostly trolling him and pushing his buttons and while I get why arc and mebbe even mala followed my push cos they he and I are pretty good friends and sometimes nacho can be a blank slate that is best observed through other people's eyes when all you see is an empty canvas but i find your push to be weird.
Hey, thanks for answering a question I addressed to someone else.
I don't think he was being defensive either. My quote that made me think he was trying to play to that "relative tell" was "NO NO NO NO NO."
That's not a real defence. It's not real defensiveness. But is it "screaming his little head off"?
So, misrepping, too.
I like you a
lot
.
If mollie actually intended to get anything useful out of this, I'd think it would be that people who agreed with her 'Nacho = defensive' claim immediately are opportunistic, while those who bother to disagree are towny. But then she votes the one who calls out the absurdity of the initial statement.
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:52 am
by Desperado
In post 222, Wisdom wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Desp
You are sheeping and echoing everything I do.
Yeah--because I'm town and I'm seeing the same things you are.
