Mafiascum.net

What do you empathize?

Wow, that read incredibly fake. Bunch of blah statements. Taking an opposite stance on the Zekrom wagon, but not really explaining what was bad about it. Why is the Zekrom wagon shamefully poor, TSO? What makes you think Zekrom might be town? He then follows that up with some buddying of Thor, and then essentially gives town a pep talk at the end, which reads like fake excitement. Lot of sparkle. Zero content.

That's cute, Bulba. That's really cute.

Curiously, you discredited everything but my read on you, which seems an incredibly circular thing to do. Then again, you can't openly complain I'm scumreading you, so slinging mud doesn't seem unrealistic.

There's not much to discredit, is there? You provided zero reasoning for anything you said. Your read on me was essentially so you could buddy up to Thor easier, and you used his own reasoning to do so. Maybe if you would have provided some actual analysis, then you might have a case for saying I'm trying to discredit you, but you provided none whatsoever.

I'm trying to buddy Thor by pushing a case which he ...dropped for a different one?

In post 204, T S O wrote:I'm trying to buddy Thor by pushing a case which he ...dropped for a different one?

It doesn't matter that he stopped voting me. He's never recanted his read, which means that it's still viable, especially when you use his reasoning to say that he'd be conf. town if I flipped scum. So yes, you're trying to buddy him.

I'm not "using his reasoning" to say he'd be confirmed Town if you flipped scum. I'm saying that the way he immediately interacted with you and collared you, and your rubbish reaction to it, means there's no way it's a faked reaction on both sides.

Quit twisting words and face me like a man, Bulba.

You based your scumread on me off of his reasoning. When I called you out on it, you then say "Well, he's no longer pushing you." as if that means he no longer thinks that, which you know is false, since he's still bringing that up. When I call bull crap on you again, you then accuse me of twisting your words, when anyone who can read will know that is not the case. And what's with the "face me like a man" threat? I brought up reasoning for all my assertions, while you have avoided doing just that. Why are you, then, trying to paint me as some coward lurking in the shadows and taking potshots, when I have brought out actual concerns about your posts and asked you actual pointed questions, which you have yet to answer, btw?

TSO comes in and effectively defends Zek TSO is that all you have to say, have you read anything other than the vote count?

Sorry, but do you mean effectively as in "efficiently" or effectively as in "might as well have/in effect?"

effectively - in effect

Sooo TSO, Zek, and Zak, and NOT bulba?

What do you think, could be a manufactured argument to distract the attention on Zek. TSOs post appears to criticise the Zek wagon then goes after Zak or Bulb or Bulba or Bulbazak, whatever you want to call him. He responds by voting TSO for what? And after he has spent most of today parked on you Porkens.

bulb can you explain your case on tso in simple English? Because I don't get what you're trying to say in #207.

In post 213, cxinlee wrote:bulb can you explain your case on tso in simple English? Because I don't get what you're trying to say in #207.

TSO's posts upon entering the game were bland and devoid of analysis, which is strange, since I'd expect some sort of analysis from TSO upon catching up with a game such as this. Instead, he echoes Thor's reasonings for why I'm scum. He immediately questions the largest wagon, while not giving any reason why he thinks it may be on town, and then he says he doesn't like Bro, although, again, he doesn't go into why. He then continues to buddy up to Thor by saying that if I were to flip scum, Thor would be conf. town. He finishes this all off with a pat on the back statement of "We can do this guys!" which feels fake as crap.

We of course go back and forth when I point this out, but it's more on the Thor buddying point more than anything else. TSO really doesn't want to look like he's buddying Thor, and he does everything he can to try to discredit this notion. Finally he says that he couldn't be buddying Thor by copying his reasoning, because Thor is no longer voting me, which means that he dropped his case on me. This is false, since Thor has continued to call me scum relatively recently. TSO was trying to grasp at anything he could to try to discredit the notion that he was buddying up to Thor, and in desperation, he used an argument that anybody with even a little bit of mafia experience would have known to be false. After all this, he tells me to face him like a man, as if I've been hiding in the shadows the whole time and sniping at him, instead of facing him head on like I've been doing. Meanwhile, he still hasn't answered the questions I've asked him concerning his stance on Zek, which I feel to be just as important, if not more so, than his relationship to Thor.

In post 212, Smudger wrote:What do you think, could be a manufactured argument to distract the attention on Zek. TSOs post appears to criticise the Zek wagon then goes after Zak or Bulb or Bulba or Bulbazak, whatever you want to call him. He responds by voting TSO for what? And after he has spent most of today parked on you Porkens.

It's hard for me at the moment to see past all the smarm in TSO's posts, I'll come back with clear eyes later. The names are also making it confusing.

Zekrom25: fools around in the thread blah blah blah
Zakk: blunders in to defend Zekrom25/attacks Scorpion/Leaves
Bulbazak: Need to read again
TSO: Need to read again

In post 207, Bulbazak wrote:You based your scumread on me off of his reasoning.

Let's assume this is true for a while.

What would be wrong with this?

In post 179, XScorpion wrote:

I think he is pretending

(poorly) to do something, which is why I think he is scum.

I guess my point is that I disagree with the underlined. How is he "pretending?" I would agree that he had fluff posts but that's not really the same thing now is it?

In post 208, Smudger wrote:TSO comes in and effectively defends Zek TSO is that all you have to say, have you read anything other than the vote count?

It's highly condensed thoughts, Smudger. If you want me to elongate my sentences like Bulba so they become harder to read, then sure, I can do that. I'd prefer not to, though.

It feels like you want to talk to me about the game.

i feel Porkens is useless

^lol

Tso, why do you think zekrom is town?

I feel like everyone is useless about. Until 300 posts typically no super useful stufff

In post 219, Zekrom25 wrote:i feel Porkens is useless

What do you think I should be doing that I'm not?

In post 222, Porkens wrote:

In post 219, Zekrom25 wrote:i feel Porkens is useless

What do you think I should be doing that I'm not?

you aren't scum hunting, you only post which ones you want gone

Yates wrote:

In post 179, XScorpion wrote:

I think he is pretending

(poorly) to do something, which is why I think he is scum.

I guess my point is that I disagree with the underlined. How is he "pretending?" I would agree that he had fluff posts but that's not really the same thing now is it?

Can you tell me what you think of post 66?

TSO why don't you try to find out what Zekrom's alignment is if you are so sure he is unreadable?

Yiley can you post something that isn't useless if you think that's what the rest of us are?