Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:30 pm**

Vote Count 1.8

MafiaSSK(0):

Cabd(0):

Selkies(3):

Cabd, zMuffinman, MafiaSSK

zMuffinMan(3):

Selkies, FourTrouble, Aronis

FourTrouble(0):

King Kenny(0):

The Goodfather(0):

kabooooom(0):

Karlos4(0):

RossWilliam(0):

Aronis(0):

Idiotking(0):

Katsuki(0):

No Lynch(0):

Not Voting(7):

King Kenny, The Goodfather, kabooooom, Karlos4, RossWilliam, Idiotking, Katsuki

With thirteen alive, it takes seven to lynch.

Deadline:

(expired on 2014-02-04 21:00:00)

Non-confirmed players have fourty-eight hours to confirm.

(expired on 2014-01-23 21:00:00)

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:30 pm**

I DID IT. I MADE YOU GET A PAGE TOP

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:31 pm**

Anywho back to this game, Muffin is town and the three votes are dumb.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:32 pm**

In post 197, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 187, Aronis wrote:So. . . I'm going to guess MafiaSSK and FourTrouble are town.

So. . .

[VOTE: zMuffin]
So how about you describe your reason?

Seems like a decent vote, either him, Selkies, or Katsuki. They seem the most likely tk be scum. Do you have a better idea?

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:33 pm**

In post 196, Cabd wrote:
In post 176, Selkies wrote:People
not named cabd
don't actually get to slap down a scumread on me and then not push that wagon. That's not how this works.
FTFY

It's amazing how often I forget that you're actually a person and not just an annoying bot.

Pedit: Oh, glorious MafiaSSK, "I am known to lurk at times. I am known to be anti-town. I am known for policy lynches. So yeah.", depart unto us more holy advice with which to lynch the wretched scum

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:34 pm**

fourtrouble wrote:scum care more about rules that hurt them than town

again, baseless assertion

but let's suppose this is true

do you agree that scum care about their image? or at least are more conscious of what they're posting? if they are, then posting something that scum are more likely to care about seems kinda contradictory to this notion

and no, this isn't WIFOM. this is common sense

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:34 pm**

In post 202, MafiaSSK wrote:Anywho back to this game, Muffin is town and the three votes are dumb.

How so?

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:34 pm**

In post 203, Aronis wrote:
In post 197, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 187, Aronis wrote:So. . . I'm going to guess MafiaSSK and FourTrouble are town.

So. . .

[VOTE: zMuffin]
So how about you describe your reason?
Seems like a decent vote, either him, Selkies, or Katsuki. They seem the most likely tk be scum. Do you have a better idea?

Okay so you seem to think that scum is in that group. Why that group in particular? Because they've been the ones that have been most often voted on?

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:35 pm**

zMuffinMan wrote:
fourtrouble wrote:scum care more about rules that hurt them than town
again, baseless assertion

but let's suppose this is true

do you agree that scum care about their image? or at least are more conscious of what they're posting? if they are, then posting something that scum are more likely to care about seems kinda contradictory to this notion

and no, this isn't WIFOM. this is common sense

In post 192, Selkies wrote:
In post 162, Selkies wrote:also muffin is actually here and i assume he wants to talk to me!

In post 176, Selkies wrote:People don't actually get to slap down a scumread on me and then not push that wagon. That's not how this works.

Hey. You.

just lynch him guys

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:35 pm**

In post 204, Selkies wrote:
In post 196, Cabd wrote:
In post 176, Selkies wrote:People
not named cabd
don't actually get to slap down a scumread on me and then not push that wagon. That's not how this works.
FTFY
It's amazing how often I forget that you're actually a person and not just an annoying bot.

Pedit: Oh, glorious MafiaSSK, "I am known to lurk at times. I am known to be anti-town. I am known for policy lynches. So yeah.", depart unto us more holy advice with which to lynch the wretched scum

Wait, when did I say that?
And why can't my advice be treated as equal here?

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:36 pm**

In post 206, Selkies wrote:
In post 202, MafiaSSK wrote:Anywho back to this game, Muffin is town and the three votes are dumb.
How so?

His activity, how full of content his posts are. Things like that.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:36 pm**

In post 205, zMuffinMan wrote:
fourtrouble wrote:scum care more about rules that hurt them than town
again, baseless assertion

but let's suppose this is true

do you agree that scum care about their image? or at least are more conscious of what they're posting? if they are, then posting something that scum are more likely to care about seems kinda contradictory to this notion

and no, this isn't WIFOM. this is common sense

I agree. I think scum would be far more likely to PM the mod and ask wtf than comment about it in the game thread.

Cabd I'm not going to read your offisite games tonight but I'm curious if scum commented on the rule in the game threads.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:37 pm**

In post 205, zMuffinMan wrote:
fourtrouble wrote:scum care more about rules that hurt them than town
again, baseless assertion

but let's suppose this is true

do you agree that scum care about their image? or at least are more conscious of what they're posting? if they are, then posting something that scum are more likely to care about seems kinda contradictory to this notion

and no, this isn't WIFOM. this is common sense

But holy shit this is a mess of wifom and the degree to which you're defending Katsuki is a bit disturbing.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:38 pm**

camps, we haz them.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:39 pm**

In post 211, Selkies wrote:Cabd I'm not going to read your offisite games tonight but I'm curious if scum commented on the rule in the game threads.

No, they used their daytalk private thread

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:39 pm**

In post 209, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 204, Selkies wrote:
In post 196, Cabd wrote:
In post 176, Selkies wrote:People
not named cabd
don't actually get to slap down a scumread on me and then not push that wagon. That's not how this works.
FTFY
It's amazing how often I forget that you're actually a person and not just an annoying bot.

Pedit: Oh, glorious MafiaSSK, "I am known to lurk at times. I am known to be anti-town. I am known for policy lynches. So yeah.", depart unto us more holy advice with which to lynch the wretched scum
Wait, when did I say that?
And why can't my advice be treated as equal here?

It's on your damn wiki page, Mr. "How-Dare-You-Call-Me-An-Easy-Lynch"

I might consider it if you had a smidgeon of reasoning behind it. But it doesn't, much like your vote on me. For, uh, what was it again? Oh right. Nothing.

Muffin's popped in, dropped a few scum reads, refused to give any reasoning when prompted multiple times, and posted a bunch of crap. "His activity" is underwhelming because he's presumably in-thread and refusing to interact with his scumreads or push anything. "His content" is shit.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:39 pm**

In post 213, Selkies wrote:camps, we haz them.

I don't think we'll ever be in the same camp.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:40 pm**

mafiassk wrote:But holy shit this is a mess of wifom and the degree to which you're defending Katsuki is a bit disturbing.

*shrug* it seems to be a major point of contention, with people asking questions about it, so i wouldn't exactly call it a defense

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:40 pm**

In post 214, Cabd wrote:
In post 211, Selkies wrote:Cabd I'm not going to read your offisite games tonight but I'm curious if scum commented on the rule in the game threads.
No, they used their
daytalk private thread

Imagine that.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:41 pm**

hey cabd you wanna vote muffin now

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:42 pm**

In post 203, Aronis wrote:Seems like a decent vote, either him, Selkies, or Katsuki. They seem the most likely tk be scum. Do you have a better idea?

rereading, the inclusion of and only of all 3 wagons disturbs me like fuck.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:43 pm**

In post 216, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 213, Selkies wrote:camps, we haz them.
I don't think we'll ever be in the same camp.

I'm not so sure about that.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:43 pm**

In post 219, Selkies wrote:hey cabd you wanna vote muffin now

The tenacity of your read and or push on him is actually giving me confusion and off notes to the tune of "Let's do exactly the opposite of what we did as scum in 1531" so nope. I can't believe I have to tell YOUR HYDRA, of all things, that I'll vote when I'm damn well ready.

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:44 pm**

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:44 pm**

This may be just putting a huge kick me sign on my back, but i looked at rule 6 a lot differently...

It hurts the town worse in my estimation. 13 players,, probably 3 or 4 scum. The burden falls on us as the town to make a decisive lynch, otherwise, we're basically asking natirasha to kill us herself...If, for example, we do not have a majority by the end of this dp, 9/14 times, a townie will be killed (assuming 4 scum).

I'm frankly suprised that i am the only one who sees it that way...

alright, i've said my bit, here you go:

Mafiascum.net

Mini 1543--Natirasha's On Parole!(Game Over)