Mafiascum.net

I love how the person I voted started question-tunneling me.

You don't look nervous at all.

In post 198, Deacon Blues wrote:Tammy who do you have as scum?

Haven't read the game.

In post 200, Kazekirimaru wrote:I love how the person I voted started question-tunneling me.

You don't look nervous at all.

I'm not nervous. I'm not getting lynched. Being town when I'm town is what I do.

Asking two questions about your motives is not question-tunneling by the way.

Mkay, that was probably just my arrogance talking. Still! ^^

In post 201, Tammy wrote:

In post 198, Deacon Blues wrote:Tammy who do you have as scum?

Haven't read the game.

So what was your reason for joining the prohawk wagon? Because Nacho said?

In post 204, Deacon Blues wrote:

In post 201, Tammy wrote:

In post 198, Deacon Blues wrote:Tammy who do you have as scum?

Haven't read the game.

So what was your reason for joining the prohawk wagon? Because Nacho said?

Yep:

In post 162, Nachomamma8 wrote:Can you vote hawk with me until you find a better scumread?

In post 199, Kazekirimaru wrote:The stars elongated by as it accelerated to lightspeed.

At this point in the game? I'd think scum would try to push someone who has already had suspicion cast upon them than just vote a 2-post wonder and call for more votes.

Do you think it was a wagon intended for a lynch?

When do you expect to have the thread read?

In post 201, Tammy wrote:Haven't read the game.

Here. Have some incentive to do so.

VOTE: Tammy

I'm also up for MafiaSSK, if anyone wants to go a hunting off wagon.

In post 207, Deacon Blues wrote:When do you expect to have the thread read?

In the next day or so. Thursday at the latest.

In post 208, The Rufflig wrote:

In post 201, Tammy wrote:Haven't read the game.

Here. Have some incentive to do so.

VOTE: Tammy

Sorry it doesn't work that way. That actually will make me not read the thread. If you don't want to actually scum hunt that's your thing.

Actually

VOTE: the rufflig

That was quite possibly the most horrible hop on my wagon you could have thought of.

Like I can't possibly think that you actually think someone is scum for not reading the previous pages of the game, blatantly admitting to not doing it, yet jumping in where I am and interacting, which is just as important if not far more important.

So, that's really really lazy. And I don't think town you is that lazy.

You're reacting very badly to an obvious pressure vote.

Nope. I think it's scum motivated "pressure". You see two people voting me for silliness. And you apply pressure for me to "read the thread". It doesn't work that way. Did you think it would make me hop to it to read the thread? No.

You saw another wagon rising while the Prohawk one was dropping, and it looked easy for you to join for quite possibly the dumbest reason I think I've ever been voted. I think you wanted an easy wagon to join so you wouldn't have to actually scumhunt.

There was no need to pressure anyway, you've already seen me react to the two votes that were on me. If you actually thought that I was reacting poorly, you would have mentioned that. You didn't bother because you can't find anything scummy about my reactions to the votes on me. So, you went for "incentive" which is poor and lazy.

Do you know why the Prohawk wagon took off in the first place? If you know that, you can understand why I'm up for a MafiaSSK wagon and why I'm also all right with your wagon.

Nacho either thought he was scum or wanted him sorted.

But, the difference is, if you wanted to pressure me, you wouldn't have given the scummiest laziest stupidest reason to vote me ever. You'd just have given a vote, maybe parroted that I was the scum on the wagon, but you didn't. You felt the need to give a stupid reason, that's what was scummy.

Also, I was already reacting to my wagon. If you were interested in the "pressure" you would have acknowledged something about my already forming reaction.

Also, ALSO, both the people on my wagon also suggested that you could be scum. Gods you joining my wagoning is even scummier than I originally thought it was.

I am voting with you in spirit, tammy.

Well, it is a serious vote now and you've provided plenty of reasons for it.

In post 206, Tammy wrote: Do you think it was a wagon intended for a lynch?

Depends on what intentions you're talking about.

Nacho's intention? Probably for pressure. But anyone else's intention is up for debate. It's hard to say whether is a wagon is purely an X wagon or a Y wagon or what have you since it's pushed by multiple people.

In post 220, Kazekirimaru wrote:

In post 206, Tammy wrote: Do you think it was a wagon intended for a lynch?

Depends on what intentions you're talking about.

Nacho's intention? Probably for pressure. But anyone else's intention is up for debate. It's hard to say whether is a wagon is purely an X wagon or a Y wagon or what have you since it's pushed by multiple people.

You do realize that you were on that bandwagon, do you not?

What were your reasons?

In post 219, The Rufflig wrote:Well, it is a serious vote now and you've provided plenty of reasons for it.

Mkay. I feel better about my vote. Except you have a 100% better chance of flipping scum than I do.

Prohawk,

Why so terse?

In post 221, Tammy wrote: You do realize that you were on that bandwagon, do you not?

What were your reasons?

Because Nacho told me to. And I like wagons.

In post 222, Tammy wrote: Mkay. I feel better about my vote. Except you have a 100% better chance of flipping scum than I do.

If you're implying that's because you're town and he's scum technically he'd have an infinite percent better chance of flipping scum...

yeah never mind