Mafiascum.net

Spiff is prob town here even if he can't see obv scum.

Pied piper is town

The EP cakes town read is so soft. Same goes for there scum reads.

I am obv towning so the only noteworthy thing is the Tictac read which I disagree with

↑ Spiffeh wrote:That's stupid sorry

PEdit: It's fine for an initial read but I'm not buying that people are being convinced by beeboy's other points and I don't really like some people's behavior around the wagon (i.e Pied Piper)

Who's listening to his other points even?

I assume other people on the wagon that aren't calling them bullshit?

But the wagon is perfectly legit

↑ tictac wrote:Disagree. We are less than 24 hours into the game. It's a non-indicator at this point.
Which one are you?

↑ Spiffeh wrote:And no I think this is scum!Plot

Nah.

↑ Spiffeh wrote:That's stupid sorry

PEdit: It's fine for an initial read but I'm not buying that people are being convinced by beeboy's other points and I don't really like some people's behavior around the wagon (i.e Pied Piper)

That's the point I agree with, though. I don't find the point about buddying compelling, and I mentioned this earlier. Does my lack of vote bother you, then, or something else?

I'm pretty sure I'm the only other one on the wagon lmao

Be back later

Oh really?

I guess all the noise surrounding the slot made me assume they had a lot of votes

They have 4 lol

I'd lynch Tictac as well imo

↑ Mirhawk wrote:

↑ davesaz wrote:False dichotomy. You leave out the possibility that the behavior is neutral (or that I haven't formed an opinion on it yet) but the responses to my comments from him and others will help me sort people.

That's not how a false dichotomy works, as evidenced by the fact that you managed to answer my second question while pretending you didn't.

Both of the statements you made about Axel were accusatory in tone, they didn't sound neutral to me at least. Do you think Axel is town or scum?

@B
Dunno man, being self involved isn't really a scum tell.

You presented an either/or question which presented that there could not be any other answer, where the answer was none of the above. It doesn't get any more false dichotomy than that.

I made it very clear that my read is null. Your push however is not.
VOTE: Mirhawk

Why are people scum reading dav again?

↑ Spiffeh wrote:So many quote walls

I haven't seen a single one yet. Your threshold must be much lower.

Skimmed again, if i missed something directed at me please let me know, that being said some things stood out to me.
@Nacho: Weren't you on Disney Upick? hiplop was there (town him at least).
@beeboy: I don't get it, you're saying scum hiplop avoids confrontation or avoids you specifically.
@Cakez: If you think beeboy's flopping his read on me is scummy, you're going to have a hard time with me.
@Swordsworth: It's a bit too late for RVSing, why didn't you comment on anything else?

In general

↑ The Pied Piper wrote:Does my lack of vote bother you, then, or something else?

I feel like you devoted more time to meta talk than was necessary. hiplop hasn't really done enough yet for that discussion to be useful and it looks like filler content. Reminds me of scum!Plot in History where you kinda droned on about things that didn't matter.

Your fixation with tictac specifically is weird too? Like you bombard him with questions right from the get go for no clear reason. It makes me think you want to stroke beeboy's ego and goad his tunnel by nitpicking at someone who isn't really buying into it.

↑ The Pied Piper wrote:What do you think of my point that not doing anything is, in itself, scummy?

And I don't buy that you feel this way less than 24 hours into the game.

And Nacho hasn't really done anything that looks town so yeah I'm voting you

Oh the other Seniors voters are Snarky and Ogre. Neither of whom have said anything about their vote on Seniors sooooo
@Sakura, as long as you don't flipflop that ridiculously quickly we should be good.

↑ Axelrod wrote:I am not a fan of Sakura, or Davesaz.

@Sakura: (per post #64) did you

really

think that I was advocating for a "policy" lynch of all Hydras? Really?

@Davesaz: please explain to me how you feel I "pulled back" on "the Hydra thing" (post #69). Do you think I am advocating for a policy lynch of all Hydras?

Your 68 was a direct response to people making comments (in particular Sakura's 64 which your 68 quoted) about your apparent interest in PLing hydras. You posted something, people reacted, you posted a retraction. By definition that is pulling back. My comment was, in part, a means of prodding you to find out if you would be defensive about it being called that. You later posted about hydras again, and I pointed out the apparent inconsistency between 68 (implying it's not serious) and the later post explaining your stance. I don't remember if you responded to that or not...

Do I think it was serious? Don't know, your own posting implies it is at least partially serious, but even that could just as easily be a joke or itself a reaction test. I don't think it's alignment indicative by itself, since it's hard to distinguish between scum testing the waters and town fishing for (scum) sheep.

Hey Dav who else do you think is scum right now?

Cakes I am directing the same question at you.

↑ beeboy wrote:I am obv towning so the only noteworthy thing is the Tictac read which I disagree with

VI and proud heh?