Page 9 of 29

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:37 pm
by Zyf
ok thank you
I needed that XD

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 1:07 pm
by Sickofit1138
reason i dont like sad.

He has been lurking.
He has not been doing anything except defending his vote on me and he is not actively scumhunting.

Im completely convinced he is scum and i just need to find a buddy.

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:10 pm
by Vandit24
Rask maybe you should read my posts CORRECTLY. I mentioned i am not angry becuase he just has mentioned that i could be mafia (we all have suspicion over each other about this). Yes, the attack was horrible indeed, but no, that was just because of a post he made about suspicions, without even a single reason present (not even a single, likena forced allegation) which really really made it look like a flaming post.

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:10 pm
by Vandit24
Like a*

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:12 pm
by Vandit24
In post 201, Sickofit1138 wrote:reason i dont like sad.

He has been lurking.
He has not been doing anything except defending his vote on me and he is not actively scumhunting.

Im completely convinced he is scum and i just need to find a buddy.
I have been noticing it as well.. and just as i showed some interest in his evidence, boom, 5 posts in a row about ranger. Suspicious enough for me to vote for him as he is clearly defending himself from getting votes by a ton.

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:16 pm
by Vandit24
VOTE: Sad1492

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:19 pm
by Zyf
In post 201, Sickofit1138 wrote:reason i dont like sad.

He has been lurking.
He has not been doing anything except defending his vote on me and he is not actively scumhunting.

Im completely convinced he is scum and i just need to find a buddy.
This is the pot calling the kettle black. Sick has done the same and in fact has even more outdated reads than sad.

What was it that convinced you to immediately scumread sad after his first post voting you?
At that point in time, no one could be accused of lurking.

Sad posted at around 7:45pm EDT on June 1nd.
You nullscum read him around 12:30am EDT June 2nd-less than 5 hours later.
That can hardly be called lurking, can it?

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:22 pm
by Zyf
Are you kdding me.
Vandit.
You just hammered sad.

You IDIOT! We didn't even get a claim!!

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:38 pm
by Zyf
Sad if you have something to post post now before you get lynched!!!!!!!!!


Anyway in case I get nk'ed you have this as my final thoughts (direct copy of post 149):
If they flip scum, then I'll feel much better about ranger and sickofit.
If they flip town, however...beeboy can definitely be more trusted and first place I'm pointing fingers is a ranger+sickofit scumteam.
2) Lynch sickofit-This is my ideal situation, as I think we'll get more 'mixed' or changing reaction out of this lynch; lynching sad is just that: a lynch. Unless sad claims for themself, their partner is highly unlikely to try and pull them out as it's very suspicious. Sickofit is a bit shakier and more discreet, and will be better for the discussion. Predictions on sick lynch:
If they flip scum, there are multiple people (ranger, apparently vandit, sad could still be scum, etc.) who could be their partners, but we'll have leads to start our investigation from the mess before the actual lynch.
If they flip town, then it'll completely change who I'm looking for. Ranger can be more trusted, and sad is gonna look more scummy for pushing sick and opposing them. Granted, it's mostly been me, but look at Sick's iso for yourself. It looks a lot like someone who's trying to fit in with whatever's going on at the time-without actually contributing anything.
3) Lynch Ranger-right now this is the riskiest one, because if they flip town we're in big trouble because we lost one of the main contributors to the discussions. And they have more experience than say, me.
If they flip scum, however, my first suspicions will be towards sick again. Followed by sad for a possible day 1 bus tactic.

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:39 pm
by Zyf
Whoops lost the first line. First line is "1) Lynch sad1492-"

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 2:47 pm
by Zyf
Anyone else have a "will" to write?

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:03 pm
by Sickofit1138
yes. if i get NKed... i told you so. i recomend a long look at vandit if sad flips town.

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:07 pm
by beeboy
Sorry guys feeling sick will read up later.

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:09 pm
by Zyf
In post 212, beeboy wrote:Sorry guys feeling sick will read up later.
^^ thanks for the update.
I was getting a little concerned
btw welcome to the sick squad XD

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:19 pm
by Zyf
Ok beeboy, since it's too late for sad, most interested on your reads on Vandit, Sick, Rask, and Fox.
Keep in mind Vandit comes from a EM background

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:42 pm
by Sickofit1138
Epic Mafia....

Those were days. I'm so glad I quit lol.

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:45 pm
by Vandit24
Role claim?? Anyone??

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:47 pm
by Zyf
In post 216, Vandit24 wrote:Role claim?? Anyone??
Literally no point anymore. Sad has been majority voted.
In fact, your push for a random role claim is extremely scummy.
Now reading vandit as scum.

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:48 pm
by Vandit24
Well usually, in Town of Salem, Epic Mafia all do role claims once majority votes have been posted

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:50 pm
by Vandit24
In post 207, Zyf wrote:Are you kdding me.
Vandit.
You just hammered sad.

You IDIOT! We didn't even get a claim!!
What did you mean by 'claim' here.. sorry but i am newbie

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:54 pm
by Zyf
In post 218, Vandit24 wrote:Well usually, in Town of Salem, Epic Mafia all do role claims once majority votes have been posted
That's stupid in forum mafia as this is based on deep thought. Also both Epic Mafia and Town of Salem have a lot of PRs. In this matrix6 game we only have 2 PR's max in a 9-person game.

I'm seriously suspicious of you now, Vandit. It's like you're posting without thinking, putting up a weak defense. Granted, there's no point in voting you right now.

PEdit: sad didn't even get a chance to say "i'm town because *evidence*" or say "i'm cop/doctor/tracker/jailkeeper/etc."
You have them no chance to defend themselves, and I don't really like that you completely ignored this:
In post 197, Zyf wrote:so.
What if I do this.
UNVOTE: sick
VOTE: sad1492
We really need your reads, sad.
Since no one else is interested in voting sick, we'll get more out of sad as I can't put any more pressure on sick and they don't really seem to care.
Sad, you're now at L-1. Get talking.
I even bolded it.
A lot of scum signs coming out of you right now...

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 3:59 pm
by Vandit24
Exactly and this was the reason i voted Sad. You can see my reason on post #204

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 4:03 pm
by Vandit24
In post 216, Vandit24 wrote:Role claim?? Anyone??
In post 217, Zyf wrote:
In post 216, Vandit24 wrote:Role claim?? Anyone??
Literally no point anymore. Sad has been majority voted.
In fact, your push for a random role claim is extremely scummy.
Now reading vandit as scum.
In post 219, Vandit24 wrote:
In post 207, Zyf wrote:Are you kdding me.
Vandit.
You just hammered sad.

You IDIOT! We didn't even get a claim!!
What did you mean by 'claim' here.. sorry but i am newbie
What did you MEAN by that word 'CLAIM' in the above post. This was the reason i brought up Role Claim because i thought you wanted to get a role claim on Sad

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 4:05 pm
by Vandit24
If you werent meaning that role claiming that is done in Town of Salem and Epic Mafia, then ok

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 4:09 pm
by Zyf
Vandit, a role claim coming out of sad means nothing if they've been majority voted. Their role is revealed after they die anyway. By not letting sad roleclaim before getting lynched, you may have ended up lynching a power role player.

I knew i shouldn't have put them at L1...urgh.

I'm starting to agree with vandit ranger scumteam